Sequence of events surrounding the silencer.

[Roch]

I'd like to see how and where those 3 adults first died because I don't believe that they'd been found in the positions that we're led to believe.

Tatchell has claimed that there is photographic evidence that all bodies were moved.  His lack of detail makes the claim ambiguous and open to interpretation. It is therefore not possible to know whether he is referring to something very dodgy or something more benign that happened during photography. Given the CT now claim that Sheila's first shot was her fatal shot and that 30 shots were fired that night, it would appear that previous sketches of how the incident panned out are obsolete.

[Rob_]

Give it about week and Adam will paste the same questions saying nobody has yet answered them.

Yes I know David Adam likes winding people up 

[Rob_]

I'd like to see how and where those 3 adults first died because I don't believe that they'd been found in the positions that we're led to believe.

I agree Lookout, I think you posted a photograph of June a while back that looks very strange?

[David1819]

Tatchell has claimed that there is photographic evidence that all bodies were moved.  His lack of detail makes the claim ambiguous and open to interpretation. It is therefore not possible to know whether he is referring to something very dodgy or something more benign that happened during photography. Given the CT now claim that Sheila's first shot was her fatal shot and that 30 shots were fired that night, it would appear that previous sketches of how the incident panned out are obsolete.

Tatchell is primarily being fed the CT narrative that I have already explained is incorrect and easily dismantled.

I suspect Tatchell is of the view that Jeremy's bisexuality and Robert Boutflour's homophobia played a role in Robert Bouflours efforts to get a conviction. And that is a valid view to hold, it may well be true.

I also suspect Tatchell is primarily focused on raising awareness rather that studying case material, hence I an not going to consider him an authority on the Bamber case.

[Roch]

Tatchell is primarily being fed the CT narrative that I have already explained is incorrect and easily dismantled.

I suspect Tatchell is of the view that Jeremy's bisexuality and Robert Boutflour's homophobia played a role in Robert Bouflours efforts to get a conviction. And that is a valid view to hold, it may well be true.

I also suspect Tatchell is primarily focused on raising awareness rather that studying case material, hence I an not going to consider him an authority on the Bamber case.

Tatchell's podcast is worth a listen. He describes the non-disclosure issues eloquently. There is something of 'Robert Powell' about him.

[lookout]

Tatchell has claimed that there is photographic evidence that all bodies were moved.  His lack of detail makes the claim ambiguous and open to interpretation. It is therefore not possible to know whether he is referring to something very dodgy or something more benign that happened during photography. Given the CT now claim that Sheila's first shot was her fatal shot and that 30 shots were fired that night, it would appear that previous sketches of how the incident panned out are obsolete.

Because nobody not even the police were present when this tragedy happened it does leave the case wide open to misinterpretations. For instance Sheila could have been standing when she shot herself, sad as it sounds it's a simpler method than lying down as she was tall and would have had no trouble holding the rifle up to her neck.

[lookout]

Because nobody not even the police were present when this tragedy happened it does leave the case wide open to misinterpretations. For instance Sheila could have been standing when she shot herself, sad as it sounds it's a simpler method than lying down as she was tall and would have had no trouble holding the rifle up to her neck.

With her being upright, it would account for the blood drops ( downwards ) on her arm which couldn't have got there if she'd been lying down.

[Roch]

With her being upright, it would account for the blood drops ( downwards ) on her arm which couldn't have got there if she'd been lying down.

According to David and Peter Vanezis, those marks on her wrist are where the blood stops. Therefore they can't have been dripped on to her arm.

[lookout]

According to David and Peter Vanezis, those marks on her wrist are where the blood stops. Therefore they can't have been dripped on to her arm.

Liquid doesn't stop running whether you're dead or alive and that includes blood.

[Adam]

Give it about week and Adam will paste the same questions saying nobody has yet answered them.

You certainly have never answered. Unlike Rob.

Rob is very naive & thinks AE wpuld need no information prior to succeeding in the frame of the century. I'll dismiss each of his responses now.

[Adam]

She just had to believe Sheila could not commit the crime so it had to be JB, she thought she was helping justice prevail.

---------

If there was evidence Bamber was innocent, AE would be prosecuted for an attempted (and failed) frame

[Adam]

No need to know this, if Sheila’s blood was in the silencer then it had to be JB who committed the crime.

----------

AE needed to know if Sheila could shoot herself with the silencer attached.

If she could, the frame atrempt fails. 

[Adam]

This is immaterial, as said above if Sheila’s blood is in the silencer this is enough to convict JB.

----------

Ditto previous post.

[Adam]

Yes several ways, even if her arms were not long enough though this is not proven I believe? I have seen video's of a girl the same height as Sheila able to reach the trigger with the silencer on.

----------

Videos 20 years later would not help AE.

[Adam]

No need to know  anything about back spatter, a layman in the street would assume that a very close range / contact shot is highly lightly to result in traces of blood etc. getting into the barrel.

-------,,Disagree. AE would also need to know if the rifle Bamber used was powerful enough to produce back spatter.