Reason, known to ngb1066, why Wakefield HMP has banned Jeremy from the press

[BarefootDanC]

Reason, known to ngb1066, why Wakefield HMP has banned Jeremy from the press

Apparently the Campaign Team know another reason why Jeremy cannot speak to the press. Our source, ngb1066, say he knows what the reason is, but he is sworn to secrecy as usual.

Whilst I respect ngb1066's professionalism in keeping information confidential where he has been asked to, it makes me suspicious of the Campaign Team. Why are they so secretive with information which supposedly show "the establishment" in poor light and Jeremy in good light?

For example, only people like ngb1066 are allowed to see the Provisional Statement of Reasons or the full Statement of Reasons from the 2012.

[Steve_uk]

Reason, known to ngb1066, why Wakefield HMP has banned Jeremy from the press

Apparently the Campaign Team know another reason why Jeremy cannot speak to the press. Our source, ngb1066, say he knows what the reason is, but he is sworn to secrecy as usual.

Whilst I respect ngb1066's professionalism in keeping information confidential where he has been asked to, it makes me suspicious of the Campaign Team. Why are they so secretive with information which supposedly show "the establishment" in poor light and Jeremy in good light?

For example, only people like ngb1066 are allowed to see the Provisional Statement of Reasons or the full Statement of Reasons from the 2012.

If the site doesn't stay relevant we will be down to the common core of 62 visitors daily ,down from 44,000 at its peak.

[Adam]

Jeremy will have the same rights as every other prisoner regarding speaking to the press.

But claiming he is being singled out ironically keeps him in the press.

[Jonathan]

The narrative of a miscarriage or illegal  silencing would fall apart if the reasons were not kept quiet.

[Cambridgecutie]

If the site doesn't stay relevant we will be down to the common core of 62 visitors daily ,down from 44,000 at its peak.

Have you considered this figure might include our robotic friends?  Do you really believe that 44,000 humans are reading your posts?

[ngb1066]

If the site doesn't stay relevant we will be down to the common core of 62 visitors daily ,down from 44,000 at its peak.

The 44,000 visitors were mainly bots.

[David1819]

The 44,000 visitors were mainly bots.

Over 300,000 web scraping bots have been blocked this month alone.

[David1819]

Did Steve actually think he had tens of thousands of real people reading his unhinged fiction at any one time? 

[snow66!]

Did Steve actually think he had tens of thousands of real people reading his unhinged fiction at any one time? 

Ha ha! I was taken in by the numbers too, Dave, before you explained to me about bots!

[Steve_uk]

Did Steve actually think he had tens of thousands of real people reading his unhinged fiction at any one time? 

I thought it was you who was behind the sabotage of this site, tinkering with it at your whim, blunderbuss that you undoubtedly are.

[ngb1066]

I thought it was you who was behind the sabotage of this site, tinkering with it at your whim, blunderbuss that you undoubtedly are.

You appear unhinged Steve. David has given help and advice in dealing with serious problems affecting this forum.  He certainly was not responsible for the problems.  I have to give credit where it is due, even where it is difficult for me because his political views align with yours rather than mine.

[Steve_uk]

You appear unhinged Steve. David has given help and advice in dealing with serious problems affecting this forum.  He certainly was not responsible for the problems.  I have to give credit where it is due, even where it is difficult for me because his political views align with yours rather than mine.

I don't care to be labelled unhinged, whether it comes from you, David1819 or any other quarter. I have my own perception of you, which I wouldn't divulge publicly. A redeeming feature may be you working pro bono on legal cases, just as I have been involved in charity work through the Church. Cambridgecutie has summed up David1819, which I won't repeat here, but which I estimate contains more than a grain of truth therein.

[snow66!]

Gee whizz guys! You're getting heavy!

[Steve_uk]

Gee whizz guys! You're getting heavy!

I think we should get back to the main issue of the thread: why information is being withheld from members of this site.

[snow66!]

I think we should get back to the main issue of the thread: why information is being withheld from members of this site.

I imagine any info being withheld is for confidential reasons, Steve!
Maybe anyone connected to JB is advised by his legal team what to disclose[or not] for his best interests?
Loose lips sink ships, and all that!