Julie ruining Jeremy's life.

[ILB]

How would she know money was there? Nevill usually took it home.

How would she benefit? Apart from the meal they went on.

Accept Jeremy initiated it from his knowledge as a director of the camp of course.

Strongly believe Julie played a part and enjoyed the spoils. Don't believe he spanked £900 on a meal. Julie had a cut

[ILB]

Yes I doubt he tried as hard to keep her on the 27th as he did on the 17th.

Was probably worried if gulity Julie talking to every tom dick and harry. Although if  we are to believe he was constantly pissed up on jolly ups I'd doubt he had the wherewithal to keep constant check. Especially if taking valium and cannabis as well.

Once Julie realised he wasn't willing to carry on with her and wanted her gone her attitude changed.

[Adam]

Accept Jeremy initiated it from his knowledge as a director of the camp of course.

Strongly believe Julie played a part and enjoyed the spoils. Don't believe he spanked £900 on a meal. Julie had a cut

Do you agree with the judge - if he trusted her enough to speak about the caravan break in, he would trust her enough to speak about the massacre.

[ILB]

Do you agree with the judge - if he trusted her enough to speak about the caravan break in, he would trust her enough to speak about the massacre.

There is only two scenarios regarding Julie for me in this affair.

She lied and put Jeremy Bamber in jail for life and he is an innocent man completely. Due to him leaving her.

She came forward and grassed Bamber and was involved herself and only did so because Bamber did not a relationship with her and she wouldn't benefit financially

To me it's that simple

[Adam]

Was probably worried if gulity Julie talking to every tom dick and harry. Although if  we are to believe he was constantly pissed up on jolly ups I'd doubt he had the wherewithal to keep constant check. Especially if taking valium and cannabis as well.

Once Julie realised he wasn't willing to carry on with her and wanted her gone her attitude changed.

Believe he would have felt safer 10 days later. His bond with Brett getting stronger.

[Adam]

There is only two scenarios regarding Julie for me in this affair.

She lied and put Jeremy Bamber in jail for life and he is an innocent man completely. Due to him leaving her.

She came forward and grassed Bamber and was involved herself and only did so because Bamber did not a relationship with her and she wouldn't benefit financially

To me it's that simple

She left him to return to London.

She was involved. It is in her WS that she discussed it with him.

[ILB]

She left him to return to London.

She was involved. It is in her WS that she discussed it with him.

Many a guilter believe Julie to be an innocent bystander.

If she is involved and he's gulity she's in a pretty safe position as he won't ever grass her as it would knacker his freedom fight.

[Adam]

Many a guilter believe Julie to be an innocent bystander.

If she is involved and he's gulity she's in a pretty safe position as he won't ever grass her as it would knacker his freedom fight.

She discussed it with him. Before & afterwards.

She gave him advice & let her use her sleeping pills. She also didn't approach the police for a month.

The only way she could be more involved is if she stayed at Goldhanger and gave him an alibi.

[Zoso]

I have heard many people comment that Jeremy often avoids making any comment upon Julie.

Does this point to a conspiracy?

He didn't mention her at all to me.

[Cambridgecutie]

Do you agree with the judge - if he trusted her enough to speak about the caravan break in, he would trust her enough to speak about the massacre.

Where does the judge say that?

[ngb1066]

He didn't mention her at all to me.

He has to me, several times.

[ILB]

In fairness there would be no point in him writing to her on a constant basis as the letters would be stopped by prison authorities.

Any third party attempt of communication would be deemed harassment.

[Adam]

Where does the judge say that?

Wilkes. Judges summing up.

He has a point.

[Adam]

Where does the judge say that?

Do you agree with the judge?

[ILB]

Wilkes. Judges summing up.

He has a point.

Big leap between a £900 robbery and x5 murder including two children