Author Topic: Telecoms in 1985  (Read 15594 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13249
Re: Telecoms in 1985
« Reply #255 on: January 13, 2022, 08:15:PM »
I hasten to add. I have always remained neutral on Bambers innocence or gulit. But what he claims is not absurd. His stance he has stated from 1985 is not absurd or unbelievable.
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44575
Re: Telecoms in 1985
« Reply #256 on: January 13, 2022, 08:16:PM »
Nevill and Jeremy despite their differences were still close. He had adopted him from three months of age. They worked together. They played practical jokes together. They saw each other on a daily basis day in day out. It's not uncommon that Nevill would not phone his son Jeremy. This is 1985. And Nevill was old school and a magistrate and pillar of the community.

Nevill leaving a message on Bamber's AM is not benefitting him against Sheila.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline ILB

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13249
Re: Telecoms in 1985
« Reply #257 on: January 13, 2022, 08:21:PM »
Nevill leaving a message on Bamber's AM is not benefitting him against Sheila.
you must appreciate I never claimed this happened. I think you have the intelligence to decipher the point I'm making
« Last Edit: January 13, 2022, 08:25:PM by ilovebooze »
If yesterday you hated me. Then today you can not stop the love that binds from me to you. And you to me