Sequence of events surrounding the silencer.

[lookout]

'Hi Lookout' the documentation currently in my possession concerning how many times 'DS Jones' saw and spoke to 'Julie Mugford' before the commencement of 'Jeremys' trial amounted to '32 separate occasions'. However, when 'DS Jones' went on annual leave, 'DC Barlow' took up the mantle practiced by him...

So it doesn't sound as though either officers had a witness with them when questioning JM. It figures !

[Roch]

Roch, perhaps you could outline for me, exactly what it is about, what I imagine to be, his question(s) to me, that you regard as being 'fair'.

I will do Jane but not tonight. I don't support you being repeatedly questioned.. just now and again.. 

[JackieD]

What on earth makes you think you might be the only one who does, and others don't?

You haven’t got a clue have you

Ask Roch, David, Rob and Lookout what they think about QC

[Jane]

You haven’t got a clue have you

Ask Roch, David, Rob and Lookout what they think about QC

If you say so, and you choose to believe it, but I wonder why you'd say that? What has what anyone else thinks about him have to do with WHO he is?

[lookout]

It's rare that I welcome anyone onto the forum because I don't like being taken for a ride. QC was no exception when he joined because I totally ignored him, in fact we had a spat. However, as time went on and I realised that he had a sense of humour ( always wins for me as I think of Campion in that respect ) and although the subject of the debate is by no means humerous QC manages to bring out some quaint phrases that take the edge off the seriousness of it all.   

[Jane]

It's rare that I welcome anyone onto the forum because I don't like being taken for a ride. QC was no exception when he joined because I totally ignored him, in fact we had a spat. However, as time went on and I realised that he had a sense of humour ( always wins for me as I think of Campion in that respect ) and although the subject of the debate is by no means humerous QC manages to bring out some quaint phrases that take the edge off the seriousness of it all.   

Aww! That's a really lovely post, Lookout, and it's strange you mention Campion as I knew him very well. We'd talk about all sorts, and he frequently mentioned his son.

[lookout]

Aww! That's a really lovely post, Lookout, and it's strange you mention Campion as I knew him very well. We'd talk about all sorts, and he frequently mentioned his son.

>>>>>>>just been making a cup of tea.

I'd love to have met Campion as he always put me in mind of my old dad with some of his sayings. His son sounded as though he took after him too, a chip off the old block.

[Jane]

>>>>>>>just been making a cup of tea.

I'd love to have met Campion as he always put me in mind of my old dad with some of his sayings. His son sounded as though he took after him too, a chip off the old block.

I'm watching a thing on Pcss Margaret and Tony Snowden. My friend's sis in law is talking about him, She's his biographer and she had to promise not to publish until after his death. She described him as "naughty" by fun and likeable!!
I live very close to where Campion lived. I was lucky to have got to know him as he'd been VERY ill. Some of what he said, I took with a pinch of salt, but he was always amusing.

[killingeve]

Obviously can't help it as it's a well known fact that alcohol addles the brain. It's contagious too !

At least I've got a brain to addle unlike the supporters here and their rubbish posts!

[killingeve]

Alcoholly when are going to stop this trolling campaign?

This is what you resort to when your posts are dissected and rightly rubbished.

[Adam]

This is what you resort to when your posts are dissected and rightly rubbished.

Don't knock David's 'sequence of events'. It only had 37 holes.

[David1819]

This is what you resort to when your posts are dissected and rightly rubbished.

You have achieved nothing of the sort.

[David1819]

At least I've got a brain to addle unlike the supporters here and their rubbish posts!

Rubbish post like you claiming the contact wounds on Nichollas Caffells cheek bone and above his eyebrow, would produce no backspatter because of the hair on his head?

Rubbish posts like you claiming to have refuted a subject "everywhere" when in actual fact you refuted it nowhere?

Rubbish posts like you claiming the case is a "slamdunk" then failing to explain why?

Those kind of rubbish posts? 

[David1819]

Don't knock David's 'sequence of events'. It only had 37 holes.

As expected, you are already ignoring the fact Rob answered them all.

[Adam]

As expected, you are already ignoring the fact Rob answered them all.

That was 22 points.

Rob automatically says AE would not need any information prior to the frame of the century.