Author Topic: Mike. Some questions.  (Read 29261 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Mike. Some questions.
« on: May 28, 2012, 12:57:PM »
Any chance of seeing the photo on the bed and/or the itemised phone bills from June/July 1985?

Do you know what happened to the copy that 'Z' handed in to the CCRC?

Why was it so important that 'Z' handed it in when you had a copy all along?

Why have you since 2010 posted many claims directly conflicting with a photo existing of Sheila, on the bed, with only one wound?

Why did you never mention this photo on either this forum or any of the previous two forums, set up to discuss the case?

Why does the defence team not make any reference to this photo or appear to delve into the matter further when it would fundemently discredit the prosecution case?

Why did GDS not claim it's existance when he was prepared to make various lurid claims?

How are you able to remember such specific details of the photo without referencing to it from your hard drives?

What exactly is the point of removing your phone battery to avoid detection when you were posting to this site your location minutes earlier?

Who exactly are you hiding from?

How did you know that the helicopters which you feared were following you, were on an exercise? Who did you phone to find out?

Why are you stalling on posting this material when you have posted so many other claims?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2012, 01:10:PM »
Jan 18th 2011.

it was during this same meeting, between Ewen and myself at his office in Birmingham, in 2003, that Ewen showed me an album of photographs which had not previously been disclosed to Jeremy or his legal team, which had been loaned to him by Essex police on the understanding that the contents remained confidential. To be specific, Ewen did not actually show me any of the pictures, he simply had them brought into the conference room where we were having our discussion, and he said that he was going out for five minutes, leaving me with the impression that he wanted me to look at the photographs in his absence.  This was when I saw the pantograph of Sheila on the bed...

I now think it was Ewen's way of showing me, that what Dr Craig had told him, was true, and that Sheila had been on the bed when he viewed her body at the scene, and not on the floor by the side of the bed...

When I spoke to Jeremy, on the phone that evening, I told him what Ewen had told me, and the fact that I had seen a picture of Sheila on the bed...

Weeks later, Jeremy disposed of the services of Ewen, and employed "Giovanni De Stafanno" (GDS), as his legal representative...

Apr 14th 2012

In 2004, Ewen Smith had an opportunity to visit Dr Craig, and at that time Ewen Smith found out that Sheila's body was on the bed at 8:44am, and that she only had one wound to her neck at that stage, and that Craig had confirmed her death at a time when she only had one wound, not two. I was told this by Ewen himself after he had visited Dr Craig and found this out. The reason why Ewen discussed this matter with me, was because I had seen the photograph of Sheila on the bed at Ewen's offices in Birmingham, and although he told me that the photograph album in which the said photograph existed had been loaned to him by Essex police on the proviso that he did not copy or reproduce any of the images contained within them, or to divulge its contents to any third party, the fact of the matter is that I was given an opportunity to view these whilst Ewen absented himself from his office. I made several visits to Ewens office between late 2003 and early 2004, and I was shown or given access to the photographs on at least two or three occasions during this period. I particularly remember at least three occasions when I saw these pictures, once when as I have said when Ewen absented himself from his office to allow me to look at the photographs, secondly when Ewen arranged for one of his partners (female who left to start up a new solicitors practice shortly afterwards)to show me them, and lastly when Ewen and myself had the conversation about Dr Craig and the relevance of the information which Ewen had managed to find out as a result of his visit to see, Dr Craig...

--------------------------------------

The above are two different postings from Mike, telling the story of how he came to see the picture on the bed with only one bullet wound.

Did Ewen show you the photo because he'd seen Dr Craig previously or did he tell you about Dr Craig because you'd already seen the photo?

Was it in 2003 or 2004?

How many times did you see it? Because your first post gives the distinct impression it was only once, where as the second says 3 times?

The last paragraph doesn't make sense and seems to refer to the same viewing visit twice?

Why were you allowed to see it again as after your first visit and you informing Bamber of what you'd seen, Bamber sacked Ewen. You surely were not popular in Ewen Smith's office after that?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2012, 01:15:PM »
Note: mike tesko stated he will post those bills once Jeremy's current CCRC application has been closed(i.e. with no further review of it possible). Also, mike tesko didn't say he had a copy of the image handed in to the CCRC by 'Z', only a copy of a different image that he'd "lost" years ago, having taken it from Ewen Smith without authorization (hence the secrecy). The alleged importance of the 'Z' image is that it clearly shows Sheila with only one wound (and hence alive); mike hadn't seen such an image until shown it by 'Z' recently, so GDS presumably didn't know about it.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #3 on: May 28, 2012, 01:21:PM »
Note: mike tesko stated he will post those bills once Jeremy's current CCRC application has been closed(i.e. with no further review of it possible). Also, mike tesko didn't say he had a copy of the image handed in to the CCRC by 'Z', only a copy of a different image that he'd "lost" years ago, having taken it from Ewen Smith without authorization (hence the secrecy). The alleged importance of the 'Z' image is that it clearly shows Sheila with only one wound (and hence alive); mike hadn't seen such an image until shown it by 'Z' recently, so GDS presumably didn't know about it.

nope. Mike clearly says the Ewen Smith photo shows only one wound.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2012, 01:28:PM »
It may have shown one wound, but the later image (from 'Z') allegedly shows the location of the second wound, with that wound not present, a subtle but crucial difference.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2012, 01:51:PM »
Mike,,I should have put my question to you on this thread,not to worry,here goes anyway.
Is there any possible chance you can find out how often Ralph had to get the assistance of Jeremy to help restrain Sheila when she used to " kick off ",,as seemingly if Jeremy wasn't in Ralph's presence,Ralph would phone Jeremy for help to calm her down.
It would be interesting to find out how many times this happened over a period of weeks/months.
Chances are,,nobody would have known about these episodes.

I think this is why the police assumed that it was a " domestic ". Could have been a reason why Ralph had their personal alarm fitted,,as Sheila used to threaten the family.

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2012, 02:45:PM »
nope. Mike clearly says the Ewen Smith photo shows only one wound.
Do you believe Dr Craig , told ES , SC body was on the bed when he saw it ?
What do you make of AE also saying ' a policeman told her SC was found on the bed ' ?

Offline lebaleb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 884
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2012, 03:44:PM »
I think it's all a misunderstanding of the term on the left/right side of the bed.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2012, 03:49:PM »
Do you believe Dr Craig , told ES , SC body was on the bed when he saw it ?
What do you make of AE also saying ' a policeman told her SC was found on the bed ' ?

There is currently no evidence to suggest Sheila was ever on the bed, let alone shot only once.

Mike, in his original story, mentions that Dr Craig's words were 'translated' by his wife and therfore Ewen believed it was not very good evidence, but who know's whether this is true or not.

Ann, I believe was told by a policeman that Sheila was found on the bed, which she noted, but all subsequent information seems to suggest this was wrong.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #9 on: May 28, 2012, 03:58:PM »
There is currently no evidence to suggest Sheila was ever on the bed, let alone shot only once.

Mike, in his original story, mentions that Dr Craig's words were 'translated' by his wife and therfore Ewen believed it was not very good evidence, but who know's whether this is true or not.

Ann, I believe was told by a policeman that Sheila was found on the bed, which she noted, but all subsequent information seems to suggest this was wrong.
Do you know if AE told JM , what she was told ?

guest154

  • Guest
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #10 on: May 28, 2012, 04:19:PM »
What I've never been able to understand is if Essex police were trying to keep this whole thing covered up and elaking - why would they give the photos to Jeremy's solicitor - sounds crazy to me. Even if they told him he can't show/tell people - just seems a bit pointless and as if they shot themselves in the foot.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #11 on: May 28, 2012, 04:33:PM »
Do you know if AE told JM , what she was told ?

No, I don't know.

What's your feeling regarding reply#1 ?
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline Bridget

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5065
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #12 on: May 28, 2012, 05:05:PM »
There is currently no evidence to suggest Sheila was ever on the bed, let alone shot only once.

Mike, in his original story, mentions that Dr Craig's words were 'translated' by his wife and therfore Ewen believed it was not very good evidence, but who know's whether this is true or not.
Ann, I believe was told by a policeman that Sheila was found on the bed, which she noted, but all subsequent information seems to suggest this was wrong.

What do you mean by 'translated by his wife' Vic?
....just cos I eat worms...

Offline jon

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1437
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #13 on: May 28, 2012, 05:52:PM »
No, I don't know.

What's your feeling regarding reply#1 ?
My feeling is , he post's certain stuff to draw people out and into debate , i may well be wrong mind , do you think it strange that AE and JM claimed they were told , SC was found on the bed , then the police officer AE claimed told her , denied doing so , where do you believe the truth lay's ?

Offline tonyb

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1235
  • Time to disembark the magical mystery tour...
Re: Mike. Some questions.
« Reply #14 on: May 28, 2012, 06:10:PM »
My feeling is , he post's certain stuff to draw people out and into debate , i may well be wrong mind , do you think it strange that AE and JM claimed they were told , SC was found on the bed , then the police officer AE claimed told her , denied doing so , where do you believe the truth lay's ?
My feeling is that Mikes been caught out by his ownxxxxxxx. The hole he's dug himself into is so deep,he appears to be unable to see the light...  IF he had the photo of SC on the bed that alone MAY unlock JBs cell. Instead he withholds key evidence ( and let's face it,he's always moaning about non disclosed evidence,correctly I may add ) which makes him as bad,if not worse than EP. Unless your a Lemming it's plain to see that local call itemissed billing wasn't available at the time so that will never see the light of day.
I must say,if Mike stuck to FACTS he'd surely have a more compliant flock,so to speak.

« Last Edit: June 05, 2012, 07:49:PM by Chochok Eira »
Don't enjoy the cold weather.