From Wilkes book--;In fact both John Hayward and the Judge admitted that the blood could have been a mixture of Nevill and June Bambers blood,but that this was a remote possibility,' They claim that only DNA testing could prove the point beyond any doubt,I n the absence of DNA testing,they declared in a report compiled for the Home Office in 1990, 'it would be impossible to differentiate between one person's blood and another,--
Also the blood should have been tested in solution to be sure it was from only one person,Hayward later admitted that he did not think this had been done,and that it was not routine procedure,
Later,Hayward also did tests to see if the silencer heated up after being firsd numerous times to dry out blood inside it.The silencer did not heat up and the blood remained liquid,so could easily mix with further blood entering into it.
And isn't it strange that Bamber has always pushed to have exhibits re-examined if he is guilty? Why try to DNA test the silencer in 2002 if he knew it was Sheilas blood inside it? He would have done everything he could to prevent the test surely,else it would have ended his charade.
Indeed it was the police who illegally destroyed evidence which could have helped clear things up.And didn;t the testing of the silencer find an unknown males DNA?
No,I dont think its just quite as cut and dried as Cutie and Adam believe.