How I Iost the photo` of Sheila on the Bed...

[grahameb]

Actually, I will just speak up because Mike is being called a liar.

There is a photo of Sheila on the bed at some stage, it could be at ANY stage of the day. I haven't seen it but my co-worker has. There could be more than one picture, I expect there is.

I provided a detailed description of it a few pages back.

I didn't say outright because of the abuse people get when they say something as big as what I am claiming.

Thank you Mat for backing up Mike. That means that Mike is not a liar as some think. I can't promise you a soft ride though?

[guest154]

I'm not expecting one! haha

[Nuala]

Actually, I will just speak up because Mike is being called a liar.

There is a photo of Sheila on the bed at some stage, it could be at ANY stage of the day. I haven't seen it but my co-worker has. There could be more than one picture, I expect there is.

I provided a detailed description of it a few pages back.

I didn't say outright because of the abuse people get when they say something as big as what I am claiming.

Thank you, Mat!

Do you know why this picture is being witheld?

Where is this picture?

Can we get a copy of this?

[grahameb]

So now we have 3 witnesses who know that Sheila was on the bed at some stage when the soc officers were present 4 if you count Z. (1) Mrs. Ann Eaton (2) Mike (3) Mat. The question still remains, when she was moved and why she was moved?

[vidvic]

And, if you and your co-worker have seen it, why did mike have to steal it?


Because it was witheld from Jeremy and the defence, Vic, and because Mike wants justice done, I would think.

[vidvic]

Nope Grahame, back to two. Ann heard it. She never witnessed it.

[grahameb]

And, if you and your co-worker have seen it, why did mike have to steal it?

There was probably more than one Vic. The real problen is why was it witheld?

[guest154]

I don't know why it was stolen by Mike. The problem I have is .. my co-worker (God it's hard to answer these questions yet keep some anonminty.) ... my co-worker who is ......affiliated with certain government bodies saw this photo in 1993.

So I don't know where it is. I don't know why you don't all have it.

And I can't see how the defence do not have it. Seriously because if my co worker saw it.....It didn't come from the police.

[vidvic]

Exactly. It makes no sense. I don't believe it exists.

[grahameb]

I don't know why it was stolen by Mike. The problem I have is .. my co-worker (God it's hard to answer these questions yet keep some anonminty.) ... my co-worker who is ......affiliated with certain government bodies saw this photo in 1993.

So I don't know where it is. I don't know why you don't all have it.

And I can't see how the defence do not have it. Seriously because if my co worker saw it.....It didn't come from the police.

You see the value of this picture don't you Mat? It doesn't matter when Sheila's body was on the bed. It constitutes new evidence. Its for the lawyers to argue times etc.

[guest154]

I see the picture as a can of worms.....and I wouldn't like to be working for the defence or the CCRC if it was to come out.

Too much work and so much speculation.

[vidvic]

Grahame, it's only a matter of time now before mike lifts it from the old hard drive and we'll all see it.

[Nuala]

You see the value of this picture don't you Mat? It doesn't matter when Sheila's body was on the bed. It constitutes new evidence. Its for the lawyers to argue times etc.

Why would Mat lie? There's no reason for him to do so. I believe him.

[grahameb]

Nope Grahame, back to two. Ann heard it. She never witnessed it.

Hi Vic. But she still gave that evidence in her statement that a police office told her that Sheila was on the bed. In any case two or three witnesses is counted in court as one backs up the other. How come the rest of Mrs. Eaton's evidence is accepted except that bit?

[Bridget]

You see the value of this picture don't you Mat? It doesn't matter when Sheila's body was on the bed. It constitutes new evidence. Its for the lawyers to argue times etc.

Very true. It would certainly make for an interesting conversation.