Tell me you are conspiract theorist without telling me you are a consp. theorist

[Roch]

When?  No one has posted regularly on the Red forum/Bamber board for years.  Oh you mean about a decade ago?

I will remind you of some of the comments made here about the victims of WHF:

NB fathered the twins - MT - removed

SC was promiscious - Lookout - remained

Not a shred of evidence for either.

I ended up on that forum because I was banned here due to coining a phrase from Red which was used to describe a bunch of regular female members here: 'knitting circle'    I found it amusing and still do.  It might have even included me.  That is banter by most people's standards not abuse. 

Anyway when I found myself on Red, posting as a 'supporter', I didn't experience any issues you have described above. 

You are sounding like a massive girls blouse.

The reason you didn't experience any issues is because you were a prize for them. You lent them some credibility. How many members on your side of the case were able to post over there? I think you'll find that if any did, they would not have been handled with kid gloves like you were.

[Cambridgecutie]

The reason you didn't experience any issues is because you were a prize for them. You lent them some credibility. How many members on your side of the case were able to post over there? I think you'll find that if any did, they would not have been handled with kid gloves like you were.

Ballcocks.  I didn't experience any issues because I stuck to the facts of the case, worked hard, carried out decent analysis and research and they could not undermine my posts 

[Cambridgecutie]

The reason you didn't experience any issues is because you were a prize for them. You lent them some credibility. How many members on your side of the case were able to post over there? I think you'll find that if any did, they would not have been handled with kid gloves like you were.

I would like to have seen the CT on there with the likes of John, Tim, Puglove and Scipio.

[Hardy Boy]

Ballcocks.  I didn't experience any issues because I stuck to the facts of the case, worked hard, carried out decent analysis and research and they could not undermine my posts 

What like, Stan climbed through the window and planted his own blood on the silencer, or Stan wanted to play God, or Stan took a Bung, or Stan stole money out the wallet, you talk out of your backside!

[Roch]

Perhaps CC has red tinted glasses on?

[Cambridgecutie]

What like, Stan climbed through the window and planted his own blood on the silencer, or Stan wanted to play God, or Stan took a Bung, or Stan stole money out the wallet, you talk out of your backside!

Prove me wrong Softy Smelly Boy.

[Cambridgecutie]

Perhaps CC has red tinted glasses on?

No, unlike you, I am capable of seeing both sides and being objective.

[Hardy Boy]

Perhaps CC has red tinted glasses on?

We call it Rose tinted glasses Roch, no one can take her serious anymore, she used two accounts where she could give views Poles apart.