How I Iost the photo` of Sheila on the Bed...

[grahameb]

A photo of the hard drive that contains the photo of Sheila on the bed. Cool.

What caught my eye is the bar code on the hard drive. It couldn't be that old if it has that. Just shove it in your present computer Mike, set the thing to "slave" instead of "master" and hay presto you have your picture. You could even upload it onto the forum. Hard drives do look a bit boring on their own don't they.

[Roch]

The 'drama' surrounding this photo has been long drawn out, drip fed and potentially counter-productive.  No offence intended Mike, I realise this is your forum.  Maybe the time has come to deliver the goods or forever hold your peace?

[Bridget]

The photograph of Sheila on the bed exists, I only removed one such photograph from the album when I visited Ewens office in 2004, there could have been others in the same album but I didn't look at all the pictures. The purpose of removing the photograph was with the specific intention of sending it to Jeremy, which is what I did. Of course, I did scan the image and retained it on a computer I was using at the time, I did this the same evening I returned from Ewens office in Birmingham...

The pictures you have posted of the hard drive indicate that it is using Vista V1, which wasn't released in the USA until 2006, and worldwide November 2007.

[mike tesko]

The pictures you have posted of the hard drive indicate that it is using Vista V1, which wasn't released in the USA until 2006, and worldwide November 2007.

Hard drive contains image of Sheila on bed copied from original hard drive currently in possession of another (in storage). I am trying to obtain original hard drive later on today, and will photograph it similarly...

A copy of the image of Sheila on the bed will therefore be on both hard drives, the origonal one I scanned at the material time, and the second one (already photographed) I copied...

[mertol22]

What caught my eye is the bar code on the hard drive. It couldn't be that old if it has that. Just shove it in your present computer Mike, set the thing to "slave" instead of "master" and hay presto you have your picture. You could even upload it onto the forum. Hard drives do look a bit boring on their own don't they.

If the CCRC have already seen the picture it would be pointless re submitting it they will reject again or ignore, on the front cover of a large tabloid  might not be easy to file away.

[tonyb]

Hard drive contains image of Sheila on bed copied from original hard drive currently in possession of another (in storage). I am trying to obtain original hard drive later on today, and will photograph it similarly...

A copy of the image of Sheila on the bed will therefore be on both hard drives, the origonal one I scanned at the material time, and the second one (already photographed) I copied...

So now the pics of the hard drive ard copied onto this hard drive. So is one in storage and this one is going into storage. I'm getting confused.  ..... Or bullshitted...

[Bridget]

Hard drive contains image of Sheila on bed copied from original hard drive currently in possession of another (in storage). I am trying to obtain original hard drive later on today, and will photograph it similarly...

A copy of the image of Sheila on the bed will therefore be on both hard drives, the origonal one I scanned at the material time, and the second one (already photographed) I copied...

Oh ok, you didn't mention that before. Good news that it's on at least two hard drives, and that one that you have there is so recent that it will be a simple job to install and access it.

[susan]

Hi Mike  I am with you on this one re: the photo on the bed and the hard drive.  I cannot see what you would achieve by making it up as some have implied on the forum.  Well done for all the hard work you are doing.  I don,t think you deserve to be interrogated in this way.  Lets wait and see.

[tonyb]

Oh ok, you didn't mention that before. Good news that it's on at least two hard drives, and that one that you have there is so recent that it will be a simple job to install and access it.

So simple it took 12(?) days to come up with a new twist. Mike says he needs a special cable to download images and is putting it in storage until he can get one. This os the reason he gave fo being unable to download it of his original drive... It appears,IMO,from mikes post 9.01am that he is in fact talking about the original hard drive and using photographic licence by showing pictures that have been"stage managed". This is really not the route that should be taken when one of the major arguments of your own defence scenario involve SOC pictures & videos missing/withheld similar to what MT himself is doing.
So what reason has MT got for withholding this picture?
1 it doesn't exist.
2 it does exist but he hasn't kept a copy
3 it does exist,he's kept a copy but can't extract it
4 it does exist,he's kept a copy,can extract but won't share it
There will be more depending on your point of view, so come on. Add to the list.

[Bridget]

So simple it took 12(?) days to come up with a new twist. Mike says he needs a special cable to download images and is putting it in storage until he can get one. This os the reason he gave fo being unable to download it of his original drive... It appears,IMO,from mikes post 9.01am that he is in fact talking about the original hard drive and using photographic licence by showing pictures that have been"stage managed". This is really not the route that should be taken when one of the major arguments of your own defence scenario involve SOC pictures & videos missing/withheld similar to what MT himself is doing.
So what reason has MT got for withholding this picture?
1 it doesn't exist.
2 it does exist but he hasn't kept a copy
3 it does exist,he's kept a copy but can't extract it
4 it does exist,he's kept a copy,can extract but won't share it
There will be more depending on your point of view, so come on. Add to the list.

Well yes, because at 9.01 he said "Here are some photographs of the hard drive which contains a scanned copy of the picture I have been speaking about" and it now appears that what is on this hard drive is another copy of the scanned copy etc... But let's not be picky, it will be easy enough for him to post now.

[tonyb]

Well yes, because at 9.01 he said "Here are some photographs of the hard drive which contains a scanned copy of the picture I have been speaking about" and it now appears that what is on this hard drive is another copy of the scanned copy etc... But let's not be picky, it will be easy enough for him to post now.

True

[bob]

Here are some photographs of the hard drive which contains a scanned copy of the picture I have been speaking about. I am taking steps to place it somewhere in safe hands (this very day), out of harms way, until I can get hold of a cable, to allow me to download the relevant file from it...

Miike - about 10 days ago I posted you two links to Amazon where you could buy exactly the cable you needed. You could therefore have been in posession of this cable about 9 days ago. One might have thought something this important would have deserved your intention - unless you are on yet another of your wind-ups of course? 

[bob]

I don't want to spoil whatever odd enjoyment you're getting out of this game Mike, but the disk you have posted a picture of is a SATA disk (i.e. it uses a modern interface), and could therefore simply be plugged into the spare cable inside your modern PC and read directly.

Furthermore, the disk you claim to have in archive, would have been an IDE disk. You therefore could not have backed this up to the SATA disk without a suitable interface cable (or external disk housing). So you must already have the cable you need to read it.

I just don't get why you keep playing these games, and have even less idea why people still believe you - especially the old timers who've been through this so many times before 

[tonyb]

I don't want to spoil whatever odd enjoyment you're getting out of this game Mike, but the disk you have posted a picture of is a SATA disk (i.e. it uses a modern interface), and could therefore simply be plugged into the spare cable inside your modern PC and read directly.

Furthermore, the disk you claim to have in archive, would have been an IDE disk. You therefore could not have backed this up to the SATA disk without a suitable interface cable (or external disk housing). So you must already have the cable you need to read it.

I just don't get why you keep playing these games, and have even less idea why people still believe you - especially the old timers who've been through this so many times before 

+ one Bob. The absence of certain ( lets keep the tradition up....) un-named forum members who would normally be in support of you on this one mike shows how embarrassed they must be reading the thread,watching you dig a bigger and bigger hole for yourself.
I must state for the record I'm not Anti-Mike Tesko in any way,shape and form. I'm simply anti bulllshit. I believe Bullshit deflects from the very good threads that are produced and disseminates any quality into rubbish
Haven't a clue why it happens but that's life I suppose, and don't forget, for some,Life could well mean Life.
Time to cut the Bullshit...

[bob]

+ one Bob. The absence of certain ( lets keep the tradition up....) un-named forum members who would normally be in support of you on this one mike shows how embarrassed they must be reading the thread,watching you dig a bigger and bigger hole for yourself.
I must state for the record I'm not Anti-Mike Tesko in any way,shape and form. I'm simply anti bulllshit. I believe Bullshit deflects from the very good threads that are produced and disseminates any quality into rubbish
Haven't a clue why it happens but that's life I suppose, and don't forget, for some,Life could well mean Life.
Time to cut the Bullshit...

I feel the same way Tony - I took Mike at his work and sent him links to get those cables - they could have been delivered within 24 hours and the image posted onto the forum an hour after that. He ignored my post, so I posted a few days later to remind him in case he had missed my post - again I was ignored. Then this latest "revelation" appears. I'm afraid you can only suspend your disbelief so far, and mine's past stretching point. The problem is, it casts doubt over everything else Mike claims as first-hand information