Allegedly biased summing up by the judge

[Adam]

Seems the defence scenario is -

Sheila collected the rifle while everyone slept.

Fired 9 shots at June & Nevill in the main bedroom.

Nevill got downstairs and started ringing Bamber.

Bamber answered and Nevill said 11 words before the phone went dead. Which suggests Sheila had arrived in the kitchen.

There was then the kitchen attack. The injuries and kitchen crime scene well documentated.

[ILB]

There is no defence scenario at trial in 1986.

Jeremy doesnt to this day put across what he thinks happened. He says he hasnt a clue.

Rivlins sole job was to raise doubt to the crowns case.

Scenarios are good forum fodder for the likes of myself and you.

[ILB]

In fairness Rivlin did bring up ritualistic cleansing to combat the absence of evidence on Shelia.

[Adam]

Must remember Adams advice.

If I am ever confronted by a knife welding group of teenagers, I will use my height and weight advantage to " just take the knife"

Leaving my children fatherless in the process.

I would not recommend taking on one teenager holding a knife. Let alone a group.

[Adam]

There is no defence scenario at trial in 1986.

Jeremy doesnt to this day put across what he thinks happened. He says he hasnt a clue.

Rivlins sole job was to raise doubt to the crowns case.

Scenarios are good forum fodder for the likes of myself and you.

The defence had to have a scenario for trial. It had to match the crime scene.

The only way to explain the 9 bedroom shots, 2 of which were inches from Nevill's face, is Sheila opened fire on a sleeping June & Nevill.

[Adam]

The prosecution agree with the defence scenario of Sheila opening fire on a sleeping June & Nevill.

They have Bamber doing the same thing!

However they say Nevill would be too injured to speak to Bamber and there was no blood on the phone.

[David1819]

Nevil was shot as he came up the stairs. The shell casings deflected off the bedroom door and the shooter stood in the doorway.