Author Topic: Question for NGB  (Read 11845 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline bob

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1321
  • 78.6%
Question for NGB
« on: November 09, 2011, 11:22:PM »
Neil,

As far as I can tell, posters on both sides have a good deal of respect for you.
You conduct yourself well, and try to be reasoned in your responses.

Unfortunately, Jackie Preece seems to have hijacked you as her pet.

If I was you I would be a tad embarrassed about that. In particular, I suspect you are a bit embarrassed by a lot of the stuff she posts on "your behalf", but understandably feel unable to comment.

But let's see if we can set that aside for a moment...

I would like to know... assuming you have had access to more evidence than most of us... how certain are you that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?

Thanks,
Bob.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2011, 12:06:AM »
Bob
Ngb is so embarrassed I have his personal phone number where I can ring him any time I want

I haven't rung him yet (although it's none of your business)  because he is busy 24/7 working on Jeremys case



Our Justice system is very important to Ngb that's why he studied for so many years for something he believes in.  He is an extraordinary person and if anyone is embarrassing it's you with your insults to smiffy and constant smiting of everyone

Look at yourself Bob it's not good behaviour

Offline bob

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1321
  • 78.6%
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2011, 12:08:AM »
Bob
Ngb is so embarrassed I have his personal phone number where I can ring him any time I want

I haven't rung him yet (although it's none of your business)  because he is busy 24/7 working on Jeremys case



Our Justice system is very important to Ngb that's why he studied for so many years for something he believes in.  He is an extraordinary person and if anyone is embarrassing it's you with your insults to smiffy and constant smiting of everyone

Look at yourself Bob it's not good behaviour
If it's ok with you Jackie, I think I'll wait for the man to answer for himself.
For a change.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #3 on: November 10, 2011, 12:20:AM »
Don't mention me then Bob you are looking stupider by the minute

Why don't you get back to smiting random people

I do like the way I seem to have riled you guilty lot

Firstly Ngb, then Simon, I bet you can't wait for the next important person to be announced who is helping Jeremy

Offline bob

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1321
  • 78.6%
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2011, 12:24:AM »
I do like the way I seem to have riled you guilty lot
Presumably you mean "I do like the way I can invade a thread, the title of which makes it clear it is aimed at somebody else, yet make it all about me"?

For the avoidance of doubt... I was talking about you - not to you.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2011, 12:25:AM »
Don't mention me then Bob you are looking stupider by the minute

Why don't you get back to smiting random people

I do like the way I seem to have riled you guilty lot

Firstly Ngb, then Simon, I bet you can't wait for the next important person to be announced who is helping Jeremy

"stupider" ............ I think you mean, more stupid?
« Last Edit: November 10, 2011, 12:31:AM by vidvic »
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2011, 07:35:AM »
Neil,

As far as I can tell, posters on both sides have a good deal of respect for you.
You conduct yourself well, and try to be reasoned in your responses.

Unfortunately, Jackie Preece seems to have hijacked you as her pet.

If I was you I would be a tad embarrassed about that. In particular, I suspect you are a bit embarrassed by a lot of the stuff she posts on "your behalf", but understandably feel unable to comment.

But let's see if we can set that aside for a moment...

I would like to know... assuming you have had access to more evidence than most of us... how certain are you that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?

Thanks,
Bob.


I have reported this abusive post/thread to the mods due the outrageous personal attacks it makes on NGB and Jackie and the flagrant breach of forum rules it represents.

Offline smiffy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2011, 07:37:AM »
Neil,

As far as I can tell, posters on both sides have a good deal of respect for you.
You conduct yourself well, and try to be reasoned in your responses.

Unfortunately, Jackie Preece seems to have hijacked you as her pet.

If I was you I would be a tad embarrassed about that. In particular, I suspect you are a bit embarrassed by a lot of the stuff she posts on "your behalf", but understandably feel unable to comment.

But let's see if we can set that aside for a moment...

I would like to know... assuming you have had access to more evidence than most of us... how certain are you that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?

Thanks,
Bob.


I have reported this abusive post/thread to the mods due the outrageous personal attacks it makes on NGB and Jackie and the flagrant breach of forum rules it represents.

well done choch...that is the correct thing to do.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2011, 07:45:AM »
Neil,

As far as I can tell, posters on both sides have a good deal of respect for you.
You conduct yourself well, and try to be reasoned in your responses.

Unfortunately, Jackie Preece seems to have hijacked you as her pet.

If I was you I would be a tad embarrassed about that. In particular, I suspect you are a bit embarrassed by a lot of the stuff she posts on "your behalf", but understandably feel unable to comment.

But let's see if we can set that aside for a moment...

I would like to know... assuming you have had access to more evidence than most of us... how certain are you that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?

Thanks,
Bob.


I have reported this abusive post/thread to the mods due the outrageous personal attacks it makes on NGB and Jackie and the flagrant breach of forum rules it represents.

well done choch...that is the correct thing to do.

 

Thank you, Smiffy.

chochokeira

  • Guest
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2011, 07:51:AM »
Neil,

As far as I can tell, posters on both sides have a good deal of respect for you.
You conduct yourself well, and try to be reasoned in your responses.

Unfortunately, Jackie Preece seems to have hijacked you as her pet.

If I was you I would be a tad embarrassed about that. In particular, I suspect you are a bit embarrassed by a lot of the stuff she posts on "your behalf", but understandably feel unable to comment.

But let's see if we can set that aside for a moment...

I would like to know... assuming you have had access to more evidence than most of us... how certain are you that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?

Thanks,
Bob.


For Bob, the only pet on the forum, to make this appalling attack on NGB is beyond absurd. I do hope you are banned for this, Bob.

Offline DCrump

  • Junior Member
  • **
  • Posts: 49
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #10 on: November 10, 2011, 09:08:AM »
Neil,

As far as I can tell, posters on both sides have a good deal of respect for you.
You conduct yourself well, and try to be reasoned in your responses.

Unfortunately, Jackie Preece seems to have hijacked you as her pet.

If I was you I would be a tad embarrassed about that. In particular, I suspect you are a bit embarrassed by a lot of the stuff she posts on "your behalf", but understandably feel unable to comment.

But let's see if we can set that aside for a moment...

I would like to know... assuming you have had access to more evidence than most of us... how certain are you that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?

Thanks,
Bob.


I have reported this abusive post/thread to the mods due the outrageous personal attacks it makes on NGB and Jackie and the flagrant breach of forum rules it represents.

Oh come on... Jackie has just done exactly what Bob accuses her of in this thread. But if NGB is indeed "working 24/7 on Jeremy's case" he can only toe the JB line can't he? So the question itself is a little unfair. Maybe NGB should consider whether posting on a forum such as this sits well with his other work.

Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #11 on: November 10, 2011, 09:25:AM »
Neil,

As far as I can tell, posters on both sides have a good deal of respect for you.
You conduct yourself well, and try to be reasoned in your responses.

Unfortunately, Jackie Preece seems to have hijacked you as her pet.

If I was you I would be a tad embarrassed about that. In particular, I suspect you are a bit embarrassed by a lot of the stuff she posts on "your behalf", but understandably feel unable to comment.




But let's see if we can set that aside for a moment...

I would like to know... assuming you have had access to more evidence than most of us... how certain are you that Jeremy Bamber is innocent?

Thanks,
Bob.


For Bob, the only pet on the forum, to make this appalling attack on NGB is beyond absurd. I do hope you are banned for this, Bob.


I can not see how this is insulting to NGB.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline smiffy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2000
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #12 on: November 10, 2011, 09:33:AM »
Calling somebody their pet when there is no substance to the claim is insulting in my book and in many other peoples too.




Offline vidvic

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2941
  • R.i 99.9
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #13 on: November 10, 2011, 09:42:AM »
Calling somebody their pet when there is no substance to the claim is insulting in my book and in many other peoples too.

It's insulting to jackie, but not to NGB.
rumor vagatus stulti et acceptantur a Idiotae

Offline grahameb

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 11830
Re: Question for NGB
« Reply #14 on: November 10, 2011, 09:45:AM »
Bob
Ngb is so embarrassed I have his personal phone number where I can ring him any time I want

I haven't rung him yet (although it's none of your business)  because he is busy 24/7 working on Jeremys case



Our Justice system is very important to Ngb that's why he studied for so many years for something he believes in.  He is an extraordinary person and if anyone is embarrassing it's you with your insults to smiffy and constant smiting of everyone

Look at yourself Bob it's not good behaviour
I agree. Bob is casting doubt not only upon Tyler and Jackie's character. But also manipulating the minds of other members (or he would have pm'd ngb instead of posting in open forum?) to doubt the character of ngb. Can I state right now that ngb gives me the impression of being thoroughly professional in his behaviour and completely honest both as a barrister and a person. Bob, please concentrate on legitimate questions instead of taking side swipes at the characters other members.
« Last Edit: November 10, 2011, 09:50:AM by Grahame »