Emma Morris

[Cambridgecutie]

I've no idea.  I rarely look in on the forum.  But I did read a post of KE's which I intended to respond to but didn't have time to then and there.  When I logged in to respond I read posts about KE and CC being one and the same.  I then realised that some of KE's posts were literally a copy and paste job from CC's!?  I note KE's profile has been deleted? 

Thought admin/mods had access to IP addresses?

Also I note 239 posts are logged under my forum name and yet my forum profile shows 3,223 posts.  The latter sounds about right.  What has happened to about 3,000 posts made under my forum name?

[Jane]

It was QC who first suggest that to me (see attachment). All I did was ask.

Contrary to popular misconception, I don't keep an eye out for anyone. People PM me with their suspicions and if I find it plausible I wont be afraid to ask on the forum. I don't know if other people get on the receiving end of such gossip or not. 

PS. If I was stalking you I would have been able to correct QC then and there and not get it wrong in the first place.

And do you know why they PM you? Because they recognize you for the underhand creep you are. I doubt that anyone else here is asked to delve into posters' characters and backgrounds! More to the point, they probably wouldn't, anyway! Back to ignore!!

[Hardy Boy]

It was QC who first suggest that to me (see attachment). All I did was ask.

Contrary to popular misconception, I don't keep an eye out for anyone. People PM me with their suspicions and if I find it plausible I wont be afraid to ask on the forum. I don't know if other people get on the receiving end of such gossip or not. 

PS. If I was stalking you I would have been able to correct QC then and there and not get it wrong in the first place.

Quote from: David1819 on December 23, 2021, 11:32:AM
So its all a coincidence that

- Munksa signed up for an account two days after Real Justice deleted his.

- Munksa and FJ have the same writing style.

- Munksa started getting rather personal with Jackie despite only posting for less than 24 hours.

- Munksa knew Fake Justice is a nickname for Real Justice

- Munksa did not deny the allegation with a simple yes/no answer and went on a personal rant aimed at myself.





Like i say, your a serial  Stalker with a severe illness as far as i'm concerned

What Munska said....................... No wonder new members don't post/comment. Can't blame them. See I didn't last long 🙂 Oooppsss in their own minds I am Fake/Real Justice so i left.

NGB will back me if you want, you would not take his word

[David1819]

You wouldn't even believe NGB when he told you several times.  Why have you bought this person up when there are 100s of active accounts

No, I simply did not agree with NGB and believed he was mistaken.

When I asked Munksa if it was you, the response Munksa gave included the words FakeJustice and RealJustice in the same paragraph. Someone new to the forum would not have known the connection between the account name and the nickname. Hence I believed it was indeed you.

Anyway, I apologise for that and I'm sure you will take back your comments about me having some obsessive illness. 

Its apparent now that Munksa is CC/KE. Hence I brought it up. 

[Hardy Boy]

Quote from: David1819 on December 23, 2021, 11:32:AM
So its all a coincidence that

- Munksa signed up for an account two days after Real Justice deleted his.

- Munksa and FJ have the same writing style.

- Munksa started getting rather personal with Jackie despite only posting for less than 24 hours.

- Munksa knew Fake Justice is a nickname for Real Justice

- Munksa did not deny the allegation with a simple yes/no answer and went on a personal rant aimed at myself.





Like i say, your a serial  Stalker with a severe illness as far as i'm concerned

What Munska said....................... No wonder new members don't post/comment. Can't blame them. See I didn't last long 🙂 Oooppsss in their own minds I am Fake/Real Justice so i left.

NGB will back me if you want, you would not take his word

this is the GUY who doesn't delve into your posts, He will know when you joined, how long you spend on here and when you go for a shit. 

[Cambridgecutie]

No, I simply did not agree with NGB and believed he was mistaken.

When I asked Munksa if it was you, the response Munksa gave included the words FakeJustice and RealJustice in the same paragraph. Someone new to the forum would not have known the connection between the account name and the nickname. Hence I believed it was indeed you.

Anyway, I apologise for that and I'm sure you will take back your comments about me having some obsessive illness. 

Its apparent now that Munksa is CC/KE. Hence I brought it up.

Wrong as usual.

[Cambridgecutie]

No, I simply did not agree with NGB and believed he was mistaken.

When I asked Munksa if it was you, the response Munksa gave included the words FakeJustice and RealJustice in the same paragraph. Someone new to the forum would not have known the connection between the account name and the nickname. Hence I believed it was indeed you.

Anyway, I apologise for that and I'm sure you will take back your comments about me having some obsessive illness. 

Its apparent now that Munksa is CC/KE. Hence I brought it up.

When you say apparent, you mean apparent to you.  This reminds me of your 'forensic evidence breakthrough' which was only ever apparent to you 

[Jane]

this is the GUY who doesn't delve into your posts, He will know when you joined, how long you spend on here and when you go for a shit.

He claims he doesn't spend hours a day doing so because there is technology available to make such easier. However, he doesn't claim he never did it!

[Hardy Boy]

Wrong as usual.

You did well Cutie, i have just checked and you had three profiles Cutie, KE and now Munska all talking to each other in the thread where he accused me of being Munska  are you sure your not ME or are you everybody?

[David1819]

this is the GUY who doesn't delve into your posts, He will know when you joined, how long you spend on here and when you go for a shit.

Yet here you are delving into my posts.     If I knew what you allege and did what you allege, how on earth did I manage to get it wrong in the first place? 

[Hardy Boy]

Yet here you are delving into my posts.     If I knew what you allege and did what you allege, how on earth did I manage to get it wrong in the first place? 

I don't want to look into your posts, i looked at the thread and and showed you proof that you did more than you said, anyway off for a shit put that in your flow chart for future reference.

[Bubo bubo]

Well in truth now Roch i stand by what i said, your post now gives/gave him a free run to accuse whoever he wants and i can see through what he's up to, by your saying In my opinion the problem here is not with David,  i'm telling you it is a very big part of the Problem.  He wants you to decide on Munksa and Curiosity now,  Munska who i belive is still an active member [i haven't even checked] and Curiosity, yet there's 100s of active members why them two ask yourself,   NGB will know why he brought Munska up.

It is an anagram of un mask

[David1819]

I'm not condoning David being overly suspicious.  But neither am I condoning Cambridge placing doubts in forum members' minds.  Which came first the chicken or the egg?

What was consumed first? The 4x Specialbrew or the Carlsberg Tactical Nuclear Penguin? 

That's a beautiful photo of you Cutie. Nice face

PS... I am not a lesbo

How about bi?  Best of both worlds 

Ehhhh???  No I love opposite sex too much.

[Roch]

Roch, quite frankly, it sounds to me, and I wouldn't mind betting, to one or two others, as if you're giving David carte blanche to poke and prod as he sees fit. Personally, I never gave Cambridge a second thought, but whenever there's a dispute, it usually turns out that David, and his spoon, are never far from the centre of it, whipping it up.

And it sounds to me that three of you give Cambridge carte blanche because you mistakenly think she is on the same side of the case as you.

[Hardy Boy]

And it sounds to me that three of you give Cambridge carte blanche because you mistakenly think she is on the same side of the case as you.

At first i honestly thought Curiosity was Hartley come back, it was obvious they were clued up