Ballistics manipulation

[Bubo bubo]

Thanks Dave.
Perry Mason,Conan Doyle?

It was this language use that spelled trouble and I never believed a word he posted. I saw him as an interloper trying to gain favour from innocence members.

[snow66!]

It was this language use that spelled trouble and I never believed a word he posted. I saw him as an interloper trying to gain favour from innocence members.

I dont really get it Bubo,was Harrison on the guilty side or the innocence side?

I haven't read any of his posts,are they still on the forum? Seems once someone is banned they get a guest number which makes it difficult to find their posts.
Have got his book,didn't think much of the JB/Sheila scenario.

[Zoso]

Thanks Dave.
Perry Mason,Conan Doyle?

If you want to know anything about MD being a member here, then you shouldn't be asking a member who wasn't even here at the time and knows nothing of what went on. Also, you're allowing another member to goad.

[snow66!]

If you want to know anything about MD being a member here, then you shouldn't be asking a member who wasn't even here at the time and knows nothing of what went on. Also, you're allowing another member to goad.

I dont understand Zoso,who is being goaded? I am not looking to cause any trouble,I am a friend to everyone who will have me,you know this Zoso.

I dont goad or cause hurt to anyone.

[Adam]

I dont really get it Bubo,was Harrison on the guilty side or the innocence side?

I haven't read any of his posts,are they still on the forum? Seems once someone is banned they get a guest number which makes it difficult to find their posts.
Have got his book,didn't think much of the JB/Sheila scenario.

If you have got his book, you must know if he is on the guilty or innocence side.

[Zoso]

I dont really get it Bubo,was Harrison on the guilty side or the innocence side?

I haven't read any of his posts,are they still on the forum? Seems once someone is banned they get a guest number which makes it difficult to find their posts.
Have got his book,didn't think much of the JB/Sheila scenario.

If you have read his book and didn't think much of it, why do you care what he thinks/thought? He seemed genuine at the time, turned out not to be but it's amazing how many people 'had suspicions about him all along' AFTER his downfall. You would think they would make a better detective here, given their insight!

[Zoso]

I dont understand Zoso,who is being goaded? I am not looking to cause any trouble,I am a friend to everyone who will have me,you know this Zoso.

I dont goad or cause hurt to anyone.

Oh COME ON! Snow, you're NOT that naïve?

[Bubo bubo]

If you want to know anything about MD being a member here, then you shouldn't be asking a member who wasn't even here at the time and knows nothing of what went on. Also, you're allowing another member to goad.

Wrong again and totally up the Swaney with this. I used this site and the red forum to gain access to case documents etc. I was a longstanding guest. I would follow posting from time to time but did my own analysis and thinking. I did not want my conclusions to be clouded by the likes of Caroline who for the second day in a row jumps in with an answer that is rubbish and shows just how biased she has become. The two sites were my best chance of finding facts.

[Bubo bubo]

I dont understand Zoso,who is being goaded? I am not looking to cause any trouble,I am a friend to everyone who will have me,you know this Zoso.

I dont goad or cause hurt to anyone.

Be careful Snow only guilters are allowed to goad and if you do  you will be hauled over the coals.

[Bubo bubo]

Oh COME ON! Snow, you're NOT that naïve?

The problem you caused was because you bringing up the issue in an enquiring manner allowed David1819 to tease Zoso about her being taken in by this rogue and contributing to his discredited work on the case by way of providing information that was published in his paperback.

[snow66!]

I will have another look at the book before I say any more.

[David1819]

I dont really get it Bubo,was Harrison on the guilty side or the innocence side?

He started out writing a book that would be pro innocence but then changed to guilty when he fell out with the CT and Stan Jones died.

His MO was to make claims based on dead people who couldn't deny what was written about them. Hence he promptly informed NGB about an impressive volume of interview notes involving Stan Jones shortly after Stan Jones died despite making no such claims prior.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5042.msg215709.html#msg215709

[snow66!]

If you have got his book, you must know if he is on the guilty or innocence side.

Well he says it was both JB AND Sheila Adam,he says he believes this to be true.
So he must think JB is indeed guilty.

[snow66!]

The problem you caused was because you bringing up the issue in an enquiring manner allowed David1819 to tease Zoso about her being taken in by this rogue and contributing to his discredited work on the case by way of providing information that was published in his paperback.

Ah,I see Bubo. Well I AM that naive,I didn't know any of this,how could I?

[snow66!]

He started out writing a book that would be pro innocence but then changed to guilty when he fell out with the CT and Stan Jones died.

His MO was to make claims based on dead people who couldn't deny what was written about them. Hence he promptly informed NGB about an impressive volume of interview notes involving Stan Jones shortly after Stan Jones died despite making no such claims prior.

https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,5042.msg215709.html#msg215709

Thanks Dave.I think I will leave it there as far as Harrison is concerned to avoid opening up old wounds,which is not my intention.I will simply read Harrisons book again at my leasure.