Adam's Claims...

[Steve_uk]

If I recall correctly the exact phrase was " were not happy with this bloke, this ain't a bloke grieving, this guy is an oddball, not what he seems "

Yes, thank you.

[BarefootDanC]

I agree Roch the personal attacks create a poor atmosphere on the forum.  I have edited a few but it is difficult when offensive posts are in response to an offensive post.  I just hope we can avoid having to moderate aggressively.

I think at times this forum becomes like some of the Facebook groups which is a shame.

[ngb1066]

I think at times this forum becomes like some of the Facebook groups which is a shame.

We really try to avoid that.  From what I have seen the Facebook groups are very nasty.

[Cambridgecutie]

No malice on my part, it is CC who turns it personal.

No it is not.  David started it with silly claims about my drinking habits aided and abetted by you and softy boy.  Three boys against one girl and then you have the damn cheek to call me a bully    I am sending for reinforcements. 

[BarefootDanC]

We really try to avoid that.  From what I have seen the Facebook groups are very nasty.

George Barwood's group is - and I have to ask myself why he tolerates it. I believe it's part of a conspiracy to shut guilters up.

Stephan's group is very well moderated and the vast majority of the time, discussion is respectful.

[Cambridgecutie]

George Barwood's group is - and I have to ask myself why he tolerates it. I believe it's part of a conspiracy to shut guilters up.

Stephan's group is very well moderated and the vast majority of the time, discussion is respectful.

On the Red forum we had zero tolerance.  Its the only way, otherwise its tit for tat and just escalates. 

[Cambridgecutie]

DS Jones would only entertain such a feat with a monetary incentive.

What do you think motivated officers in other cases to fabricate evidence where there was clearly no financial incentive eg Guildfor Four and Maguire Seven?

[Cambridgecutie]

I don't care what you buy or don't buy about me.

Don't change the subject, answer the question what would make DS Jones do what you said he undertook without financial incentive?

Why don't you post your theories about the silencer instead of sitting on the sidelines and posting nonsense like DS Jones would only fabricate the silencer if he was incentivised financially.  There are numerous cases where the police fit up suspects without financial incentive.

[ILB]

Why don't you post your theories about the silencer instead of sitting on the sidelines and posting nonsense like DS Jones would only fabricate the silencer if he was incentivised financially.  There are numerous cases where the police fit up suspects without financial incentive.

It's not nonsense, you are accusing a police officer of serious corruption without a scintilla of evidence.

[ILB]

Why don't you post your theories about the silencer instead of sitting on the sidelines and posting nonsense like DS Jones would only fabricate the silencer if he was incentivised financially.  There are numerous cases where the police fit up suspects without financial incentive.

Sitting on the sidelines? I haven't seen JB in  30 years, I'm not a part of his CT, we have no relationship. I just am a man on a forum who has an interest in the case.

I have my own theories about the silencer.

[Adam]

Sitting on the sidelines? I haven't seen JB in  30 years, I'm not a part of his CT, we have no relationship. I just am a man on a forum who has an interest in the case.

I have my own theories about the silencer.

Please divulge.

Either Bamber used the silencer.

Or EP lead by Taff worked in unison to fabricate it. Then asked the relatives to say they found it.

[Hardy Boy]

On the Red forum we had zero tolerance.  Its the only way, otherwise its tit for tat and just escalates.

Ha Ha not surprising when you was playing most of the characters, you didn’t care for zero tolerance when you dedicated a topic to attack members on the blue forum. 

[Cambridgecutie]

Ha Ha not surprising when you was playing most of the characters, you didn’t care for zero tolerance when you dedicated a topic to attack members on the blue forum.

Ha Ha you are either utterly deluded or a liar.  I only ever had one profile on the 'Red' forum. 

"attack"?  It must have escaped your attention that the Blue forum is an online forum not Pear Harbour!  And of course members of the Blue forum are all 'innocence and light' and never deserving of condemnation 

And if you felt that strongly then why not cancel your membership in protest?

[Hardy Boy]

Ha Ha you are either utterly deluded or a liar.  I only ever had one profile on the 'Red' forum. 

"attack"?  It must have escaped your attention that the Blue forum is an online forum not Pear Harbour!  And of course members of the Blue forum are all 'innocence and light' and never deserving of condemnation 

And if you felt that strongly then why not cancel your membership in protest?

Well in your opening post you ask members to check your Colsville posts on Red, meaning your KE/Cutie here and Holly/Colsville on Red.

I can’t cancel my account, as a Moderator on Red you will see I’ve not been on for years, I can’t remember my password.

From CC/KE who we know as Holly from Red……. On the red forum I have been posting as Colsville, if you want to have a look at what I've written.

[Cambridgecutie]

Well in your opening post you ask members to check your Colsville posts on Red, meaning your KE/Cutie here and Holly/Colsville on Red.

I can’t cancel my account, as a Moderator on Red you will see I’ve not been on for years, I can’t remember my password.

From CC/KE who we know as Holly from Red……. On the red forum I have been posting as Colsville, if you want to have a look at what I've written.

Stop attemtping to make trouble and divert attention away from the case.

I have only ever had one forum profile on the 'Red' forum. 

It is not against forum rules to have different profiles.  It is against forum rules to use profiles simultaneously which I have never done.