A great post from the facebook group.

[lookout]

That's a bit like dyed black hair making him guilty, Steve.

[Rob_]

36.

A lot of blood on Nevill's side of the bed - Not disputed - COA.


74:

No gun shot residue on Sheila's hands. COA. Not disputed.

Adam why do you keep saying not disputed? Can you instead say members can't be bothered to correct you?

For example:

Nevil's side of the bed had no blood on it, it was June's side that had the blood on.

As for gun shot residue, with a rifle the shooter won't get much GSR on their hands anyway. But as she had none on her, this is proof she must have washed as everyone would have GSR on them with 25 shots being fired.

[Rob_]

That's a bit like dyed black hair making him guilty, Steve.

Oh Lookout  now Adam has got 75 pieces of damming evidence!

[Steve_uk]

Adam why do you keep saying not disputed? Can you instead say members can't be bothered to correct you?

For example:

Nevil's side of the bed had no blood on it, it was June's side that had the blood on.

As for gun shot residue, with a rifle the shooter won't get much GSR on their hands anyway. But as she had none on her, this is proof she must have washed as everyone would have GSR on them with 25 shots being fired.

Yes and she did the hokey cokey as well.

[David1819]

"The Gish Gallop is the fallacious debate tactic of drowning your opponent in a flood of individually-weak arguments in order to prevent rebuttal of the whole argument collection without great effort. The Gish Gallop is a conveyor belt-fed version of the on the spot fallacy, as it's unreasonable for anyone to have a well-composed answer immediately available to every argument present in the Gallop"

"Gish Gallops are almost always performed with numerous other logical fallacies baked in. The myriad component arguments constituting the Gallop may typically intersperse a few perfectly uncontroversial claims — the basic validity of which are intended to lend undue credence to the Gallop at large — with a devious hodgepodge of half-truths, outright lies, red herrings and straw men — which, if not rebutted as the fallacies they are, pile up into egregious problems for the refuter."

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Gish_Gallop

[David1819]

Adam why do you keep saying not disputed? Can you instead say members can't be bothered to correct you?

For example:

Nevil's side of the bed had no blood on it, it was June's side that had the blood on.

As for gun shot residue, with a rifle the shooter won't get much GSR on their hands anyway. But as she had none on her, this is proof she must have washed as everyone would have GSR on them with 25 shots being fired.

He has been corrected enough times. He just keeps pasting the same list of crap over and over again.

[Adam]

Adam why do you keep saying not disputed? Can you instead say members can't be bothered to correct you?

For example:

Nevil's side of the bed had no blood on it, it was June's side that had the blood on.

As for gun shot residue, with a rifle the shooter won't get much GSR on their hands anyway. But as she had none on her, this is proof she must have washed as everyone would have GSR on them with 25 shots being fired.

Not disputed means by Bamber or the CT.

Washing would not remove GSR.

There was blood all over the floor on Nevill's side of the bed. Probably a combination of Sheila & June. A slim chance mouth blood dripped from Nevill.

Anyway. Now you know there are 74 pieces of 'sourced' evidence.

[lookout]

Oh Lookout  now Adam has got 75 pieces of damming evidence!

It keeps going up 

[Adam]

It keeps going up 

I keep agreeing with you today.

[lookout]

I keep agreeing with you today.

Probably done to keep me sweet,eh ?

[Rob_]

Yes and she did the hokey cokey as well.

Well Sheila is in a room in which 12 shots have been fired and Adam is saying no GSR on her?

How do you explain this? it's a genuine question.

[Rob_]

He has been corrected enough times. He just keeps pasting the same list of crap over and over again.

He makes it hard for people like me trying to learn more about the case now he is going on about flippers 

[lookout]

He makes it hard for people like me trying to learn more about the case now he is going on about flippers 

They matched the wet suit that he pedalled home in. The snorkel was in the basket in front of the bike.

[Adam]

He makes it hard for people like me trying to learn more about the case now he is going on about flippers 

Lookout brought up flippers.

Keep up.

[Adam]

Well Sheila is in a room in which 12 shots have been fired and Adam is saying no GSR on her?

How do you explain this? it's a genuine question.

Washing would not remove GSR.