Book Reviews - Murders/Suicide at WHF

[vidvic]

Vic she is unbiased and she has edited Mikes posts and you yourself have congratulated her on that. So I am a bit bewildered by your reaction here? My post was in direct response to NN's post.

I'm missing your point Lugg, neither did you answer mine. How can 'old' and 'ancient' be edited in any seriousness??!!!

You inferred in your post that this was 'people' standing up to NN for things she said in the past. My point is that If true, then that's not the role of a mod.

[Lugg]

I'm missing your point Lugg, neither did you answer mine. How can 'old' and 'ancient' be edited in any seriousness??!!!

You inferred in your post that this was 'people' standing up to NN for things she said in the past. My point is that If true, then that's not the roll of a mod.

It is what she has said in her last post Vic. I really understand your point? I was referring to you hinting at Patti of being biased in her modding. I have just told you that she isn't, citing the editing of Mikes posts recently as an example. In which she was thanked by several people including you. So how can che be unbiased?

[vidvic]

Lugg, either I'm wording it poorly or you're not reading it right, but forget it! I'm not arguing with you.

[Lugg]

Lugg, either I'm wording it poorly or you're not reading it right, but forget it! I'm not arguing with you.

Well that makes a change. I really don't know what you're on about. Also you appear to be defending NN. Strange isn't it. Unless of course she is an anti bamber in disguise? Do you come on here just to create arguments and then fail to follow them through so you can accuse others of being argumentative? I don't get it?

[maggie]

I'm missing your point Lugg, neither did you answer mine. How can 'old' and 'ancient' be edited in any seriousness??!!!

You inferred in your post that this was 'people' standing up to NN for things she said in the past. My point is that If true, then that's not the role of a mod.

Hi Vic I think what was edited was ageist...ageism is pretty offensive and can be seen as bullying. Sometimes nipping situations in the bud is the role of a mod. Imo

[vidvic]

Well that makes a change. I really don't know what you're on about. Also you appear to be defending NN. Strange isn't it. Unless of course she is an anti bamber in disguise? Do you come on here just to create arguments and then fail to follow them through so you can accuse others of being argumentative? I don't get it?

Ah! It's about teams is it?! I'm not allowed to defend someone from the other side?

I'll spell it out for you Lugg. I think it laughable that 'old' and 'ancient' should be modded but unfounded allegations of illegal acts remain. From my little post bag that's materialised in the last few minutes, from pro's and anti's, I'd suggest, with respect, that many agree.

[vidvic]

Hi Vic I think what was edited was ageist...ageism is pretty offensive and can be seen as bullying. Sometimes nipping situations in the bud is the role of a mod. Imo

Alternatively it could be a 'joke'. Remember them?

[maggie]

Alternatively it could be a 'joke'. Remember them?

I think I can tell the difference Vic. Of course some people always make jokes at other people's expense.  Being offensive and personal and then calling it a 'joke' is bullying imo.

[Lugg]

Alternatively it could be a 'joke'. Remember them?

Well you certainly don't remember them thats for sure. My post was directed against NN who continues to carry on harping on an issue that we all thought to be settled. If you cannot see that kind of abuse, one who I fully expected to understand then who on here will? She has been continually offensive towards me from the very bewginning, without any reaction by myself, for what I can only describe as something within her own mind for I certainly gave her no reason to pick on me. Then when I complain to the mods, who expertly handled the situation. Instead of letting things boil over I am accused by her of being their friend and that was the reason they edited her post.
When I myself have tried my hardest to be civil on the forum. Then to cap it all I am used as an example so that you can complain about the biased ways of the moderators. What do you want from me Vic? All I can do is remind you that I too do not like some of Mikes posts. But what has that got to do with my answer to NN?

[vidvic]

I think I can tell the difference Vic. Of course some people always make jokes at other people's expense.  Being offensive and personal and then calling it a 'joke' is bullying imo.

But it's ok to attack the Eatons/Boutflours?

[vidvic]

Well you certainly don't remember them thats for sure. My post was directed against NN who continues to carry on harping on an issue that we all thought to be settled. If you cannot see that kind of abuse, one who I fully expected to understand then who on here will? She has been continually offensive towards me from the very bewginning, without any reaction by myself, for what I can only describe as something within her own mind for I certainly gave her no reason to pick on me. Then when I complain to the mods, who expertly handled the situation. Instead of letting things boil over I am accused by her of being their friend and that was the reason they edited her post.
When I myself have tried my hardest to be civil on the forum. Then to cap it all I am used as an example so that you can complain about the biased ways of the moderators. What do you want from me Vic? All I can do is remind you that I too do not like some of Mikes posts. But what has that got to do with my answer to NN?

Well, I would seem to have done you a favour then as you have now fully aired your views on NN.

[maggie]

But it's ok to attack the Eatons/Boutflours?

Vic, I have never said it was ok to attack the Eatons or the Boutflours or the people who died that night.  However, as this is an MOJ site supporting the belief that Jeremy Bamber  is innocent you cannot be surprised that such opinions are posted on here.  We mods are here to protect members from personal abuse etc., whether we do a good or bad job is up to everyone's personal opinion but we do our best.

[Lugg]

Well, I would seem to have done you a favour then as you have now fully aired your views on NN.

Well don't do me any more favours vic. I expected better from you. Seems I was wrong. Makes me wonder why you are not against this abuser?

[Lugg]

But it's ok to attack the Eatons/Boutflours?

How on earth can you come to that conclusion from what Maggie just said? Are you paranoid or what?

[killingeve]

Alternatively it could be a 'joke'. Remember them?

Ok for 'Maggie The Mod' to 'joke' about 'cuckoos' and yet 'old' and 'ancient' are deemed to be 'offensive' and require 'editing' by an 'impartial mod'.  Lofl.