Podcast by Bamber's support group containing information about 03/21 submission

[lookout]

The evidence that AE wrote in her notebook a day after the funeral ? Yes, she couldn't even wait to hear any details from EP on how many bullets were fired, where they'd died, nothing whatsoever about the investigation, nor the fact that it was they, the relatives who took Nevill's wallet making it look as though JB had taken it. Sad and in mourning ? I don't think so as there was little love lost it would have seemed.

[killingeve]

Can you point me to this evidence because I don't see any! You keep asking forum members to give you information, where is the evidence that satisfy's you JB is guilty?

The crime to me was committed by someone totally off their head it was a act of total rage.

Your premise seems to be SC can't have done it so it must be JB? That's the only argument you have? So please list the keys bits of evidence that convinces you of guilt and I don't mean Adam's 74 items of total crap.

There's a clear distinction between evidence and information.  No one is disputing Bamber has a 100 page doc in his possession detailing why the  2010/11/12 submission failed.

A bit silly to say there's no evidence when Bamber is serving a whole tariff and has been behind bars for 36 years. 

[killingeve]

The evidence that AE wrote in her notebook a day after the funeral ? Yes, she couldn't even wait to hear any details from EP on how many bullets were fired, where they'd died, nothing whatsoever about the investigation, nor the fact that it was they, the relatives who took Nevill's wallet making it look as though JB had taken it. Sad and in mourning ? I don't think so as there was little love lost it would have seemed.

What has this got to do with the thread?

You sound like you are emotionally involved with Bamber.  In your eyes he can do no wrong. 

[lookout]

What has this got to do with the thread?

You sound like you are emotionally involved with Bamber.  In your eyes he can do no wrong.

Emotionally involved ? I'm 81 for God's sake so have lived long enough to see that lots of things in life just don't add up. Our justice system for instance. With all the technology we now have, the law still gets it wrong ! If anyone was acting suspiciously it was the family/ relatives, not Jeremy as he hadn't got a clue what was about to transpire simply because he wasn't guilty of anything except telling the truth !

[killingeve]

Emotionally involved ? I'm 81 for God's sake so have lived long enough to see that lots of things in life just don't add up. Our justice system for instance. With all the technology we now have, the law still gets it wrong ! If anyone was acting suspiciously it was the family/ relatives, not Jeremy as he hadn't got a clue what was about to transpire simply because he wasn't guilty of anything except telling the truth !

What's age got to do with anything?  18 or 81 you might have devloped romantic/intimate thoughts about Bamber.  Age is no barrier!

I am not really understanding why you are so convinced Bamber is innocent?  This is the reason I suggest you might have become emotionally involved. 

[lookout]

What's age got to do with anything?  18 or 81 you might have devloped romantic/intimate thoughts about Bamber.  Age is no barrier!

I am not really understanding why you are so convinced Bamber is innocent?  This is the reason I suggest you might have become emotionally involved.

Now I know you're not the full shilling !! " Age is no barrier " I've heard everything now.

According to you I'm not even allowed to have my own view without there having to be an ulterior motive. I happen to believe strongly that the man is innocent. 

No way am I emotionally involved. Let's just say I've experienced life and you haven't, up there in your ivory tower on that pedestal of yours. How I long for people like you to come tumbling down to earth----preferably with a bump !

[killingeve]

Now I know you're not the full shilling !! " Age is no barrier " I've heard everything now.

According to you I'm not even allowed to have my own view without there having to be an ulterior motive. I happen to believe strongly that the man is innocent. 

No way am I emotionally involved. Let's just say I've experienced life and you haven't, up there in your ivory tower on that pedestal of yours. How I long for people like you to come tumbling down to earth----preferably with a bump !

You do realise there are laws against ageism. 

[lookout]

You do realise there are laws against ageism. 

What's that got to do with anything ?

[Rob_]

There's a clear distinction between evidence and information.  No one is disputing Bamber has a 100 page doc in his possession detailing why the  2010/11/12 submission failed.

A bit silly to say there's no evidence when Bamber is serving a whole tariff and has been behind bars for 36 years.

Well what evidence convinces you JB is guilty? I have looked hard and am struggling, there is serious doubt at everything I look at?

Bullet points will do, lets see what you can come up with you seem very sure the conviction is safe.

[JackieD]

Now I know you're not the full shilling !! " Age is no barrier " I've heard everything now.

According to you I'm not even allowed to have my own view without there having to be an ulterior motive. I happen to believe strongly that the man is innocent. 

No way am I emotionally involved. Let's just say I've experienced life and you haven't, up there in your ivory tower on that pedestal of yours. How I long for people like you to come tumbling down to earth----preferably with a bump !

Lookout I think it’s time the thing is banned. You are absolutely right

QC has left and we have the thing instead.
I miss having someone who thinks Jeremy is guilty that you can actually debate with

[Rob_]

No doubt Rivlin picked up on this from Bewes/Myall notebooks/statements and at the time it happened Bamber agreed it was a 'trick of the light'.   But the point is Bamber had ample opportunity to present his alibi to DCI Jones/DS Jones during his interviews and at trial when Anthony Arlidge put it to him he murdered his family but he failed to do so because he knew it was a 'trick of the light' having seen it himself. 

Decades later he wants to use this as his alibi because he's scraping the barrel!

If you took the trouble to read Bews and Myall's statements you would know there is no mention of the trick of the light in them. I keep asking you if they were satisfied it was a reflection why did they run?

[killingeve]

Well what evidence convinces you JB is guilty? I have looked hard and am struggling, there is serious doubt at everything I look at?

Bullet points will do, lets see what you can come up with you seem very sure the conviction is safe.

Its the totality of the evidence. 

[killingeve]

If you took the trouble to read Bews and Myall's statements you would know there is no mention of the trick of the light in them. I keep asking you if they were satisfied it was a reflection why did they run?

And if you took the trouble to read PS Bews and PC Myall's statement you would know there is not mention of running!

[Rob_]

Its the totality of the evidence.

Umm ok well if you think that is strong enough for someone to spend maybe 60 years in jail who am I to argue.

[Rob_]

And if you took the trouble to read PS Bews and PC Myall's statement you would know there is not mention of running!

You have not studied the case have you, please read Saxby's statement who stayed with the car when Bews, Myall and JB went to the farmhouse.