Julie Mugford was telling the truth. As I've stated elsewhere; it's quite possible the 30 odd sessions referred to, were her receiving support, following her experiences with her run in of an extremely disordered and dangerous man.
Hi Stephanie,
I was interested in your comments which I just picked up on. Basically, whether Mugford lied or not, has no bearing on the possibility, probability, impossibility, or improbability of Jeremy having shot and killed his sister? Of course, you are entitled to your opinion like the rest of us. Having said this, it beggars belief that Cops who investigated these killings deliberately withheld the contents of key police message logs which were recorded spontaneously in real time, information which challenges the very nature of the prosecutions case against Bamber. It didn't stop there, either, they lied and decieved the court which tried the matter about who had taken all the photographs of Sheila Caffells body 'insitu' inside the bedroom. Sheila was reportedly found downstairs in the kitchen at 7.37am, onward and her body was certainly not upstairs anywhere prior to 8.10am. The rifle which fired the fatal shot that killed her was sighted leaning against a first floor window by WPC Julia Jeapes prior to the armed officers making their approach to enter the farmhouse. Now, armed with this information, it must be obvious to even the most bias persons in favour of Bambers guilt that he could not have shot and killed his sister. People can hate or dislike him, or both, as much as they like, but the solid truth of the matter is, that Bamber had no input into the contents of these key police message logs which by 7.37am had his sister downstairs in the kitchen, and by 8.10am she was not upstairs in the main bedroom, otherwise cops would have found four bodies upstairs by that stage not the three bodies which is recorded. People need to look at the bigger picture in this case, not concentrate or focus on the thoughts and ideas that relatives, or Julie Mugford had in their minds. The stark facts in this case all boil down to the circumstances surrounding the death of Bambers sister in the main bedroom by use of the family owned rifle. Was it possible for Bamber to have got possession of that rifle from the bedroom window after 7.15am, and use it to shoot dead his sister on the bedroom floor, then stage her death scene there on the bedroom floor at some point after 8.10am, oh and remove a silencer from the guns barrel and take it to another part of the farmhouse to conceal it, without any of the multitude of police officers present at the scene by 8.10am, both inside and outside the farmhouse? No, he could not possibly have got into the farmhouse after 8.10am, on that first morning of the police investigation, to grab the rifle from a first floor window and shoot his sister dead, and stage his sister's body to fool them into accepting that she had committed suicide? Impossible, since by 8.10am, cops had found five bodies, two bodies in the kitchen by 7.37am, one of these two deaths was known to be a murder, the other death known to be a suicide, by 7.45am. Only three bodies upstairs, all murders. Rifle confirmed as resting against a first floor window from an occasion prior to the firearm officers gaining access to the farmhouse. How did Bamber obtain the rifle from a first floor window after 7.15am, and how did he manage to shoot dead his sister on the main bedroom floor and stage her death scene there with the gun at any stage after 8.10am? You know that he couldn't have, having benefit to all this police evidence that was kept back from the defence and the jury at Bambers trial?
