Author Topic: The New Yorker article  (Read 10623 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline snow66!

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5959
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #150 on: July 30, 2024, 08:45:PM »
This I watched live, forever etched on my memory: https://youtu.be/XLLtS50UCBQ
Ha ha,remember it well Steve,remember it well!
Its often repeated too in various archive shows.
Not quite as funny as Oliver Reed with Michael Aspel though! Remember him singing'the wild one' Steve?
One of the funniest things ever!

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3358
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #151 on: July 30, 2024, 08:55:PM »
The relevant part of Jean Rowe's statement:
.

There are two parts to this statement. In the first sentence she is clearly responding to a/another request to check the line. The second part relates to the same caller asking for the open line to be linked to HQ and she explains how she achieved it. It is possible that a 999 call had been received just prior to the request to link the HQ and WHF lines. JR may not have known what happened between the two requests. The 999 call could have been executed by someone else. It could have been answered by another exchange/operator.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #152 on: July 30, 2024, 09:28:PM »
If one can murder five innocent people for x amount of money, then you can frame one innocent person for the same amount.

In 2001 when the FSS visited the scene, there was still Junes blood visibly on the lampshade by the bed that Ann Eaton now sleeps at. She is probably a sociopath or something of that nature.

Maybe AE had her heart set on the farmhouse from childhood, having probably visited it on many occasions. Before Jeremy Bamber was even born.

Who knows just speculating
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #153 on: July 30, 2024, 09:46:PM »
Maybe AE had her heart set on the farmhouse from childhood, having probably visited it on many occasions. Before Jeremy Bamber was even born.

Who knows just speculating


And why not? I feel certain, as a small child, she probably believed herself to be Aunt June and Uncle Nevill's favourite niece. They had no children so it's very possible that she harboured fantasies about living at WHF when she was a grown up.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #154 on: July 30, 2024, 10:06:PM »

And why not? I feel certain, as a small child, she probably believed herself to be Aunt June and Uncle Nevill's favourite niece. They had no children so it's very possible that she harboured fantasies about living at WHF when she was a grown up.

I don't reckon Nevill was as keen on them, or Jeremy for that matter.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #155 on: July 30, 2024, 10:29:PM »
He didn't deny it. Peter Gruner of the Evening Standard corroborates. (CAL Chapter 37)

He kind of did when he did that newspapers tend to make up a lot of stories about him. He has never admitted it. I asked him and surprise ...... he didn't answer the question.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #156 on: July 30, 2024, 10:33:PM »
He kind of did when he did that newspapers tend to make up a lot of stories about him. He has never admitted it. I asked him and surprise ...... he didn't answer the question.

It appears hes skirted round the issue for want of a better word
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #157 on: July 30, 2024, 10:48:PM »
It appears hes skirted round the issue for want of a better word

That's one of the things he does with difficult questions.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #158 on: July 30, 2024, 11:39:PM »
That's one of the things he does with difficult questions.

He knows it makes him look a twat that's why.

Damages the " innocent " image
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #159 on: July 31, 2024, 01:59:AM »
He knows it makes him look a twat that's why.

Damages the " innocent " image

There should be a few red faces here too, people argued blind that Bamber would never have done that and Fielder was a liar, Colin too. So that's a BIG "I told you so" from me!

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13164
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #160 on: July 31, 2024, 10:31:AM »
There should be a few red faces here too, people argued blind that Bamber would never have done that and Fielder was a liar, Colin too. So that's a BIG "I told you so" from me!

Personally it's just a bad taste of morals. Whether Brett spearheaded it or what, which I believe is likely.

But it wouldn't have gone ahead without Jeremys say so. It was his sister his family. So he has to take blame for it.

Fielder described Jeremy as " this cocky cool man "

Jeremy is saying his head was " all over the place " when he did it. " I was on valium heavy "
« Last Edit: July 31, 2024, 10:33:AM by ILB »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Bubo bubo

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3358
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #161 on: July 31, 2024, 11:27:AM »
.

There are two parts to this statement. In the first sentence she is clearly responding to a/another request to check the line. The second part relates to the same caller asking for the open line to be linked to HQ and she explains how she achieved it. It is possible that a 999 call had been received just prior to the request to link the HQ and WHF lines. JR may not have known what happened between the two requests. The 999 call could have been executed by someone else. It could have been answered by another exchange/operator.

The fact that there were it appears more than two attempts to check the phone line at WHF why did they not ask to be linked sooner? This might suggest that it was only after the receiver was used to close the line and change its status at WHF made this action possible. Then if the line is connected via another call the operator can switch the call to another line like divisional headquarters Chelmsford. A 999 call would be at EP headquarters so they could have monitored the line there but it was switched to the control room where the police were at action stations dealing with the emerging situation.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2024, 11:41:AM by Bubo bubo »

Offline Hardy Boy

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3925
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #162 on: July 31, 2024, 03:35:PM »
There should be a few red faces here too, people argued blind that Bamber would never have done that and Fielder was a liar, Colin too. So that's a BIG "I told you so" from me!
Yes it shows what a lying scheming scum bag he is, he robbed his own family, he tied to sell pictures of his murdered sister in the nude and had the family dog put to sleep, he murdered his own family,  this murderer has no Empathy for anyone and  trying to profit from his dead sister takes the biscuit.  His supporters can put whatever spin they want on it, but he was at that meeting and he would have agreed to the sale if it had gone ahead.

I wonder if his website will update their details to his supporters and tell the truth that Bamber scum bag did try to sell nude photo's of his dead Sister to the Sun newspaper after always lying and saying it never happened?  Any person who would do this has no feelings for anyone,  especially for his family and certainly has no empathy.

« Last Edit: July 31, 2024, 06:22:PM by Hardy Boy »

Offline Zoso

  • Administrator
  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2444
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #163 on: July 31, 2024, 07:06:PM »
Yes it shows what a lying scheming scum bag he is, he robbed his own family, he tied to sell pictures of his murdered sister in the nude and had the family dog put to sleep, he murdered his own family,  this murderer has no Empathy for anyone and  trying to profit from his dead sister takes the biscuit.  His supporters can put whatever spin they want on it, but he was at that meeting and he would have agreed to the sale if it had gone ahead.

I wonder if his website will update their details to his supporters and tell the truth that Bamber scum bag did try to sell nude photo's of his dead Sister to the Sun newspaper after always lying and saying it never happened?  Any person who would do this has no feelings for anyone,  especially for his family and certainly has no empathy.

This is from CAL's book .....

"An affiliate website to Jeremy’s campaign pages today denounces Fielder’s account, insisting that Jeremy met the Sun reporter against his better judgment and that Fielder repeatedly pressed for any nude shots of Sheila which were ‘never obtained’ because ‘they didn’t exist’.15 But Sheila’s friend has spoken at length about helping her prepare for the photo session, and Colin saw the resulting slides for himself, discussing them both in his witness statements and his memoir. He recalls that Jeremy’s description of the photographs to Fielder – ‘They show everything, right down to the last detail’ – was identical to the words Jeremy had used to him."

VINDICATION!

 

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33782
Re: The New Yorker article
« Reply #164 on: July 31, 2024, 07:22:PM »
This is from CAL's book .....

"An affiliate website to Jeremy’s campaign pages today denounces Fielder’s account, insisting that Jeremy met the Sun reporter against his better judgment and that Fielder repeatedly pressed for any nude shots of Sheila which were ‘never obtained’ because ‘they didn’t exist’.15 But Sheila’s friend has spoken at length about helping her prepare for the photo session, and Colin saw the resulting slides for himself, discussing them both in his witness statements and his memoir. He recalls that Jeremy’s description of the photographs to Fielder – ‘They show everything, right down to the last detail’ – was identical to the words Jeremy had used to him."

VINDICATION!



As Nevill Bamber said "The truth will come out in the end".