Author Topic: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85  (Read 23494 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44576
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #210 on: September 04, 2017, 02:35:PM »
The claim from supporters is it was Sheila making the call at 6.09am. No one seeing her do this through the kitchen window.

The phone call was after Sheila had -  

Fired 26 bullets. 
Re loaded twice. 
Chambered twice. 
Breached twice. 
Fought Nevill. 
Postioned Nevill onto a coal scuttle.
Burnt Nevill's back. 
Wrote a long suicide note. 
Got the bible. 
Read the bible. 
Had a shower. 
Changed. 

Supporters could have said it was either Nevill or Sheila making the call. Either way it would make Bamber innocent. However Nevill being alive for 2 hours 21 minutes after the police arrived & not letting the police know is not realistic.

It is of course much more realistic Sheila would stay alive & then dial 999 at 6.09am.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.


Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #212 on: September 04, 2017, 02:48:PM »
Well if none of the officers present made a call for ambulances------and up to now nobody has admitted dong so-------it could only have been Sheila who'd still been alive inside the farmhouse.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33788
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #213 on: September 04, 2017, 03:17:PM »
Well if none of the officers present made a call for ambulances------and up to now nobody has admitted dong so-------it could only have been Sheila who'd still been alive inside the farmhouse.

I'd have thought an ambulance would have been de rigueur once the firearms team was called.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #214 on: September 04, 2017, 03:34:PM »
I'd have thought an ambulance would have been de rigueur once the firearms team was called.





It obviously wasn't.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33788
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #215 on: September 04, 2017, 03:41:PM »




It obviously wasn't.

Why would that be?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #216 on: September 04, 2017, 03:56:PM »
Why would that be?





How would I know ? Why don't you answer the question ?

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #217 on: September 04, 2017, 04:01:PM »
Why didn't EP send for an ambulance for standby when they initially arrived at the farmhouse ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33788
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #218 on: September 04, 2017, 04:10:PM »




How would I know ? Why don't you answer the question ?

You said "It obviously wasn't". I asked why you would say that. You ask "How would I know?" So what was the point of stating "It obviously wasn't" if you didn't categorically KNOW that the ambulances weren't automatically called in conjunction with the firearms team.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #219 on: September 04, 2017, 04:18:PM »
You said "It obviously wasn't". I asked why you would say that. You ask "How would I know?" So what was the point of stating "It obviously wasn't" if you didn't categorically KNOW that the ambulances weren't automatically called in conjunction with the firearms team.






I answered by stating that no officer/s has admitted to having rang for an ambulance. That's the " obvious " bit.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33788
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #220 on: September 04, 2017, 04:37:PM »





I answered by stating that no officer/s has admitted to having rang for an ambulance. That's the " obvious " bit.

 You made no mention of "officer/s" until this moment. I doubt anyone would have had to have done it manually. Given that all these alleged telephone lines were being opened/non existent panic alarms in use, I feel quite certain there was a legitimate one opened somewhere.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #221 on: September 04, 2017, 05:04:PM »
You made no mention of "officer/s" until this moment. I doubt anyone would have had to have done it manually. Given that all these alleged telephone lines were being opened/non existent panic alarms in use, I feel quite certain there was a legitimate one opened somewhere.





I assume that each officer had been equipped with a radio,but little assistance had been called for by anyone until nearly 3 hours later as it was, so I suppose calling for an ambulance hadn't been a priority.
It's usually a given that where a seige situation exists,an ambulance is on standby.

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33788
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #222 on: September 04, 2017, 05:27:PM »




I assume that each officer had been equipped with a radio,but little assistance had been called for by anyone until nearly 3 hours later as it was, so I suppose calling for an ambulance hadn't been a priority.
It's usually a given that where a seige situation exists,an ambulance is on standby.

I guess they'd have waited until they were absolutely certain that no one was going to walk out of the farm house. A firearms team being present lessens the likelihood of that happening. Until they were present, I guess a siege situation isn't positive.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #223 on: September 04, 2017, 05:42:PM »
I guess they'd have waited until they were absolutely certain that no one was going to walk out of the farm house. A firearms team being present lessens the likelihood of that happening. Until they were present, I guess a siege situation isn't positive.





Well the hint was big enough----firearms at the farmhouse and an unbalanced woman in-situ there ?

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33788
Re: Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85
« Reply #224 on: September 04, 2017, 06:00:PM »




Well the hint was big enough----firearms at the farmhouse and an unbalanced woman in-situ there ?

IF she was alive -which she wasn't- there was every possibility that she could have curled up and gone to sleep. Such can be the way when psychosis wears off.