0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
As said there are three methods of transport walk bike car As said he the defence had bigger fish to fry, even if the sea wall theory was bunked how did that counter Julie mugford and the silencer with Shelias blood.Moving back to transport, as said you say he could walk and he also had a car.I'm surprised the prosecution just didn't say " he made a journey " all three are feasible on paper, walking bike and carWhy was Nevills Citroen at Bourtree?
The prosecution would have wanted to submit a specific route to the jury. The route they chose passed least properties & used up less energy and time than walking. Saying he cycled on the main roads, one juror may say he wouldn't risk that. Which creates reasonable doubt.
Seems they alleged he walked to WHF, and returned by bike. I thought Julie had seen the bike at the weekend before at Jeremys cottage?
He cycled there and back. No point just doing one journey by bike. Julie testified she saw the bike 2 days before. The judge speaking about this in his summing up.
Have you got a transcript of justice drakes summing up ? A full one ? I have many documents but not that.I have seen excerpts
The judge said why would he bring a bike for Julie if the relationship had been coming to a close for 6 months. It is in Wilkes's book.