If I may just mention Mr Harrisons book one more time,concerning the burns to Nevills back,or should I say the lack of any mention of them at all.
Now I cant remember if they are spoken about anywhere else in the book,but they dont seem to be mentioned in the scenario which was sent to Harrison from the ex-con.
Now,I know I keep going on about the importance of the Aga causing the burns,but I really do think that if this 'theory' is accepted it has far wider implications than you may think ie,none of the witnesses mention Nevill lying against the Aga.Harrisons informant says that Nevill ran down stairs and was manhandled into a chair before being beaten and shot,no mention of burns at all that I can see,and definately no mention of Nevill lying on the floor for any length of time.
Now it is the same with Julie's statement,McDonald tells JB that the old man put up a fearsome fight,but no mention of him lying on the floor beside the Aga for a spell.
Now,I dont know who thinks Harrisons informant is reliable,but if you do,how do you account for the omission of the Aga burns? An activity which would have seen Nevill lying against the Aga for a considerable length of time.
The informant does not mention JB and Sheila knocking Nevill to the floor and then moving him away from the Aga several minutes later.Why didn't JB tell the informant this detail? Doesn't this discredit Harrisons book completely?
Ok,ok,only if you believe the Aga made the marks you are screaming.Well,I think the Aga marks will be accepted by the CCRC for reasons already given.If so,I think we can write off the alleged ex-con story.
And what about Julie,cant the same be said about her? What about the police scenario?
The thing is,none of the scenarios put forward mention a break in the massacre while Nevill is lying against the Aga. Every one has Nevill simply beaten then shot.
It is a very,very uncomfortable event to insert into a JB scenario indeed,an inconvenience as Roch put it.
In a nutshell,no one mentions Nevill lying against the Aga,not JB,not the ex-con,not Julie and not the police.Is this because the only person to see Nevill lying against the Aga was Sheila?
Now I know that Bubo and the campaign team claim that the police knew about Nevill lying against the Aga and moved him onto the chair, but does this make sense?
If the police moved Nevill wouldn't they have known that the Aga caused the burns? Did they hide this knowledge? Did Vanezis know? Has the police known from the start what caused the burns?
Still,they were small marks,so Nevill may have been moved without anyone noticing them.
No matter how you look at it,the ex-con and Sheila are totally unreliable witnesses by omitting the fact that Nevill was lying by the Aga mid massacre for several minutes or maybe even hours.
