The window Jeremy used for entry

[Zoso]

Stupid remark IMO it is obvious I am suggesting the police.

Crusty response IMO and you're making 'assumptions'.

[Zoso]

Yet you still doubt the Aga made them Zoso?

Completely.

[Bubo bubo]

Crusty response IMO and you're making 'assumptions'.

Please list the assumptions since you give no reference as to what I am assuming. Crusty or not I found your response childish even Adam new who THEY were. You seem to be a bit ratty these days.

[Bubo bubo]

Have you got a source for that?

Not just Yvonne saying it is the case on a podcast.

Surely you have watched the video. The pictures show an almost perfect match.

[Adam]

Surely you have watched the video. The pictures show an almost perfect match.

Please provide the link. Preferably with the minute where it shows an almost exact match.

[Bubo bubo]

Please provide the link. Preferably with the minute where it shows an almost exact match.

As requested

https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2022/11/28/4390679038784094075/640x360_MP4_4390679038784094075.mp4

[Roch]

Completely.

On what grounds. You have no grounds for doing so.

[Zoso]

On what grounds. You have no grounds for doing so.

On what grounds? Seriously? The grounds are the whole 'Nevill must have been unconscious for X amount of time' I don't believe he lay there unconscious and then called Jeremy. I think the whole suggestion is ludicrous and even more, that the police perched him on the chair/coal scuttle as seen in the SC photographs with his PJ's pulled down. WHY?

[Roch]

On what grounds? Seriously? The grounds are the whole 'Nevill must have been unconscious for X amount of time' I don't believe he lay there unconscious and then called Jeremy. I think the whole suggestion is ludicrous and even more, that the police perched him on the chair/coal scuttle as seen in the SC photographs with his PJ's pulled down. WHY?

That's not what I asked.

[Zoso]

That's not what I asked.

Splain?

[Zoso]

Please list the assumptions since you give no reference as to what I am assuming. Crusty or not I found your response childish even Adam new who THEY were. You seem to be a bit ratty these days.

I was talking about the rugs - they're just rugs. I don't see an issue with them.

[Roch]

Splain?

I was trying to ask about the question in in post 531 and your answer to it 'completely'.  Under what grounds can you difinitively rule out the Aga as the cause?

[Bubo bubo]

I was talking about the rugs - they're just rugs. I don't see an issue with them.

Yes of course they are rugs. I suggested that they may have been created from the repurposing of a carpet. The main focus was the rug by the Aga which showed no blood. I outline the possible reasons for this in my post.

[snow66!]

Splain?

Roch is simply asking why you dismiss the possibility that the Aga made the burns so completely Zoso.He is not asking you to endorse his scenario surrounding the marks.

[Adam]

As requested

https://videos.dailymail.co.uk/video/mol/2022/11/28/4390679038784094075/640x360_MP4_4390679038784094075.mp4

Thanks. Not very convincing. The man was leaning against the aga as if his life depended on it.

Doubt that any part of the outside of the aga got any more than lukewarm.

Good to see Boyce topping up his pension.