That's not really fair Rochford. I didn't say nothing else matters, the phone logs unfortunately do not determine the matter one way or another, whichever side of the fence you sit on, as they are not conclusive either way. However, they do kinda narrow down the possibilities don't they? The standard telephone technology available now (and not long after the incident in reality) would likely have sorted this one way or the other, and therefore the logs would likely have been compelling evidence at the original trial, as indeed they may in a future appeal depending on the content re the witheld docs/destroyed tapes etc.
Can I ask locals in Essex, is berserk a common term used by Joe public there? I say this, because berserk is commonly used by police offices in communications to convey the gravity of a situation quickly (I am not a police officer). I rarely hear it in day to day speech. Would Neville have likely used this term?
Thanks for posting the info Jackie. I am not convinced that the second log is not just relaying the content of the first call to another, therefore I guess I am saying that at the moment I don't think Neville called the police. I am not sure I can learn any more about the logs at the moment but I will be very interested in the additional info relating to the calls in the appeal (amongst other things of course!).