How I Iost the photo` of Sheila on the Bed...

[grahameb]

Grahame, it's only a matter of time now before mike lifts it from the old hard drive and we'll all see it.

It doesn't matter Vic. We have at least two witnesses that it exists and what makes it more intriguing is the fact that Mike believes JB is innocent and Mat believes him to be guilty.

[mertol22]

A long topic and a lively one scattered among the postings reference is made to Sheila on the bed body on the bed  when i read Sheila are we saying she was still alive ?

[grahameb]

I see the picture as a can of worms.....and I wouldn't like to be working for the defence or the CCRC if it was to come out.

Too much work and so much speculation.

It doesn't really matter what we think Mat. If what you say is true and because of what you have just said that you see it as a can of worms and that you were reluctant to say anything about it, means that there is every possibility that the picture/s exist and if it/they does/do, then this means that it must be counted among the evidence that was witheld from the court at the original trial.

[grahameb]

A long topic and a lively one scattered among the postings reference is made to Sheila on the bed body on the bed  when i read Sheila are we saying she was still alive ?

Possible not Mertol. But then again what would be the main reason for moving someone from a soft surface to a hard surface?

[mertol22]

It doesn't really matter what we think Mat. If what you say is true and because of what you have just said that you see it as a can of worms and that you were reluctant to say anything about it, means that there is every possibility that the picture/s exist and if it/they does/do, then this means that it must be counted among the evidence that was witheld from the court at the original trial.

Sorry to butt in the picture would offer a different version of events that day and given the nature of those events a man was convicted on the known events and that simply is not acceptable.

[grahameb]

Sorry to butt in the picture would offer a different version of events that day and given the nature of those events a man was convicted on the known events and that simply is not acceptable.

Persacerly.

[mertol22]

Possible not Mertol. But then again what would be the main reason for moving someone from a soft surface to a hard surface?

There is general evidence to point that Sheila s 1st shot may not have been fatal.

[Bridget]

I don't know why it was stolen by Mike. The problem I have is .. my co-worker (God it's hard to answer these questions yet keep some anonminty.) ... my co-worker who is ......affiliated with certain government bodies saw this photo in 1993.

So I don't know where it is. I don't know why you don't all have it.

And I can't see how the defence do not have it. Seriously because if my co worker saw it.....It didn't come from the police.

If we take everyone at their word, presumably the reason why the defence don't have it is because Mike stole it and then forgot about it for a few years.

[grahameb]

If we take everyone at their word,

Strange that you should mention that Bridget. That is precisely what the Jury did who convicted Jeremy.

[Bridget]

Strange that you should mention that Bridget. That is precisely what the Jury did who convicted Jeremy.

Apart from Jeremy's.

[grahameb]

Apart from Jeremy's.

Granted.

[tonyb]

Actually, I will just speak up because Mike is being called a liar.

There is a photo of Sheila on the bed at some stage, it could be at ANY stage of the day. I haven't seen it but my co-worker has. There could be more than one picture, I expect there is.

I provided a detailed description of it a few pages back.

I didn't say outright because of the abuse people get when they say something as big as what I am claiming.

I'm not sure Mike's being called a liar. I for one find it frustrating when he states something as fact,paints himself into a corner with a lack of tangible proof and goes quiet on the subject...

[ajross]

Is there any more news on extracting this from the computer yet?

[lebaleb]

Even if the photo comes to light I'm sure the authorities will find a way to explain it... e.g. She was moved to the bed from the floor to examine the floor under the body...etc.

[grahameb]

Even if the photo comes to light I'm sure the authorities will find a way to explain it... e.g. She was moved to the bed from the floor to examine the floor under the body...etc.

It really doesn't matter, as I said before it will still count was new evidence as it will immediately throw the former evidence and picture into doubt. Since every police officer testified that Sheila was on the bed. This single picture will immediately throw their testimonies into doubt for the simple reason that no one has mentioned that Sheila was on the bed at any time. In fact the very fact that every one of their statements agree contradicts this new picture. If it exists that is?