you can't fool me - police surgeon, Dr Craig, got it so terribly wrong...

[Bridget]

Does it not strike anybody as strange that in the still the blood is completely different to the other photos? If these photos were taken around the same time why does there seem to be so much more blood around!

Do you mean photos of Sheila?

[mike tesko]

And there was me thinking you were ignoring me..... :D
It is worth retracting my abstinence now were on talking terms
Thanks Mike xx

Welcome back ye old friend...

[mike tesko]

There are several areas of directional bloodstaining which need to be explained:-

(1) - blood around lower entry wound
(2) - blood around Sheila's mouth
(3) - blood around he left nostril and into her left eye socket
(4) - blood around the upper entry wound
(5) - expiated blood on the front upper right hand side of nightdress
(6) - triangular bloodstain on upper right shoulder area
(7) - blood runs on Sheila's right arm
(8) - blood on top of Sheila's right hand
(9) - blood on hem of nightdress
(10) - bloodied fingermarks around upper entry wound

[Patti]

We can only think Mike, we need a medical person....but I will give my opinion.

1, runs two ways. 1st flow is downwards and watery. This could be because she has brought her arm up to her wound, hence the vertical trails of blood on her arms.

2, The bullet had fragmented into the throat, which may have brought blood up into to mouth, she must have fell back at this stage, she could have coughed and blood ran from both sides of her mouth.

3, this could be from a sudden jolt or her head may have been lifted.

4, This was a close contact wound, it runs to her right, which suggests she was on her right hand side when she received the shot.

5,  This was due to her being on her right side and possibly from her first wound.

6, From her right side it has soaked through to her right shoulder.

7/8, This could be caused form her 1st wound has she brought her arm up to her neck.

9, No idea....She only had a small amount of blood in her uterus.  But a very good one to debate on.

10,  This was a close contact would, so the muzzle could have caused this....I doubt it was a finger mark...

Next lol

[ajross]

Do you mean photos of Sheila?

Yes, Mike once posted a photo of Sheila he said was a still from a crime scene video. I asked him to repost it and he did on the previous page of this thread along with the photo and edited photo of the gun shot wounds, I just find it strange that in the still there seems to be a greater mass of blood around the wounds. Unfortunately I also once asked him if he had ever watched the video or if he had it but he didn't reply

[Bridget]

Yes, Mike once posted a photo of Sheila he said was a still from a crime scene video. I asked him to repost it and he did on the previous page of this thread along with the photo and edited photo of the gun shot wounds, I just find it strange that in the still there seems to be a greater mass of blood around the wounds. Unfortunately I also once asked him if he had ever watched the video or if he had it but he didn't reply

Oh ok, yes - that still is a bit of a mystery. The consensus seems to be that it is Sheila, but the context of it is unknown. It was from a documentary in which actresses were also used.

[ajross]

Oh right, that is different to what I thought Mike told me, I was of the impressionis it was some form of police video but that does not mean I am disputing what either of you have said, I probably just misunderstood.

[Bridget]

Oh right, that is different to what I thought Mike told me, I was of the impressionis it was some form of police video but that does not mean I am disputing what either of you have said, I probably just misunderstood.

It could be a police video, no one seems to know.