Itemised phone bills

[vidvic]

Pam Boutflour said she did.

[tonyb]

whereas...

I completely disagree, there was no evidence to back up anything you say about this matter during the trial or any subsequent appeal it is all speculation on your part, I am afraid...

Point me in the direction of any relevant exhibit containing any evidence to support your view...

This is now simple
Mike,
Point me in the direction of any relevant exhibit containing any evidence to support your view...
The photo or itemised bill should do the trick nicely.....

[Patti]

Mike I am sure I read somewhere that BT confirmed that Jeremy had made a call from a telephone box at 5am ish on the 7th Aug?

If they could do that then I am sure they could have tracked a call from WHF that night....I read the history of itemised calls and there was none at that time.....Billing yes, but the bills did not have itemised calls on them.....Not sure about a business line.

[vidvic]

It's quite simple mike.

You claimed you had them, then stalled until after the ccrc decision, now you're stalling again. We are not children. Either put up or admit you don't have them.

Same with your quite ridiculous story about the photo on the bed with one wound. You are treating intelligent people as fools.

[Patti]

The telephone information are in a document AD.C.I Ainsley.  There must have been a check done to determine that the office telephone was used by an officer of TFG at a particular time.....Which I find strange, because why did they not determine the time Jeremy phoned the police and Julie...Odd.

[NewChilledOutHartley]

It's quite simple mike.

You claimed you had them, then stalled until after the ccrc decision, now you're stalling again. We are not children. Either put up or admit you don't have them.

Same with your quite ridiculous story about the photo on the bed with one wound. You are treating intelligent people as fools.

Unfortunately we're also treating fools as intelligent people. 

[Bridget]

Mike I am sure I read somewhere that BT confirmed that Jeremy had made a call from a telephone box at 5am ish on the 7th Aug?

If they could do that then I am sure they could have tracked a call from WHF that night....I read the history of itemised calls and there was none at that time.....Billing yes, but the bills did not have itemised calls on them.....Not sure about a business line.

I'm not saying you're wrong but the 5 am call has never been in dispute, in fact I think the police drove him to the box. Why would bt be asked to confirm it?

[mike tesko]

It's quite simple mike.

You claimed you had them, then stalled until after the ccrc decision, now you're stalling again. We are not children. Either put up or admit you don't have them.

Same with your quite ridiculous story about the photo on the bed with one wound. You are treating intelligent people as fools.

you are making a fool of yourself, without any help from me...

[NewChilledOutHartley]

you are making a fool of yourself, without any help from me...

Deja vu? 

[susan]

Patti  forgive my ignorance but why would Jeremy make a call from a telephone box.

[vidvic]

you are making a fool of yourself, without any help from me...

Actually I think most people on here would agree with me on this, whatever side of the argument they're on.

Where are they both then?

[Bridget]

Patti  forgive my ignorance but why would Jeremy make a call from a telephone box.

He wanted to call Julie.

[vidvic]

It's quite simple mike.

You claimed you had them, then stalled until after the ccrc decision, now you're stalling again. We are not children. Either put up or admit you don't have them.

Same with your quite ridiculous story about the photo on the bed with one wound. You are treating intelligent people as fools.

Didn't you suggest you were going to post last night?

[simong]

Mike I am sure I read somewhere that BT confirmed that Jeremy had made a call from a telephone box at 5am ish on the 7th Aug?

If they could do that then I am sure they could have tracked a call from WHF that night....I read the history of itemised calls and there was none at that time.....Billing yes, but the bills did not have itemised calls on them.....Not sure about a business line.

The call to Julie in London from the phone box, was long distance (trunk). The phone box would charge as per whether the call was local/ trunk or international. All trunk and international calls could be itemised at the time, but not local calls.

[Patti]

The call to Julie in London from the phone box, was long distance (trunk). The phone box would charge as per whether the call was local/ trunk or international. All trunk and international calls could be itemised at the time, but not local calls.

Hi Si I think you are right on that....