Author Topic: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)  (Read 32548 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #120 on: December 04, 2011, 07:06:PM »
How did Wilkes come by this ScINtillating, tittilating tittle-tattle? Paradoxically not from MISS MARPLES.    No, by elementary deduction, following Sherlock Holmes mentor -JB-, IT WAS STRAIGHT FROM the HORSES MOUTH. We can attribute it to STAN the MAN, no less the intrepid TROTTER Hercules from the corrupt AUGEAN STABLES.      hmm hmm  FOOW FOOW


Hi Campion, I'm greatly enjoying your cryptic postings. Just one problem: some parts are a little too cryptic for a tired mind to follow. Any chance of a translation?
I was following completely Keira. You need to do the Times crossword. ;D



Fair point. The only part I really don't follow is: who spoke to Stan the man?

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #121 on: December 04, 2011, 07:08:PM »
How did Wilkes come by this ScINtillating, tittilating tittle-tattle? Paradoxically not from MISS MARPLES.    No, by elementary deduction, following Sherlock Holmes mentor -JB-, IT WAS STRAIGHT FROM the HORSES MOUTH. We can attribute it to STAN the MAN, no less the intrepid TROTTER Hercules from the corrupt AUGEAN STABLES.      hmm hmm  FOOW FOOW


Hi Campion, I'm greatly enjoying your cryptic postings. Just one problem: some parts are a little too cryptic for a tired mind to follow. Any chance of a translation?
I was following completely Keira. You need to do the Times crossword. ;D



Fair point. The only part I really don't follow is: who spoke to Stan the man?


Foow Foow, or Wilkes?

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #122 on: December 04, 2011, 07:10:PM »
How did Wilkes come by this ScINtillating, tittilating tittle-tattle? Paradoxically not from MISS MARPLES.    No, by elementary deduction, following Sherlock Holmes mentor -JB-, IT WAS STRAIGHT FROM the HORSES MOUTH. We can attribute it to STAN the MAN, no less the intrepid TROTTER Hercules from the corrupt AUGEAN STABLES.      hmm hmm  FOOW FOOW


Hi Campion, I'm greatly enjoying your cryptic postings. Just one problem: some parts are a little too cryptic for a tired mind to follow. Any chance of a translation?
I was following completely Keira. You need to do the Times crossword. ;D



Fair point. The only part I really don't follow is: who spoke to Stan the man?


Foow Foow, or Wilkes?


It's Stan the man, isn't it? So where does Foow Foow come into it?

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #123 on: December 04, 2011, 07:10:PM »
How did Wilkes come by this ScINtillating, tittilating tittle-tattle? Paradoxically not from MISS MARPLES.    No, by elementary deduction, following Sherlock Holmes mentor -JB-, IT WAS STRAIGHT FROM the HORSES MOUTH. We can attribute it to STAN the MAN, no less the intrepid TROTTER Hercules from the corrupt AUGEAN STABLES.      hmm hmm  FOOW FOOW


Hi Campion, I'm greatly enjoying your cryptic postings. Just one problem: some parts are a little too cryptic for a tired mind to follow. Any chance of a translation?
I was following completely Keira. You need to do the Times crossword. ;D



Fair point. The only part I really don't follow is: who spoke to Stan the man?


Foow Foow, or Wilkes?
No. Woof woof as I said. As Jeremy calls him. Journalist?

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #124 on: December 04, 2011, 07:13:PM »
"I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)

If she said that, that is exactly what she did. (No surprise!) Her thirty-something meetings with the Essex police, hmmm, wonder what they were for?

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #125 on: December 04, 2011, 07:16:PM »
How did Wilkes come by this ScINtillating, tittilating tittle-tattle? Paradoxically not from MISS MARPLES.    No, by elementary deduction, following Sherlock Holmes mentor -JB-, IT WAS STRAIGHT FROM the HORSES MOUTH. We can attribute it to STAN the MAN, no less the intrepid TROTTER Hercules from the corrupt AUGEAN STABLES.      hmm hmm  FOOW FOOW


Hi Campion, I'm greatly enjoying your cryptic postings. Just one problem: some parts are a little too cryptic for a tired mind to follow. Any chance of a translation?
I was following completely Keira. You need to do the Times crossword. ;D



Fair point. The only part I really don't follow is: who spoke to Stan the man?


Foow Foow, or Wilkes?
No. Woof woof as I said. As Jeremy calls him. Journalist?


I understand who Foow Foow is, I'm just trying to use the lingo.

So where does Foow Foow - or Woof Woof - come into it?

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #126 on: December 04, 2011, 07:16:PM »
"I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)

If she said that, that is exactly what she did. (No surprise!) Her thirty-something meetings with the Essex police, hmmm, wonder what they were for?


Hi, Abs! Good to see you.

Exactly

Offline Alias

  • Editor
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 9435
  • What is in those 200 boxes?
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #127 on: December 04, 2011, 07:20:PM »
Hi chocho!! I see we can´t +1 anymore, so you get one in my mind.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #128 on: December 04, 2011, 07:24:PM »
Hi chocho!! I see we can´t +1 anymore, so you get one in my mind.

Same here, I'm sending +1 in my mind to you!

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #129 on: December 05, 2011, 11:49:AM »
KEIRA,  That is the Question 2 B or not 2B. ??  iT'S  'X' 'Y' and / or 'Z' . i.e. MUGGY ,  LIZzz, possiby one other  party.  GRAHAME is right-on,- FOOW FOOW can be reversed, unlike  BOB and RADAR, otherwise RAINWATERBUT-RWB- , where poor Mr Page allegedly had a heart attack before immersing himself in water. Soget insurance and Christian internment.

Offline campion

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1967
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #130 on: December 05, 2011, 12:15:PM »
Apologies ALL, re earlier POST. Buddy's OUIJA board made . CRYSTAL BALL's up in SPELLing. LZzzz' surname has only  1 'm' as in her namesake STELLA R . . . . .ton', former S . . CHIEF and author. Hmm Hmm Hmm. Very fine Coaching Stan, did he travel up the A12 by stagec...ch ?

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #131 on: December 05, 2011, 12:31:PM »
Campion wants me to post this:

Offline HMEssex

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1501
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #132 on: December 05, 2011, 09:19:PM »
So one minute she's talking about McDonald being the 'hitman', then next she doesn't believe that and says JB is responsible!

Hartley

  • Guest
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #133 on: December 05, 2011, 09:31:PM »
So one minute she's talking about McDonald being the 'hitman', then next she doesn't believe that and says JB is responsible!

I think there must be a certain amount of poetic licence with a number of these published works, they have to be a good read in order to sell.

On this particular point, Julie didn't ever say it was Mcdonald, she said that Jeremy told her that it was Mcdonald. That's a very distinct and important detail.
« Last Edit: December 05, 2011, 09:40:PM by Hartley »

Offline smiffy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
Re: "I haven't rehearsed what I am going to tell the jury." (JM)
« Reply #134 on: December 06, 2011, 07:26:AM »
So one minute she's talking about McDonald being the 'hitman', then next she doesn't believe that and says JB is responsible!

I think there must be a certain amount of poetic licence with a number of these published works, they have to be a good read in order to sell.

On this particular point, Julie didn't ever say it was Mcdonald, she said that Jeremy told her that it was Mcdonald. That's a very distinct and important detail.


A regular line when someone was telling lies to spin trouble I have come across is "using someone told me" as an excuse"....so anything wrong etc can be offloaded by the spinner of the false story. If the person is named that said the story then often they are the target of the lie.