Author Topic: My Challenge To The Supporters  (Read 35845 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #525 on: November 26, 2021, 04:24:PM »

Frankly, I don't believe you give a toss, Jackie. All this supposed compassion for poor Sheila is little more than a ruse to heap blame on her and to get JB out.

Your favourite phrase 'I dont believe' The fact is you know nothing you are are just a village gossip with nothing better to do with your sad life.

Dont tell me I have no compassion for Sheila, you vile human being.  if you have nothing useful of truthful to say do one
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #526 on: November 26, 2021, 04:25:PM »
The report is by Roland Topping, person unknown 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I haven't opened any links RJ, so tbh, I am only guessing that you and David are discussing two versions of the same statement. If I am wrong then I apologize 😂

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #527 on: November 26, 2021, 04:26:PM »
If my suggested explanation is correct (bearing in mind I haven't even read what you and David are referring to, as I haven't got time), then the statement not used may have later come to light.
Sorry Roch, I smell a Roland Rat, (excuse the pun)

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #528 on: November 26, 2021, 04:33:PM »
The report is by Roland Topping, person unknown 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂





That's a Nom-de-Plume I would say.

guest7363

  • Guest
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #529 on: November 26, 2021, 04:52:PM »
I haven't opened any links RJ, so tbh, I am only guessing that you and David are discussing two versions of the same statement. If I am wrong then I apologize 😂
No, if you open it up Roch it gives a better explanation, this Roland Rat guy says it was brought up in Court and he gives it as Bews had said about the movement in his statement, but if you check Bews Statement he never mentions it. 

Offline Jane

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 33776
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #530 on: November 26, 2021, 04:57:PM »
Your favourite phrase 'I dont believe' The fact is you know nothing you are are just a village gossip with nothing better to do with your sad life.

Dont tell me I have no compassion for Sheila, you vile human being.  if you have nothing useful of truthful to say do one


Well, now, Jackie dear, I wonder what that makes you, eh? For starters, a poisonous witch, who's probably been thrown off more forums, for causing trouble, than the rest of us, here, have had hot dinners. You may be certain that when I say "I don't believe.........." it's way more honest than your claims, and if it's my favourite phrase, yours is claiming to know about others' lives. Seems everyone but you, according to you, that is, has a sad one.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13781
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #531 on: November 26, 2021, 05:05:PM »
If its a slamdunk, go ahead and make your case for why JB is guilty.

I'm waiting.

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #532 on: November 26, 2021, 05:09:PM »
I'm waiting.

As Adam said

That is what he/she has been doing since joining.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13781
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #533 on: November 26, 2021, 05:50:PM »
As Adam said

That is what he/she has been doing since joining.

Put forward your case for why you believe Jeremy is guilty.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #534 on: November 26, 2021, 05:53:PM »
Put forward your case for why you believe Jeremy is guilty.

Be interesting to see if it deviates from a prosecution / CAL type scenario.

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #535 on: November 26, 2021, 08:21:PM »
Put forward your case for why you believe Jeremy is guilty.
He's guilty because he felt trapped in the farming industry by the terms of his father's will, and to escape from his prison he had to kill the prison guards. He blamed his mentally-ill sister, knowing full well it could never be proved whether she pulled the trigger alone or his hand guided the rifle.

The icing on the cake was to buy a £38,000 Porsche to attract women, a present he could only bestow on himself by killing his twin nephews in the slaughter, leaving their brains splattered on the bedhead behind.
« Last Edit: November 26, 2021, 08:24:PM by Steve_uk »

Online ngb1066

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6671
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #536 on: November 26, 2021, 09:20:PM »

The icing on the cake was to buy a £38,000 Porsche to attract women, a present he could only bestow on himself by killing his twin nephews in the slaughter, leaving their brains splattered on the bedhead behind.

I have objected to this before.  The murder of two little boys in their sleep is terrible enough, but it is not helpful to fabricate details as you have done in the words highlighted in bold above.  There is no evidence for it, it is not helpful and in my view it is distasteful and inflammatory.

Offline JackieD

  • Veteran Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3879
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #537 on: November 26, 2021, 09:50:PM »
I have objected to this before.  The murder of two little boys in their sleep is terrible enough, but it is not helpful to fabricate details as you have done in the words highlighted in bold above.  There is no evidence for it, it is not helpful and in my view it is distasteful and inflammatory.

He is a very sick individual and it’s all the more galling because his idol volunteered to view the children bodies
Julie Mugford the main prosecution witness was guilty of numerous crimes, 13 separate cheque frauds, robbery, and drug dealing and also making a deal with a national newspaper before trial that if she could convince a jury her ex boyfriend was guilty of five murders she would receive £25,000

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13781
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #538 on: November 27, 2021, 10:56:AM »
Be interesting to see if it deviates from a prosecution / CAL type scenario.

So much for a "slamdunk". Just the sound of crickets so far. 

Offline killingeve

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 299
Re: My Challenge To The Supporters
« Reply #539 on: November 27, 2021, 11:20:AM »
Be interesting to see if it deviates from a prosecution / CAL type scenario.

Why would it?