Emma Morris

[Roch]

Revenge for linking the profiles I guess.

Given what they were reading and deleting I doubt that.  If KE was not CC, there would have been a right hullabaloo by now.

[Zoso]

Given what they were reading and deleting I doubt that.  If KE was not CC, there would have been a right hullabaloo by now.

She did make a fuss and then got banned - however, that's by the by now. Clearly KE isn't coming back. The problem is the accusation that any and every new member is Holly or CC. New members shouldn't have to prove themselves to obsessed old members.

[Roch]

She did make a fuss and then got banned - however, that's by the by now. Clearly KE isn't coming back. The problem is the accusation that any and every new member is Holly or CC. New members shouldn't have to prove themselves to obsessed old members.

We seem to have reached an impasse.

[Hardy Boy]

Given what they were reading and deleting I doubt that.  If KE was not CC, there would have been a right hullabaloo by now.

Well in truth now Roch i stand by what i said, your post now gives/gave him a free run to accuse whoever he wants and i can see through what he's up to, by your saying In my opinion the problem here is not with David,  i'm telling you it is a very big part of the Problem.  He wants you to decide on Munksa and Curiosity now,  Munska who i belive is still an active member [i haven't even checked] and Curiosity, yet there's 100s of active members why them two ask yourself,   NGB will know why he brought Munska up.

[Zoso]

We seem to have reached an impasse.

Indeed. When I first came here, I was accused of being Keira. I'd never heard of this person and had not idea what the hell was going on. It went on for ages and nothing I said made the slightest difference. It's annoying and frustrating. I doubt any new member would bother to stay now and it's not like we get many new members to seat with - just the old ones griping about each other. 

[Roch]

Well in truth now Roch i stand by what i said, your post now gives/gave him a free run to accuse whoever he wants and i can see through what he's up to, by your saying In my opinion the problem here is not with David,  i'm telling you it is a very big part of the Problem.  He wants you to decide on Munksa and Curiosity now,  Munska who i belive is still an active member [i haven't even checked] and Curiosity, yet there's 100s of active members why them two ask yourself,   NGB will know why he brought Munska up.

I'm not condoning David being overly suspicious.  But neither am I condoning Cambridge placing doubts in forum members' minds.  Which came first the chicken or the egg?

[Zoso]

I'm not condoning David being overly suspicious.  But neither am I condoning Cambridge placing doubts in forum members' minds.  Which came first the chicken or the egg?

Think this has far more to do with certain posters personal differences than a real concern about more than one profile.

[Roch]

Think this has far more to do with certain posters personal differences than a real concern about more than one profile.

If you don't mind me saying, you are somewhat biased against David due to previous conflict.  All I suggest is, if we don't want forum members being wrongly accused of being other members, then don't cover members whose own antics feed in to those suspicions.  But you are. You are all covering for the member in question.. who lets face it, is no shrinking violet and can stick for herself.

[David1819]

I'm glad you bought Munska up, Munksa was me so you said, and I can assure you 1 billion per cent it wasn’t me.  I left the forum for a while and used to check over it now and again, I seen you accusing me of being Munksa, so I contacted NGB to tell the board it wasn’t me, whenever I have come back I announce it and my old profile I was under, I have nothing to hide, especially from YOU.   I left for personal reasons which NGB knows full well about.   Your obsession is your problem, it’s you who has got the illness which no one explores on here, your a full blown STALKER and always have been.

It was QC who first suggest that to me (see attachment). All I did was ask.

Contrary to popular misconception, I don't keep an eye out for anyone. People PM me with their suspicions and if I find it plausible I wont be afraid to ask on the forum. I don't know if other people get on the receiving end of such gossip or not. 

PS. If I was stalking you I would have been able to correct QC then and there and not get it wrong in the first place. 

[Zoso]

If you don't mind me saying, you are somewhat biased against David due to previous conflict.  All I suggest is, if we don't want forum members being wrongly accused of being other members, then don't cover members whose own antics feed in to those suspicions.  But you are. You are all covering for the member in question.. who lets face it, is no shrinking violet and can stick for herself.

That is my POINT, he is biased against Holly. I have no idea what the rest of your post means. I'm sticking up for Curiosity who I DO NOT believe is Holly. Do you even know that Killing Eve was Holly?

[Cambridgecutie]

I'm not looking for a fight at all...

But if what you say is true, why did KE systematically begin deleting your old posts, once KE's posts had been merged with your old posts?  Why didn't KE just protest and state their case? Whey would any member delete another member's posts?

I've no idea.  I rarely look in on the forum.  But I did read a post of KE's which I intended to respond to but didn't have time to then and there.  When I logged in to respond I read posts about KE and CC being one and the same.  I then realised that some of KE's posts were literally a copy and paste job from CC's!?  I note KE's profile has been deleted? 

Thought admin/mods had access to IP addresses?

[Hardy Boy]

It was QC who first suggest that to me (see attachment). All I did was ask. Contrary to popular misconception I don't keep an eye out for anyone. People PM me with their suspicions and if I find it plausible I wont be afraid to ask on the forum. I don't know if other people get on the receiving end of such gossip or not. 

PS. If I was stalking you I would have been able to correct QC then and there and not get it wrong in the first place.

You wouldn't even believe NGB when he told you several times.  Why have you bought this person up when there are 100s of active accounts

[Jane]

I'm not condoning David being overly suspicious.  But neither am I condoning Cambridge placing doubts in forum members' minds.  Which came first the chicken or the egg?

Roch, quite frankly, it sounds to me, and I wouldn't mind betting, to one or two others, as if you're giving David carte blanche to poke and prod as he sees fit. Personally, I never gave Cambridge a second thought, but whenever there's a dispute, it usually turns out that David, and his spoon, are never far from the centre of it, whipping it up.

[Zoso]

I've no idea.  I rarely look in on the forum.  But I did read a post of KE's which I intended to respond to but didn't have time to then and there.  When I logged in to respond I read posts about KE and CC being one and the same.  I then realised that some of KE's posts were literally a copy and paste job from CC's!?  I note KE's profile has been deleted? 

Thought admin/mods had access to IP addresses?

Yep

[Hardy Boy]

I'm not condoning David being overly suspicious.  But neither am I condoning Cambridge placing doubts in forum members' minds.  Which came first the chicken or the egg?

You still don't get it, probably Munska left because she/he was fed up of being called me, chicken and egg that one.