What time did Jeremy leave his house after his call to the police?

[Rob_]

Thank you. Perfect terrain for cycling.

It gets tougher once you past BHF.

[Adam]

It gets tougher once you past BHF.

How do you know?

Google Maps does not go up BHL.

[Rob_]

How do you know?

Google Maps does not go up BHL.

Because past BHF Google Maps only show the track going South towards the Sea wall.

[Adam]

Because past BHF Google Maps only show the track going South towards the Sea wall.

I don't understand that.

The BHF track from the B1026 (Maldon Road) to the B1023 (opposite Pages Lane) is excellent terrain for cycling or driving.

Your photos show this.

Would you cycle the Sea Wall or BHL route?

[Rob_]

Does this help?

[Rob_]

And this?

[Rob_]

I don't understand that.

The BHF track from the B1026 (Maldon Road) to the B1023 (opposite Pages Lane) is excellent terrain for cycling or driving.

Your photos show this.

Would you cycle the Sea Wall or BHL route?

The Sea Wall is the safest but Wycke Farm is a problem the route goes straight through it.

I should add those photos are not BHL but the track starting near the cemetery.

[Adam]

And this?

I have already seen this months ago. It is on Google Maps.

But good that you have posted the photos today.

[Adam]

The Sea Wall is the safest but Wycke Farm is a problem the route goes straight through it.

I should add those photos are not BHL but the track starting near the cemetery.

ILB will confirm if the farm track running to Farm A is cycle friendly when he does his visit.

On Google Maps it looks the same as Pages & BHL.

The right turn onto Pages Lane looks less cycle friendly. However Bamber was by then is close enough to walk to WHF.

[Rob_]

ILB will confirm if the farm track running to Farm A is cycle friendly when he does his visit.

On Google Maps it looks the same as Pages & BHL.

The right turn onto Pages Lane looks less cycle friendly. However Bamber was by then close enough to walk to WHF.

I agree Adam but the eternal problem to me is the 3.10 to 3.26 gap.

If Bamber just lies or lets the phone just ring and ring till he answers his own call no need for any gap at all.

If he uses his AM then I don't believe he has no where near enough time?

[Adam]

I agree Adam but the eternal problem to me is the 3.10 to 3.26 gap.

If Bamber just lies or lets the phone just ring and ring till he answers his own call no need for any gap at all.

If he uses his AM then I don't believe he has no where near enough time?

For me a 16 minute gap between Nevill's call & him calling the police is not suspiscious.

He rang Nevill back, rang Julie & looked through Yellow Pages.

[Adam]

Going by the gap between ringing Julie, then the police, it seems most likely he answered his own call. He knew he could explain a 16 minute gap. 

Or made no call at all from WHF.

He was in no rush to ring the police.

If ringing his AM, he would ring the police as soon as he got back. Not several minutes after ringing Julie.

[Rob_]

Going by the gap between ringing Julie, then the police, it seems most likely he answered his own call. He knew he could explain a 16 minute gap. 

Or made no call at all from WHF.

He was in no rush to ring the police.

If ringing his AM, he would ring the police as soon as he got back. Not several minutes after ringing Julie.

How many more times Adam if he answers his own call he does not need any gap.

[Adam]

How many more times Adam if he answers his own call he does not need any gap.

He can't say Nevill called me at 3.25am.

It would take more than a minute to -

Wake up.

Phone Nevill back.

Decide what to do.

Ring Julie.

Look through Yellow Pages.

----------

16 minutes is fine.

[Rob_]

He can't say Nevill called me at 3.25am.

It would take more than a minute to -

Wake up.

Phone Nevill back.

Decide what to do.

Ring Julie.

Look through Yellow Pages.

----------

16 minutes is fine.

What do you mean it is fine? Bamber if guilty would have had no delay.

If innocent I agree 16 minutes is fine.