Telecoms in 1985

[Adam]

Yes I have seen it Adam and like Cc do not agree with it sorry, if someone does something it's for a reason.

As Munksa said JB planned the crime for months, perhaps your scenario can reflect this? at the moment it looks like the red mist came down and JB did the crime on the spur of the moment?

Fair enough.

I can do no more than create a straight forward scenario which matches the crime scene evidence.

[Adam]

The phone off the hook at WHF is Bamber's obvious way of saying 'Nevill called me'.

Suspect he knew a call could not be traced.

[ILB]

The technology did not exist.

In 1978 the BTK killer claimed his eighth victim. He made an anaoymous phonecall from a public phone box. The police never knew the killer at that time. His identity not confirmed till 2005 but They could trace the call to that payphone. On a residential street. And the timing of that call

I find it unfeasable that the technology did not exist across the Atlantic in 1985. In fact I believe that in the 1983 case of brinks mat phonecall tracing and times were used

[guest29835]

And others are not looking at the case logically? Only you are?

I have challenged and answered  every question of yours! But instead of counter arguing you say, I am not thinking logically, I offended you, I didn't come with answers to satisfy you blah blah blah...

It's you who perceive others below you, you patronize  and criticize.

Please don't blow your own trumpet trying to sound intelligent, you really arnt! The FACT is you know nothing more than I or anyone else here do! Get that into your skull. Now, how does that sound?

I don't want to spoil for others but time to ignore you again.

You have read into my response more than what is there.  I believe this reflects your own insecurities.

I simply approach the case logically and ask questions.  The case against Jeremy Bamber doesn't add up.  That's not my fault.  You respond by insulting me and attacking me, as if I've insulted your honour.

It's crazy.

[Munksa]

In 1978 the BTK killer claimed his eighth victim. He made an anaoymous phonecall from a public phone box. The police never knew the killer at that time. His identity not confirmed till 2005 but They could trace the call to that payphone. On a residential street. And the timing of that call

I find it unfeasable that the technology did not exist across the Atlantic in 1985. In fact I believe that in the 1983 case of brinks mat phonecall tracing and times were used

Payphone is not same as residential line. Completely different ILB.

A simple question to you ILB, if it existed, don't you think the Defence would have digged it out as this call was crucial ?

[Munksa]

You have read into my response more than what is there.  I believe this reflects your own insecurities.

I simply approach the case logically and ask questions.  The case against Jeremy Bamber doesn't add up.  That's not my fault.  You respond by insulting me and attacking me, as if I've insulted your honour.

It's crazy.

Be a man! Victim playing . Awwww I insulted you and attacked you now, did I? You say this to almost everyone who stand against your passive bullying tactic and disagrees you.

Look at yourself before you raise fingers on others.

It's boring, it's predictive, now please leave me alone, thank you.

[guest29835]

Be a man! Victim playing . Awwww I insulted you and attacked you now, did I? You say this to almost everyone who stand against your passive bullying tactic and disagrees you.

Look at yourself before you raise fingers on others.

It's boring, it's predictive, now please leave me alone, thank you.

You're nutty.

[lookout]

 

[Adam]

The phone off the hook at WHF is Bamber's obvious way of saying 'Nevill called me'.

Suspect he knew a call could not be traced.

Bamber just needed to ring up BT & ask them. A few weeks beforehand.

His proof that Nevill phoned him is - the WHF phone off the hook. Which is as obvious as June's bible.

[Adam]

Payphone is not same as residential line. Completely different ILB.

A simple question to you ILB, if it existed, don't you think the Defence would have digged it out as this case was crucial ?

It would have been all over the internet over the last 20 years.

[Munksa]

It takes one to know one.

Better be nutty and fruity than be a *****y and run to the admin 😁

True story

[Adam]

Bamber had two options -

Don't ring his AM. He correctly knew he didn't need to. Take the WHF phone off the hook as a (rather obvious) stage.

Ring his AM. No need to leave the WHF phone off the hook. That is trying too hard.

----------

Either was no problem for him.

[Adam]

Bamber had two options -

Don't ring his AM. He correctly knew he didn't need to. Take the WHF phone off the hook as a (rather obvious) stage.

Ring his AM. No need to leave the WHF phone off the hook. That is trying too hard.

----------

Either was no problem for him.

He may have still done that if unsure.

[ILB]

Payphone is not same as residential line. Completely different ILB.

A simple question to you ILB, if it existed, don't you think the Defence would have digged it out as this call was crucial ?

payphone you would think would be harder to trace than resedential landline to landline

[Rob_]

Fair enough.

I can do no more than create a straight forward scenario which matches the crime scene evidence.

The very thing that a lot of guilters say incriminates JB to me suggests innocence, I know you think I am a crank but there you go. If you can elaborate from the moment JB has just shot Sheila that will do.