Police Fitting Up Suspects

[Cambridgecutie]

How would you describe your own slant?  Not twisted I hope.

Certainly not!

I'll tell you one thing about AE, certainly sticks by her guns.

I have heard she was named after Annie Oakley:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/the-true-story-of-annie-oakley-legendary-sharpshooter

[Hardy Boy]

Certainly not!

I have heard she was named after Annie Oakley:

https://www.nationalgeographic.com/history/article/the-true-story-of-annie-oakley-legendary-sharpshooter

Yes But Cutie, We also have 37 years of Bamber telling lies, manipulating the evidence, creating fiction.  All of it very easy to disprove. An innocent person wouldn't behave like that.

[Cambridgecutie]

Yes But Cutie, We also have 37 years of Bamber telling lies, manipulating the evidence, creating fiction.  All of it very easy to disprove. An innocent person wouldn't behave like that.

I have said on many occasions I am not remotely interested in what Bamber says now, then or anywhere in between. 

I base my beliefs primarily on what the experts say.

[Jane]

AE was present at Bourtree on 7th Aug when JB was giving his statement.  Whatever he said she did not believe.  AE had her own twist/slant.

Or perhaps she heard embellishment and exaggeration.......... or maybe simply a tissue of lies?

[Cambridgecutie]

Or perhaps she heard embellishment and exaggeration.......... or maybe simply a tissue of lies?

Nothing of evidential value just the drip, drip of poison.  Eg the police asked JB if he had a good relationship with his father to which he replied yes.  AE then told the police this was not true.  Whereas we are told by CC in his wit stat that JB had a good relationship with NB which he expanded on by giving examples. 

[Jane]

Nothing of evidential value just the drip, drip of poison.  Eg the police asked JB if he had a good relationship with his father to which he replied yes.  AE then told the police this was not true.  Whereas we are told by CC in his wit stat that JB had a good relationship with NB which he expanded on by giving examples.

So 'others' heard the right words -polite and civil. Such don't necessarily make a "good relationship". I'm guessing CC's knowledge to be based on what JB told him? I very much doubt JB would have told police that his relationship with NB was unsatisfactory.

[Zoso]

You saying I am wrong does not make it right!  There's nothing in A/PS Woodcock's wit stat of 20/09 about thinking the scene didn't look right.  If you want to claim A/PS Woodcock was a dissenter from the murder/suicide theory please provide documentary evidence to this effect. 

And stop trying to stir the pot brining other members into your posts.

But there is something in Bamber's second statement (made on 8th August) that indicated he wanted to make the statement, rather than being asked to do so. However, you 'choose' to ignore that - you're inconsistent. It seems to be one rule for you and one for everyone else as and when it suits you - I guess that's a privilege of being in the A team? 

[Steve_uk]

You saying I am wrong does not make it right!  There's nothing in A/PS Woodcock's wit stat of 20/09 about thinking the scene didn't look right.  If you want to claim A/PS Woodcock was a dissenter from the murder/suicide theory please provide documentary evidence to this effect. 

And stop trying to stir the pot brining other members into your posts.

You would never stir the pot, would you now, Cambridgecutie..

[Zoso]

I have said on many occasions I am not remotely interested in what Bamber says now, then or anywhere in between. 

I base my beliefs primarily on what the experts say.

Maybe you should be concerned with what Bamber says, because for every 'expert' who claims one thing, there will be another who claims the opposite. I guess that's why you try and rubbish the experts who claim guilt.

[ILB]

I am concerned with what Bamber says!

I have an interest in the case.

And Bamber is the main guy in it!

[ILB]

Nothing of evidential value just the drip, drip of poison.  Eg the police asked JB if he had a good relationship with his father to which he replied yes.  AE then told the police this was not true.  Whereas we are told by CC in his wit stat that JB had a good relationship with NB which he expanded on by giving examples.

He did have a good relationship with Nevill. A lot more than either shelia or June. They were close at times and Nevill thought highly of him as well. Inez brown saying " Jeremy was nevills favourite"

Bambers strained relationship with June put Nevill in the uncompromising position between batting between his wife and adopted child. However I never have seen adoption as a major major issue and both children were adopted by Nevill and June from babies.

[ILB]

His happy childhood adolsence antidotes he recalls in his blogs are more than likely true. Problems arising much later

[Zoso]

I am concerned with what Bamber says!

I have an interest in the case.

And Bamber is the main guy in it!

Absolutely! Pretty arrogant to suggest his input isn't important.

[Hardy Boy]

Absolutely! Pretty arrogant to suggest his input isn't important.

Not worth interviewing him then. 

[Hardy Boy]

Yes But Cutie, We also have 37 years of Bamber telling lies, manipulating the evidence, creating fiction.  All of it very easy to disprove. An innocent person wouldn't behave like that.

This quote i put was from Cutie by the way