Adam's Claims...

[Cambridgecutie]

Also how is detective special brew getting round the fact its was those with a substantial monetary incentive who first got their hands on and reported the blood and paint? Not Stan Jones? 

For years you harassed and stalked Caroline and Jane.  You are adamant AE and JM are ultimately responsible.  Now you have become the forum bore with your absurd claims about me.  Why? Because you're an incel:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/predicting-harm-among-incels-involuntary-celibates/predicting-harm-among-incels-involuntary-celibates-the-roles-of-mental-health-ideological-belief-and-social-networking-accessible

[ILB]

Did you know DS Jones intimately?  I assume not and if I am right you have no idea what motivated him.  Stop pretending otherwise. 

It is you who has led a sheltered life thinking everyone thinks like you do.  They don't.

Consider the people that rigged the VW emissions testing.  What motivated them?  It wasn't money. 

Consider the 9/11 bombers.  What motivated them?  It wasn't money.

Consider kids who encourage other kids to take their own lives online.  What motivated them?  It wasn't money.

People do all sorts of shite for all sorts of reasons.  The fact you can only see £££'s does not make it so for others.

I would reckon that only financial motive would make something fanciful seem remotely feasible in this instance. And I reckon I'm not in a club of one.

Do you believe Jones would undertake such an endeavour on a mere hunch?

[Adam]

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,12564.msg581497.html#msg581497

Sorry reply 2 only had 31 pieces.

Here is the full 40. Would relate to SJ as well.

[Adam]

Seems CC is saying SJ just fabricated the outside of the silencer.

So who created the back spatter effect inside?

[ILB]

No wonder Jeremy wanted the forum shut down.

[Cambridgecutie]

I would reckon that only financial motive would make something fanciful seem remotely feasible in this instance. And I reckon I'm not in a club of one.

Do you believe Jones would undertake such an endeavour on a mere hunch?

We know you have £££'s in your eyes but not everyone thinks like you!

You perceiving something as "fanciful" and "remotely feasible" doesn't make it so.  To an experienced officer like DS Jones it was par for the course.

In reality it worked a treat. 

[ILB]

We know you have £££'s in your eyes but not everyone thinks like you!

You perceiving something as "fanciful" and "remotely feasible" doesn't make it so.  To an experienced officer like DS Jones it was par for the course.

In reality it worked a treat.

What worked a treat?

[Cambridgecutie]

No wonder Jeremy wanted the forum shut down.

Why would you care if you think him guilty?  And if you don't think him guilty what's your explanation as to how the OUTSIDE of the silencer became contaminated: blood, paint, hair and scratches? 

I don't buy the BS you're on the fence.  You have been a member here since 16th July 2015 at 10.23.  You've spent a total of 75 days, 16 hours and 1 minute as of 14.40 today.  You've made 11,578 posts. 

[ILB]

Why would you care if you think him guilty?  And if you don't think him guilty what's your explanation as to how the OUTSIDE of the silencer became contaminated: blood, paint, hair and scratches? 

I don't buy the BS you're on the fence.  You have been a member here since 16th July 2015 at 10.23.  You've spent a total of 75 days, 16 hours and 1 minute as of 14.40 today.  You've made 11,578 posts.

I don't care what you buy or don't buy about me.

Don't change the subject, answer the question what would make DS Jones do what you said he undertook without financial incentive?

[Roch]

I see members have taken my request really seriously.

[ILB]

I see members have taken my request really seriously.

No malice on my part, it is CC who turns it personal.

[ngb1066]

I see members have taken my request really seriously.

I agree Roch the personal attacks create a poor atmosphere on the forum.  I have edited a few but it is difficult when offensive posts are in response to an offensive post.  I just hope we can avoid having to moderate aggressively.

[Steve_uk]

Adam claims that it was impossible for DS Jones to fabricate the OUTSIDE of the silencer between 9th Aug and 13th Aug because he required too much knowledge that was unavailable.  Such as?

Adam also claims that DS Jones would not do such a thing at that time based on a 'hunch'. DS Jones makes it clear in the Sky docu that he suspected JB from the off.  The pathologist also confirmed DS Jones was the only dissenter on 9th Aug. 

The OUTSIDE of the silencer would not be enough to get the case to court let alone a conviction.  DS Jones had to seize the moment and in doing so he created a back up like an insurance policy and was able at a later date to get the ball rolling with JM and the INSIDE of the silencer.

The lower ranks suspected Bamber at an early stage too: "We're not happy with this chap.."

[Steve_uk]

Did you know DS Jones intimately?  I assume not and if I am right you have no idea what motivated him.  Stop pretending otherwise. 

It is you who has led a sheltered life thinking everyone thinks like you do.  They don't.

Consider the people that rigged the VW emissions testing.  What motivated them?  It wasn't money. 

Consider the 9/11 bombers.  What motivated them?  It wasn't money.

Consider kids who encourage other kids to take their own lives online.  What motivated them?  It wasn't money.

People do all sorts of shite for all sorts of reasons.  The fact you can only see £££'s does not make it so for others.

Of course it was money. They wanted market share and to beat their competitors. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34324772

[ILB]

The lower ranks suspected Bamber at an early stage too: "We're not happy with this chap.."

If I recall correctly the exact phrase was " were not happy with this bloke, this ain't a bloke grieving, this guy is an oddball, not what he seems "