I stated last month that I am about 70-80% convinced of JB's innocence, although to be fair that is based solely on work covered during my law degree and information I have picked up from this forum and reading other internet material and Scott Lomax's book. I have no inside track on the case. I have nothing but respect for all posters, most of whom know a lot more about the case than me. However, as someone who at present believes JB is innocent, I am just disappointed that in the recent threads, posts by anti JB people, such as Hartley, Vidvic and Shonapugs come across as far more articulate and believeable than those from the pro JB supporters. This is not a criticism, but looking in from the outside I hoped to read strong points from JB posters, expressing clear points which would further convince me that JB is innocent. Sadly at present this does not appear to be the case, although I still believe JB is innocent, perhaps not as strongly as I originally did.
petey, the problem with Jeremy's conviction, is that it is based on a jilted girlfriends word.
A girlfriend, who, if she had gone to the Police prior to the killings, could perhaps have prevented this tragedy.
A girlfriend who carried on her relationship with Jeremy for weeks after the murders, until he ended
the relationship.
It is the total lack of forensic evedence linking Jeremy to the crimes.
Also the thorough destruction of almost all remaining evidence, by the Police, even though they had been expressly told to preserve it as D.N.A research had become available.
I don't know if Jeremy is guilty or innocent, but I do see that any chance of proving his innocence
has been destroyed by Essex Police.
This makes alarm bells ring for me - someone is covering up something - it makes me despair for
any of us ever knowing the truth behind the murders at White Hous Farm.
