Sequence of events surrounding the silencer.

[Adam]

Not relevant, four other victims were shot at very close range.

----------

Important to know each others blood group if framing via Sheila shooting herself.

[David1819]

Holy shit Adam. You have just made 22 sequential posts in under 30 minutes. What a Nutter.

PS: This is also in violation of forum rules 5 and 6.

[Adam]

Holy shit Adam. You have just made 22 sequential posts in under 30 minutes. What a Nutter.

PS: This is also in violation of forum rules 5 and 6.

Do piss off.

You are lucky you are still here after continually breaking moderator instructions & posting personally abusive pictures. 

What happened to Mike's permanant ban of you?

[Rob_]

No need to know this, if Sheila’s blood was in the silencer then it had to be JB who committed the crime.

----------

AE needed to know if Sheila could shoot herself with the silencer attached.

If she could, the frame atrempt fails. 

No if Sheila's blood is in the silencer JB is guilty, assuming the blood is not planted.

[Adam]

No if Sheila's blood is in the silencer JB is guilty, assuming the blood is not planted.

Agree Bamber is guilty. If Sheila could not have shot herself.

[Rob_]

Agree Bamber is guilty. If Sheila could not have shot herself.

It's not proven she could not have shot herself even with the silencer on, there are video's on YouTube suggesting otherwise.

[Adam]

Agree Bamber is guilty. If Sheila could not have shot herself.

Although the evidence shows Sheila did not stand up after  the first shot. So could not have put the silencer away.

AE would need to know this.

[Adam]

AE would have to find out a hell of a lot. Taff certainly wasn't going to tell her anything.

[Rob_]

Although the evidence shows Sheila did not stand up after  the first shot. So could not have put the silencer away.

AE would need to know this.

I agree but there was no silencer to put away as one was never used that night.

[Adam]

I agree but there was no silencer to put away as one was never used that night.

All the COA evidence exonerates Sheila. So only Bamber knows if he used the silencer. Or whether AE committed the frame of the century.

[Rob_]

All the COA evidence exonerates Sheila. So only Bamber knows if he used the silencer. Or whether AE committed the frame of the century.

Page 28 of David Bird's COLP statement is interesting.

[mike tesko]

All the COA evidence exonerates Sheila. So only Bamber knows if he used the silencer. Or whether AE committed the frame of the century.

Your opinion is totally wrong!

`Sheila', was 'still alive when the first 6 man raid team forced entry into the farmhouse. If the' truth be known', 'PS Woodcock' was responsible for inflicting 'the first non-fatal shot' to 'Sheila' when entry was made in relation to the farmhouse, and subsequently, into 'the main kitchen'

[Roch]

Something like 22 replies in succession on this thread Adam. Would it not be better to club some of the answers  together by putting them in a word doc first and then transferring the text in to a post? It's more fiddly for you but it would be better for all concerned.

[Adam]

Something like 22 replies in succession on this thread Adam. Would it not be better to club some of the answers  together by putting them in a word doc first and then transferring the text in to a post? It's more fiddly for you but it would be better for all concerned.

I do usually highlight in bold a section in a post, responding below. As I did with David's thread post at the start of the thread. Other posters do this.

This was after QC made a big fuss over me copying & pasting sections of his posts & replying underneath. 

I couldn't do this with Rob's post as his writing was already in bold.

Rob kindly responded to each of my points. So I had to do the same. 

[Roch]

I do usually highlight in bold a section in a post, responding below. As I did with David's thread post at the start of the thread. Other posters do this.

This was after QC made a big fuss over me copying & pasting sections of his posts & replying underneath. 

I couldn't do this with Rob's post as his writing was already in bold.

Rob kindly responded to each of my points. So I had to do the same.

Ok thanks for the explanation.