Interesting Pic

[tonyb]

Yes they do...

Sorry mike I only work the big tents, not the pantomime you are staring in (" the itemised billing ") You have been informed many occasions that itemised billing was not available for local calls yet you chose to ignore the FACTS. You must PROVE to the forum beyond a reasonable doubt (?) that such items (as others) exist to get the credibility in the threads that you otherwise lack

[vidvic]

Yes they do...

Complete and utter bollocks.

[mike tesko]

There you go assuming mike.

You are assuming that silencer has any connection whatsoever to the murders....

Silencer (SBJ/1)was used during training exercise to prod bodies of victims, and that was why DS Jones took possession of it from the scene on 7th August 1985 along with three other exhibits he took possession of that day (SBJ/4, SBJ/3 and SBJ/2)...

So...

Where is the exhibit label for this silencer?

[mike tesko]

Complete and utter bollocks.

Yes, that is what your talking...

[tonyb]

Where is the exhibit label that is supposed to be attached to the silencer?

I can see the one on the rifle, but the one (or two) for the silencer is missing altogether...

Why would you need a label? The guns not broken down. Surely the label on the stock is for the item as presented?

[mike tesko]

Why would you need a label? The guns not broken down. Surely the label on the stock is for the item as presented?

Sorry, are you real, what do you mean why would you need a label?

Do you know anything at all about an exhibits integrity?

[tonyb]

Silencer (SBJ/1)was used during training exercise to prod bodies of victims, and that was why DS Jones took possession of it from the scene on 7th August 1985 along with three other exhibits he took possession of that day (SBJ/4, SBJ/3 and SBJ/2)...

So...

Where is the exhibit label for this silencer?

Where's the label for the sights?

[mike tesko]

Where's the label for the sights?

Exactly, where is that signed exhibit label?

[vidvic]

Silencer (SBJ/1)was used during training exercise to prod bodies of victims, and that was why DS Jones took possession of it from the scene on 7th August 1985 along with three other exhibits he took possession of that day (SBJ/4, SBJ/3 and SBJ/2)...

So...

Where is the exhibit label for this silencer?

I'll be very clear for you mike.

How do you know that the silencer in this photograph has any connection, whatsoever, with the crime?

[tonyb]

Sorry, are you real, what do you mean why would you need a label?

Do you know anything at all about an exhibits integrity?

No. What is the need to label component parts of one item, ie rifle complete with sights and silencer?

[mike tesko]

By the time DS Davidson took the rifle and silencer and telescopic site to photographs it in the gun cupboard, all manner of witnesses had handled, examined and been shown the silencer in question, all signed an exhibit label for the silencer(s), yet this crucial exhibit label is missing from the silencer at this crucial time - what did DS Davidson do with the exhibit labels in question?

[tonyb]

By the time DS Davidson took the rifle and silencer and telescopic site to photographs it in the gun cupboard, all manner of witnesses had handled, examined and been shown the silencer in question, all signed an exhibit label for the silencer(s), yet this crucial exhibit label is missing from the silencer at this crucial time - what did DS Davidson do with the exhibit labels in question?

Where is the label for the silencer then. You don't seem to concerned about that one?

[vidvic]

I'll try again. How do you know that this silencer is anything whatsoever to do with the crime? It's not a difficult question.

[tonyb]

Where is the label for the silencer then. You don't seem to concerned about that one?

Sorry sights. Typo

[JackiePreece]

Bit tetchy this morning Vic
Wonder why?