Barbara De"ath discussing sea wall

[Adam]

Can you post the actual route you are proposing Adam, because I cannot see a cycle path, a very unfriendly track maybe, but it's not a official public right of way?

https://www.jeremy-bamber.co.uk/bicycle

Route 6978. The prosecution route.

You will have to go on Google Maps satellite to see the cycle path from Pages Lane to The Sea Wall.

You can enlarge Google Maps. You will see the cycle path is around the width of a car.

But appreciate you will always call it 'a very unfriendly track'. 

[Adam]

ILB says The Sea Wall is 'heavily populated'.

Then says there is no access to it!

[Adam]

A cycle path the width of a car (me). Or 'a very unfriendly track' (Rob). 

Either way the prosecution said he cycled it. Which was only 0.4 miles.

ILB will post lots of photos of it after his visit.

[ILB]

Each to there own.

You are more reckless. Which resulted in a 12 stretch.

I would take the least risk approach - passing no properties.

9 and half years actually.

[Adam]

I have realised ILB is a 'disrupter' poster.

He will dispute everything that goes against Bamber. This is because he has a beef with the legal system as an ex prisoner.

This disrupting will be by debate, name calling, abuse, goading, denial, GIF's, unrelated images & diversion.

I hope he is honest when taking photos.

[Adam]

At least Rob says there is 'a very unfriendly track'.

Wouldn't call a track as wide as a car that. Besides which no one said a route that avoided all properties was going to have the red carpet laid out.

[ILB]

I have realised ILB is a 'disrupter' poster.

He will dispute everything that goes against Bamber. This is because he has a beef with the legal system as an ex prisoner.

This disrupting will be by debate, name calling, abuse, goading, denial, GIF's, unrelated images & diversion.

I hope he is honest when taking photos.

Completely wrong as per usual.

I have no issue with the police or the legal system.I just call it how it is. A common sense approach.

You give abuse out as well, you are ageist, and you like to dictate the agenda. You are a troll. I've seen you been called out for such on the Jeremy Bamber FB discussion group.

In this particular instancr ou are making false claims about the sea wall. How am I sticking up for Bamber? I am on the fence. I believe if gulity he drove. Which I've referenced on numerous occasions.

What do you want me to say to your bullshit theories? " Oh yes jolly good Adam"  " that sounds right "

You can't blame me if I disagree. It's a forum.

[Adam]

Completely wrong as per usual.

I have no issue with the police or the legal system.I just call it how it is. A common sense approach.

You give abuse out as well, you are ageist, and you like to dictate the agenda. You are a troll. I've seen you been called out for such on the Jeremy Bamber FB discussion group.

What do you want me to say to your bullshit theories? " Oh yes jolly good Adam"

You can't blame me if I disagree. It's a forum.

You agree you dispute everything that goes against Bamber? Using the methods I mentioned.

Bit hard to deny it as it's all over the forum!

I will call you a name if you call me one.

Mike & Guest29835 also had a beef with the police. Everyone has there reasons for supporting Bamber.

[Adam]

Anyway -

The prosecution believe Bamber took a left turn up the cycle path to Pages Lane - 0.4 miles.

I agree & using 2024 technology believe the cycle path was as wide as a car.

Rob believes it looks like a 'very unfriendly track'.

ILB says there is no track & no access to the heavily populated Sea Wall!

[ILB]

You agree you dispute everything that goes against Bamber? Using the methods I mentioned.

Bit hard to deny it as it's all over the forum!

I will call you a name if you call me one.

Mike & Guest29835 had a beef with the police. Everyone has there reasons for supporting Bamber.

I am not a supporter.

I just have an interest in the case.

You are trying to goad, you have been called out for this on Facebook.

[Adam]

I am not a supporter.

I just have an interest in the case.

You are trying to goad, you have been called out for this on Facebook.

Says the man who posts GIF's.

You are a supporter. A hardcore one as well. You dispute all evidence against Bamber.

[Adam]

Anyway -

The prosecution believe Bamber took a left turn up the cycle path to Pages Lane - 0.4 miles.

I agree & using 2024 technology believe the cycle path was as wide as a car.

Rob believes it looks like a 'very unfriendly track'.

ILB says there is no track & no access to the heavily populated Sea Wall!

Anyway, I can't see these stances changing. One of them is 39 years old!

[ILB]

Says the man who posts GIF's.

You are a supporter. A hardcore one as well. You dispute all evidence against Bamber.

If you post things I disagree with. I will highlight it and give my opinion.

It is not my fault I can't agree with most of if not all  of your theories. Which are often not backed up and bordering on the ridiculous. I don't apologise for that.

[ILB]

Anyway, I can't see these stances changing. One of them is 39 years old!

I guess the landscape must have changed then.

Adam is suggesting the  five fields that are between the sea wall and WHF must have been planted in 1987.

[Adam]

I guess the landscape must have changed then.

Adam is suggesting the  five fields that are between the sea wall and WHF must have been planted in 1987.

ILB is suggesting there are no cycle paths between fields.

Leading from Pages Lane to the 'heavily populated' Sea Wall.

Even Rob disagrees!