Author Topic: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85  (Read 23491 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13798
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #195 on: September 03, 2017, 07:02:PM »
I'm confused by this 999 call at 6.09. Was there or wasn't there a 999 call made from what at 6.09 and if not why does it say there was in the stokenchurch enquiry.

The phone operator transferred the WHF phone to a police station via a 999 line so the police could listen in.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #196 on: September 03, 2017, 07:14:PM »
The phone operator transferred the WHF phone to a police station via a 999 line so the police could listen in.

Not strictly correct.  According to her she did not use a 999 line. 
« Last Edit: September 03, 2017, 07:25:PM by Roch »

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #197 on: September 03, 2017, 07:17:PM »
Not stricly correct.  According to her she did not use a 999 line.

This is just something and nothing.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #198 on: September 03, 2017, 07:20:PM »
This is just something and nothing.

Well whether it's something or nothing - I couldn't say for certain.  But the operator didn't use a 999 line and that's my point.   

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #199 on: September 03, 2017, 07:22:PM »
Well whether it's something or nothing - I couldn't say for certain.  But the operator didn't use a 999 line and that's my point.

So he just said the wrong thing.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17594
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #200 on: September 03, 2017, 07:24:PM »
So he just said the wrong thing.

I think there are several possibilities - but the above is one of them.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13798
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #201 on: September 03, 2017, 07:24:PM »
Not stricly correct.  According to her she did not use a 999 line.

"999" line then  ::)

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44576
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #202 on: September 03, 2017, 07:43:PM »
I'm confused by this 999 call at 6.09. Was there or wasn't there a 999 call made from what at 6.09 and if not why does it say there was in the stokenchurch enquiry.

There could have been a 999 call from WHF.

Maybe it was Nevill after realising the police still hadn't arrived at WHF, 2 hours & 43 minutes after he rang them at 3.26am.

Or maybe it was Sheila who rang to tell the police she had killed everyone but her & Crispy were alright. 

Surprised neither of them heard the police outside.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2017, 07:48:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #203 on: September 03, 2017, 07:51:PM »
There could have been a 999 call from WHF.

Maybe it was Nevill after realising the police still hadn't arrived at WHF, 2 hours & 43 minutes after he rang them at 3.26am.

Or maybe it was Sheila who rang to tell the police she had killed everyone but her & Crispy were alright. 

Surprised neither of them heard the police outside.

Adam  ;D
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13798
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #204 on: September 03, 2017, 08:36:PM »
There could have been a 999 call from WHF.

Maybe it was Nevill after realising the police still hadn't arrived at WHF, 2 hours & 43 minutes after he rang them at 3.26am.

Or maybe it was Sheila who rang to tell the police she had killed everyone but her & Crispy were alright. 

Surprised neither of them heard the police outside.

It wont be long till there are alleged outgoing calls from June, Daniel and Nicholas also.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44576
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #205 on: September 03, 2017, 09:00:PM »
The CT can always give possible reasons why a call was made at 6.09am. Rather than just say there was one.

I don't know why Nevill would call Chelmsford at 3.26am. Then call 999 at 6.09am.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2017, 09:00:PM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline notsure

  • Senior Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1684
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #206 on: September 04, 2017, 12:20:AM »
So we will add it to the list of 'mistakes' then....... this list is getting very long

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #207 on: September 04, 2017, 12:24:AM »
The information originally provided indicates that Insp. Burrell simply assumed how the monitoring had been arranged. We can now see that his assumption was wrong. No evidence has been posted here that a 999 call was made or that Nevill used a "panic button". Although mike tesko asserts that a record exists of the latter, he hasn't posted any police data that clearly supports his assertion. Didn't he some time ago post that someone was dead, only to be informed that the person was in fact alive? Nothing more was posted about their "death" after that.

Offline Caroline

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 27076
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #208 on: September 04, 2017, 12:59:AM »
The information originally provided indicates that Insp. Burrell simply assumed how the monitoring had been arranged. We can now see that his assumption was wrong. No evidence has been posted here that a 999 call was made or that Nevill used a "panic button". Although mike tesko asserts that a record exists of the latter, he hasn't posted any police data that clearly supports his assertion. Didn't he some time ago post that someone was dead, only to be informed that the person was in fact alive? Nothing more was posted about their "death" after that.

Evidence has been posted to the contrary and even Jeremy has stated their was no panic button - I don't know why we keep revisiting this, it's just silly.
Few people have the imagination for reality

Offline Reader

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2456
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #209 on: September 04, 2017, 01:58:AM »
If apparently reliable informants are in fact providing mike tesko with misinformation, this would tend to lead to some things being discussed again. It's hard to avoid that.