Inspector D Burrell 13/09/85

[guest2181]

Oh no we might be back to the phones again. If you read Jeremy's statement again the police don't originally say the call did not happen they seem to just say it should not have been his father that called . But Jeremy asks him to check the phone records to prove the call  . So he seems to think they could have checked ? And there were two lines I think one was a business line.

I know that there was only a single line, but yes JB seemed to think it could be checked, which is why I have a theory that JB made the call to his answering machine to reinforce his alibi.  Although it now seems that it couldn't be checked. 

[Caroline]

I know that there was only a single line, but yes JB seemed to think it could be checked, which is why I have a theory that JB made the call to his answering machine to reinforce his alibi.  Although it now seems that it couldn't be checked. 

IT COULDN'T  ( )

[Jan]

You don't have to if you do your own research - sorry for providing the info, which by the way, CAN be verified. Clearly they said it could be checked out because they were trying to trap MM which meakes it clear that believed Julie when she said Bamber told her MM was the hitman.

So it's ok to lie to get your man then .

Really .

[guest2181]

IT COULDN'T  ( )

 

[lookout]

Yes,business calls weren't separate from house calls being as it was just the one line going into the property so N&J Bamber was run from the same line.

[Jan]

I know that there was only a single line, but yes JB seemed to think it could be checked, which is why I have a theory that JB made the call to his answering machine to reinforce his alibi.  Although it now seems that it couldn't be checked. 

Obviously Jeremy had a stupid alibi that he had not checked out then . And yet he magically managed to have the intelligence to hide every other single bit of evidence . He is a strange one . Stupid or intelligent . Depends on how it fits the situation as far as I can see .

[Caroline]

So it's ok to lie to get your man then .

Really .

If you have nothing to hise, it won't matter. You don't think that happens? 

[Jan]

Yes,business calls weren't separate from house calls being as it was just the one line going into the property so N&J Bamber was run from the same line.

Thank you lookout .

I stand corrected .

[Jan]

If you have nothing to hise, it won't matter. You don't think that happens? 

Obviously I think it happens there are cases to prove that is what the police have done.

And this might be another one.

Do I think it's morally right ? That's a different matter

[Steve_uk]

Obviously Jeremy had a stupid alibi that he had not checked out then . And yet he magically managed to have the intelligence to hide every other single bit of evidence . He is a strange one . Stupid or intelligent . Depends on how it fits the situation as far as I can see .

He had been entering and exiting the windows at White House Farm since childhood. All the other "evidence" he left out on display.

[susan]

Obviously Jeremy had a stupid alibi that he had not checked out then . And yet he magically managed to have the intelligence to hide every other single bit of evidence . He is a strange one . Stupid or intelligent . Depends on how it fits the situation as far as I can see .

Jan think the answer to that one is neither stupid or intelligent just innocent so phone calls,windows and all the other evidence he left not sure what it was but simply does not apply.

[Caroline]

Obviously I think it happens there are cases to prove that is what the police have done.

And this might be another one.

Do I think it's morally right ? That's a different matter

I don't think the law is  moral animal.

[lookout]

I don't think the law is  moral animal.

It's not meant to be.

[Jan]

I don't think the law is  moral animal.

that's a another whole deeper discussion.

But if they lied to try and trap Malcolm then its obvious they would be willing to do the same to get Jeremy .

If and why the change happened has yet to be revealed .

[notsure]

I'm confused by this 999 call at 6.09. Was there or wasn't there a 999 call made from what at 6.09 and if not why does it say there was in the stokenchurch enquiry.