Author Topic: Hearing New Evidence  (Read 7309 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #75 on: March 14, 2025, 10:30:PM »
DF said she heard a " car speed off "

Perhaps he came back?
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #76 on: March 14, 2025, 10:31:PM »
You know deep down he drove if he did this.

We all do.

You mean drove and walked.

The prosecution did the right thing checking with 500 people. They could then say he cycled The Sea Wall.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5955
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #77 on: March 14, 2025, 10:32:PM »
I assume he wanted to contain the siutation in-house and wanted JB as back up.
May I ask your scenario up until that point Cutie?
Did Nevill find Sheila in the kitchen with the loaded rifle and try and talk her down before she ran off upstairs?

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #78 on: March 14, 2025, 10:35:PM »
You mean drove and walked.

The prosecution did the right thing checking with 500 people. They could then say he cycled The Sea Wall.

Parked on Pages Lane, sauntered down

Saunter back, jump in the motor


Back to bourtree.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #79 on: March 14, 2025, 10:39:PM »
Parked on Pages Lane, sauntered down

Saunter back, jump in the motor


Back to bourtree.

Saunter.

Is that what you did before getting a 10+ sentance?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #80 on: March 14, 2025, 10:42:PM »
Parked on Pages Lane, sauntered down

Saunter back, jump in the motor


Back to bourtree.
His car was still outside Bourtree Cottage around midnight according to a local man passing from the Chequers pub. That would narrow down the time frame available to him.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #81 on: March 14, 2025, 10:47:PM »
Saunter.

Is that what you did before getting a 10+ sentance?

No, I had spent almost six months on remand prior.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #82 on: March 14, 2025, 10:49:PM »
His car was still outside Bourtree Cottage around midnight according to a local man passing from the Chequers pub. That would narrow down the time frame available to him.

Doesn't mean much. Plenty of time to do everything prior to giving Julie an update at 3am.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13160
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #83 on: March 14, 2025, 10:54:PM »
Doesn't mean much. Plenty of time to do everything prior to giving Julie an update at 3am.

Was good of Stan to remind Sue of the phonecall
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Online Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4829
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #84 on: March 15, 2025, 03:25:PM »
You know deep down he drove if he did this.

We all do.

Actually I don't ILB, in those days few people had double glazing plus it was a warm time of the year fan lights open etc. yet no one heard a car.

To drive would be total madness but good we all have different views on the case.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #85 on: March 15, 2025, 03:30:PM »
Actually I don't ILB, in those days few people had double glazing plus it was a warm time of the year fan lights open etc. yet no one heard a car.

To drive would be total madness but good we all have different views on the case.

Agree driving to Pages Lane & then walking would be madness.

Walking would take too long and be too tiring. Wilkinson said it was not possible to walk cross country in a straight line.

The bike Bamber stole 2 days earlier was used.
« Last Edit: March 15, 2025, 03:33:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #86 on: March 15, 2025, 03:37:PM »
There is still dispute over what route he cycled.

The police say The Sea Wall route.  CAL says the Brook House Lane route.

I would have exited out of the GH back garden & cycled the Sea Wall route. To avoid properties.

Worth making the extra effort for the huge rewards.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4829
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #87 on: March 15, 2025, 03:52:PM »
There is still dispute over what route he cycled.

The police say The Sea Wall route.  CAL says the Brook House Lane route.

I would have exited out of the GH back garden & cycled the Sea Wall route. To avoid properties.

Worth making the extra effort for the huge rewards.

A fair bit of this route would involve carrying the bike, and you still have not shown me a route which avoids the farms and yapping dogs.

I set a few off the other day.

I think he had to walk virtually 100% safe and not that much slower.

« Last Edit: March 15, 2025, 03:53:PM by Rob_ »

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #88 on: March 15, 2025, 03:58:PM »
A fair bit of this route would involve carrying the bike, and you still have not shown me a route which avoids the farms and yapping dogs.

I set a few off the other day.

I think he had to walk virtually 100% safe and not that much slower.

Walking The Sea Wall route would take 70 minutes. According to Wilkinson. So too long & tiring.

The Sea Wall route is footpaths and farm tracks. There is even a park bench. So he would not have to carry his bike.

It passes no properties.

'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Online Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4829
Re: Hearing New Evidence
« Reply #89 on: March 15, 2025, 04:22:PM »
Walking The Sea Wall route would take 70 minutes. According to Wilkinson. So too long & tiring.

The Sea Wall route is footpaths and farm tracks. There is even a park bench. So he would not have to carry his bike.

It passes no properties.

If walking you would not go via the sea wall, in any case I would say it would be less than 70 minutes.

A young guy could walk around 4mph.