Book Reviews - Murders/Suicide at WHF

[marty]

Adam, you have had a private warning already but you are going too far I have removed your offensive lost 3 times if you post it again I shall ban you.

I don't know what Adam wrote, but I have seen people call other people xxxxxx,xxxxxxx xxxxxxx and such like, oh, but that's ok cause there posts are edited for the thousandth time.
Unless your gonna treat everyone the same the forums a nonsense.

[maggie]

I don't know what Adam wrote, but I have seen people call other people xxxxxx,xxxxxxx xxxxxxx and such like, oh, but that's ok cause there posts are edited for the thousandth time.
Unless your gonna treat everyone the same the forums a nonsense.

Is that so?

[Jane]

Why don't you remove posts that call me racist, or sexist. And say 'good post' yesterday when Jan accuses me of having no brain cells.

I was just agreeing with Scipio.And saying why Lookout posts incorrect facts without sources, asks for evidence and then ignores the evidence when it is posted

Nope, you were using it as ANOTHER excuse to be vile and foul. If ALL you said was that which was in the above post, the offending post would have remained. I imagine Scipio can manage very well without you corroborating his posts.

[Caroline]

I don't know what Adam wrote, but I have seen people call other people xxxxxx,xxxxxxx xxxxxxx and such like, oh, but that's ok cause there posts are edited for the thousandth time.
Unless your gonna treat everyone the same the forums a nonsense.

There is only one poster who uses such language and he owns the forum - his posts are edited for that reason.

[Caroline]

Why don't you remove posts that call me racist, or sexist. And say 'good post' yesterday when Jan accuses me of having no brain cells.

I was just agreeing with Scipio.And saying why Lookout posts incorrect facts without sources, asks for evidence and then ignores the evidence when it is posted

I was asking Lookout to provide links to her claims and you jumped on the bandwagon to try and antagonise - making some stupid comments about nightclubs. You know what you're doing Adam and you do it on purpose.

[Caroline]

Obviously Grahame was the worst offender. Calling me and Scipio names and thick on a regular basis.

I did email the moderators who said it would be wrong to ban him as he was not very well.

I PM'd two moderators after he said 'f--- off bitch' to another poster. One did not respond. The other said saying this did not warrant a ban.

He said that to me but apologised soon after. No one was calling anyone names tonight so why have a go at Lookout's age? Because that's what you were trying to do!

[marty]

Is that so?

Hahaha,quality, do I have a thousand obscenities left before I'm banned as well.

[Adam]

I am sure everyone agrees why Lookout refuses to accept the evidence.

So don't see why the reason should not be posted.

[Jane]

I don't know what Adam wrote, but I have seen people call other people xxxxxx,xxxxxxx xxxxxxx and such like, oh, but that's ok cause there posts are edited for the thousandth time.
Unless your gonna treat everyone the same the forums a nonsense.

Mike blows gaskets when he loses his cool. Adam fires poisonous darts for his own amusement and probably giggles whist he's doing it. Neither is acceptable.

[Adam]

He said that to me but apologised soon after. No one was calling anyone names tonight so why have a go at Lookout's age? Because that's what you were trying to do!

Not having a go at anyone's age.

Obviously in Lookouts case it relates to seeking attention. The easiest way to do it is to refuse to change stance and ignore the evidence.

[maggie]

Why don't you remove posts that call me racist, or sexist. And say 'good post' yesterday when Jan accuses me of having no brain cells.

I was just agreeing with Scipio.And saying why Lookout posts incorrect facts without sources, asks for evidence and then ignores the evidence when it is posted

I wasn't agreeing about your brain cells or lack of them I was speakingabout the point lookout made.  You are often sexist and ageist I am aware you are stirring and attention seeking.
I have given you lots of leeway, but youre asking be banned and I'm getting bored so just pack it in.

[Jane]

He said that to me but apologised soon after. No one was calling anyone names tonight so why have a go at Lookout's age? Because that's what you were trying to do!

MY God!!! Caroline it has to be the third or forth time Adam has used that particular post to excuse his most recent offence.

[Caroline]

Not having a go at anyone's age.

Obviously in Lookouts case it relates to seeking attention. The easiest way to do it is to refuse to change stance and ignore the evidence.

Yes you were Adam, hence the 'Nightclub' comment. No one seeks attention more than you. If yo feel as though you're being ignored, you start getting personal. Also starting posts with 'you must change your stance' is frankly getting old and is clearly goading.

[Adam]

I wasn't agreeing about your brain cells or lack of them I was speakingabout the point lookout made.  You are often sexist and ageist I am aware you are stirring and attention seeking.
I have given you lots of leeway, but youre asking be banned and I'm getting bored so just pack it in.

Can you give examples of how I am sexist or ageist please. This is a crime forum.

Otherwise I will have to make a complaint to NGB.

Thank you.

[Caroline]

Can you give examples of how I am sexist or ageist please. This is a crime forum.

Otherwise I will have to make a complaint to NGB.

Thank you.

You constantly have a go at Lookout about her age, denying that will be futile because we have ALL read it!