0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Jackiepreece on July 25, 2011, 07:44:PMPB there is more chance of you being the person responsible of the murders at WHF than there is of Jeremy being responsible. You could possibly be the person seen running away from WHF.I have never read or heard from Jeremy himself any kind of bitterness or hatred that you show on an hourly basis and that is even though continual lies have been told about him. It is for anyone who knows this case and writes to Jeremy everyone comments on. Neville might not have been Jeremys natural father but he must have learnt something good from him.You really are a nasty piece of work god knows who dragged you upHa ha. You really are a sad Bamber groupie aren't you ..... what else has a multiple murderer got to do than be sweetness and light to his desperately lonely, no doubt middleaged, sad groupies?All the famous sick murderers have attracted such strange sad women; Ted Bundy had loads of them as did Richard Ramirez ... what attraction do you have to the vilest of scumbags like Bamber?Funny and yet very sad :'(
PB there is more chance of you being the person responsible of the murders at WHF than there is of Jeremy being responsible. You could possibly be the person seen running away from WHF.I have never read or heard from Jeremy himself any kind of bitterness or hatred that you show on an hourly basis and that is even though continual lies have been told about him. It is for anyone who knows this case and writes to Jeremy everyone comments on. Neville might not have been Jeremys natural father but he must have learnt something good from him.You really are a nasty piece of work god knows who dragged you up
Hartley you always bring me up when you are in trouble the difference is I can stand up for myself even if you come in twos with your mate John you liked him that says it all.I'm no legal expert I am no gun expert or ammunition expert but I know when something's wrong and something is seriously very seriously wrong with this case and you know it. As for Julie Mugford either way telling the truth or lying I have never personally come across anyone so wicked and manipulative in my life and from everything I have read about her she was completely capable of sitting in that witness box lying through her teeth seeing pound notes in front of her eyes.Julie Mugford put Jeremy in prison that is a factWhat is it I said about her Hartley is that what you are referring to I wish the lying nasty piece of work would sue me in fact I am begging her toIf you are friends of the family I bet you know some of the missing pieces of the jigsaw so you might one day think of coming clean yourself
i cant believe it you'll be saying colin stags innocent next.
Quote from: Poor Bambi on July 25, 2011, 04:47:PMQuote from: Jackiepreece on July 25, 2011, 04:38:PMPB I am not even going to respond to your posts anymore you have absolutely nothing to say but keep hanging off the back of HartleyOh dear that's upsetting! Actually Jacks, you should be glad Bamber has a whole life tarriff. You would be dropped like a bad habit if he ever got out. Unless you're rich of course, in which case you'd probably get murdered too!But I am glad you're going to stop nibbling my ankles.Take care now!PB you really are becoming boring now. No facts from you, just drivel.If you were pro Bamber Hartley would have torn you to shreds.
Quote from: Jackiepreece on July 25, 2011, 04:38:PMPB I am not even going to respond to your posts anymore you have absolutely nothing to say but keep hanging off the back of HartleyOh dear that's upsetting! Actually Jacks, you should be glad Bamber has a whole life tarriff. You would be dropped like a bad habit if he ever got out. Unless you're rich of course, in which case you'd probably get murdered too!But I am glad you're going to stop nibbling my ankles.Take care now!
PB I am not even going to respond to your posts anymore you have absolutely nothing to say but keep hanging off the back of Hartley
Quote from: Hartley on July 25, 2011, 05:31:PMQuote from: Jackiepreece on July 25, 2011, 05:09:PMYou said you agree everything should be released under PII is that correctYes that is correct, however I would need to see the wording of such a petition.NGB will likely be able to inform you that in the first instance many items which have not been released, are not actually withheld under PII, some items have just simply not been released. You should also be aware that the laws regarding PII did not exist back in 1985/6 in the format they are today.There is also a process for applying for the release of documents.But show me the wording and then I'll decide, can't say fairer than that.Hartley - you are quite right, PII is the reason for non disclosure of a number of documents but there are other reasons, such as the "opt outs" under the Freedom of Information Act and Data Protection Act, which have been used used to justify withholding other documents. You are also correct in pointing out that PII did not apply at the time of the trial - there was the broadly equivalent "Crown Immunity" and the Attorney General's Guidelines on disclosure. However efforts to obtain documents now are governed by the current law so PII is now used to cover some of the documents in this case. There are procedures for challenging PII but they are expensive and difficult, particularly outside the context of a trial which is taking place. A lot of material could have been obtained by the CCRC using their powers but they have appeared very reluctant to use those powers.
Quote from: Jackiepreece on July 25, 2011, 05:09:PMYou said you agree everything should be released under PII is that correctYes that is correct, however I would need to see the wording of such a petition.NGB will likely be able to inform you that in the first instance many items which have not been released, are not actually withheld under PII, some items have just simply not been released. You should also be aware that the laws regarding PII did not exist back in 1985/6 in the format they are today.There is also a process for applying for the release of documents.But show me the wording and then I'll decide, can't say fairer than that.
You said you agree everything should be released under PII is that correct
Quote from: wichfinder on July 25, 2011, 09:23:PMi cant believe it you'll be saying colin stags innocent next.Well said and welcome back.
IT PISSES ME OFF HARTLEY, GUILTYS COME HERE AND JUST SLATE ANYONE WHO THINKS JB COULD POSSIBLY BE INNOCENT.I GET SICK AND FUCKING TIRED OF HEARING THE SAME OLD SHITE. IM NOT SAD, IM CERTAINLY NO GROUPIE EITHER, IM 41 YRS OLD IS THAT MIDDLE AGED NOWADAYS? I DONT KNOW.THIS POST ISNT AIMED AT YOU HARTLEY BY THE WAY, YOU BELEIVE JB IS GUILTY AND FAIR PLAY TO YA, AT LEAST YOU DONT INSULT ALL WOMEN THAT SUPPORT JB.SO PB WHY DONT YOU JUST FUCK OFF. OR FAILING THAT DEBATE PROPERLY WITHOUT RESORTING TO SLAGGING PEOPLE OFFRANT OVER.....FOR NOW
ok.
