You misread my point.
By the powers that be will never admit I was talking about him getting a succsefull COA aquittal. Much like 2002, one ground unless bombshell won't be enough to quash the conviction is other evidence at trial remains unchallenged which led to a route to which Mugford did .I reference Victor Temple QC 2002.
Looking beyond, but a successful ccrc referral is not his biggest problem.
JB needs to submit evidence that meet the criteria set out by the CPS:
The Court of Appeal may hear new evidence that was not adduced in the original proceedings (section 23(1)(c) Criminal Appeal Act 1968), if:
it appears capable of belief;
it may afford any ground for allowing the appeal;
it would have been admissible;
it is an issue which is the subject of the appeal;
there is a reasonable explanation for the failure to adduce it.
He submits material that goes no way to meeting the above criteria hence its rejected.
