Clearly he is, otherwise you wouldn't be fighting his case.
But JB case aside.. any innocent person that is turned down by the CCRC, prevented from accessing evidence by the CPS, police or courts, is a failure for the justice system, regardless of developments in DNA testing.
You seem to think it makes more sense to spend millions on incarcerating someone, until DNA eventually proves them innocent.
Whereas people with common sense want the innocence found earlier - by proper investigation, the use of powers, and a very searching attitude towards the prosecution agencies involved in the conviction. We don't want someone aged 99 getting acquitted through DNA after spending 50 years in prison.
I think the CCRC have somewhere in the region of 1600 cases to study each year, with a staff of 113 and only 50 case reviewers, imagine getting the number of grounds that Bamber put forward on each case and the level and depth of investigation required to each ground,
The work alone needed to do an in depth investigation for the Boyce AGA theory Roch would take ages, and prove nothing and that’s is just Bamber’s case, each applicant would expect the same in depth approach.
I honestly don’t know the answer Roch, but money and time is a very big problem in my opinion.
