Author Topic: Hearing New Evidence  (Read 7271 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13157
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #225 on: March 18, 2025, 09:02:AM »
Yes there's no evidence as to what he was doing after the phone call to JM made at circa 9.50pm but your absurd theory is that he never left WHF.   

If he never left WHF how come EP overtook him en route?

I never said or suggested he didn't leave WHF after killing everyone. As I said he called police from his cottage at 3.26am

I said staying the night at WHF had lots of advantages to him.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #226 on: March 18, 2025, 09:04:AM »
Mountain of evidence?

There is the word of JB himself. And the mysterious guy who supposably saw his car parked outside his house never gave a statement to the effect. He also had just claimed to have left a public house so may have been three sheets to the wind. ( pissed)

There is a phonecall at 3.26am on August 7th from his house. Prior to leaving WHF if that's what he did according to DF then there is no tangible evidence to suggest exactly where JB was between 10pm and 3.26am This is pre electronic evidence and cell site era. The only person who says they were at home was JB himself.

The theory which is what many of us have such as your brainwashing of mugford can't be conclusively broken down. So it remains open.

Your theory that JM was a woman scorned is as ridiculous as your theory that JB stayed over at WHF. 
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13157
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #227 on: March 18, 2025, 09:06:AM »
Your theory that JM was a woman scorned is as ridiculous as your theory that JB stayed over at WHF.

Hell hath no fury has existed from the beginning of time.

You know this.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #228 on: March 18, 2025, 09:07:AM »
I never said or suggested he didn't leave WHF after killing everyone. As I said he called police from his cottage at 3.26am

I said staying the night at WHF had lots of advantages to him.

It would have been too high risk.  Had he stayed over, which he clearly didn't, how would he know others would not be alerted to this fact eg the Foakes and/or others who telephoned?  Now that would have been incriminating  ::)

Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #229 on: March 18, 2025, 09:11:AM »
Hell hath no fury has existed from the beginning of time.

You know this.

But there's no evidence of any fury.  Post break-up JB helped her move.  He then dropped JM and LR off in the West End for a night out on the town.  She was a young student who was clearly focused on her studies/career hence her current position within the ed system in Canada.  Had she wanted to snare JB she could have stopped taking the pill to force his hand; a tactic which has existed from the beginning of time.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13157
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #230 on: March 18, 2025, 09:14:AM »
It would have been too high risk.  Had he stayed over, which he clearly didn't, how would he know others would not be alerted to this fact eg the Foakes and/or others who telephoned?  Now that would have been incriminating  ::)

Why would the others know about JB staying over?

If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13157
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #231 on: March 18, 2025, 09:15:AM »
But there's no evidence of any fury.  Post break-up JB helped her move.  He then dropped JM and LR off in the West End for a night out on the town.  She was a young student who was clearly focused on her studies/career hence her current position within the ed system in Canada.  Had she wanted to snare JB she could have stopped taking the pill to force his hand; a tactic which has existed from the beginning of time.

No evidence of any fury?

Going ape shit whilst JB was on the phone to another woman?
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #232 on: March 18, 2025, 09:18:AM »
No evidence of any fury?

Going ape shit whilst JB was on the phone to another woman?

It was probably the time of the month!  Stop trying to pretend you can understand women.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Cambridgecutie

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6595
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #233 on: March 18, 2025, 09:20:AM »
Why would the others know about JB staying over?

Where was he going to leave his car?

Others phoned WHF and those within WHF made phone calls.  If JB decided to stay over it would be outside the norm and might have been referenced to.
Patrick O'Connor, Barrister, Doughty Street Chambers: "It will have to be a slam dunk.  It will have to be something of a blockbuster piece of evidence to have a chance".

All goals from Lionesses Euro 2025:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DQq5gnwGjs

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44408
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #234 on: March 18, 2025, 10:40:AM »
Why should he pay it?

Let her fork out for it

You and Bamber really are alike 
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13157
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #235 on: March 18, 2025, 10:51:AM »
You and Bamber really are alike

Why should he pay for it?

If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44408
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #236 on: March 18, 2025, 10:03:PM »
Why should he pay for it?

Because he is too busy to give her a lift. After she travelled up to see him.

But cycle 3 miles while carrying a suitcase it is. According to the CT.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13157
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #237 on: March 18, 2025, 10:23:PM »
Because he is too busy to give her a lift. After she travelled up to see him.

But cycle 3 miles while carrying a suitcase it is. According to the CT.

Cars don't run on fresh air Adam. Typical none driver mentality!

I'm sure Julie didn't slip Bamber petrol money when he was staying overnight with her in London.

« Last Edit: March 18, 2025, 10:23:PM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me