Author Topic: Louis Theroux  (Read 40171 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #195 on: October 02, 2021, 10:45:AM »
I liked your summing up QC, Ann Eaton does not appear I thought she would have?

Looking at her first statement about half of it is referring to Sheila's mental state she did not appear to suspect JB at this time?

But what I find astounding is no mention on the silencer?

She had already contacted the police about the silencer and shown them the scratch marks under the mantle shelf before that statement was made.

Offline Roch

  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 17586
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #196 on: October 02, 2021, 10:47:AM »
I liked your summing up QC, Ann Eaton does not appear I thought she would have?

Looking at her first statement about half of it is referring to Sheila's mental state she did not appear to suspect JB at this time?

But what I find astounding is no mention on the silencer?

During the last decade at the very least DB seems to have fronted for the relatives. That could be for any number of reasons. David is a natural in front of camera. He also featured in the Sunday Times article and is famed for his reaction to a suggested silencer conspiracy.. describing it as 'absolute piffle'. 

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #197 on: October 02, 2021, 10:53:AM »
So I've noticed Roch. Many would have been and are taken in, but I never have been about any of them !
I have a picture in my mind of his smugness after the funerals-----" there are no winners,etc " Oh yes there were !!

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #198 on: October 02, 2021, 10:53:AM »
I have corrected you several times in relation to the NOW deal.  The agreement was in writing.

The "trick of the light" was mentioned at trial.

You need to provide documents to the CT. They have been searching for 36 years 

Who testified about the 'trick of a light'? Have you got sources please? Either way, the jury were not impressed.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #199 on: October 02, 2021, 10:55:AM »
So I've noticed Roch. Many would have been and are taken in, but I never have been about any of them !
I have a picture in my mind of his smugness after the funerals-----" there are no winners,etc " Oh yes there were !!

'There are no winners' was after the trial.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #200 on: October 02, 2021, 10:58:AM »
I liked your summing up QC, Ann Eaton does not appear I thought she would have?

Looking at her first statement about half of it is referring to Sheila's mental state she did not appear to suspect JB at this time?

But what I find astounding is no mention on the silencer?

AE has only appeared in one documentary. Where she spoke about Sheila not being able to overpower Nevill. Sadly not on Youtube.

You only responded to 4 of my 34 flaws in your Sheila scenario. Is not having a Sheila scenario not important?
« Last Edit: October 02, 2021, 10:59:AM by Adam »
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #201 on: October 02, 2021, 10:59:AM »
'There are no winners' was after the trial.




Whenever it was, it was said with a supercilious attitude----all the way to the bank.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #202 on: October 02, 2021, 11:00:AM »



Whenever it was, it was said with a supercilious attitude----all the way to the bank.

Do you believe the relatives framed Bamber with the silencer?
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #203 on: October 02, 2021, 11:01:AM »
You need to provide documents to the CT. They have been searching for 36 years 

Who testified about the 'trick of a light'? Have you got sources please? Either way, the jury were not impressed.




Wasn't it Rivlin who'd suggested that it was " a trick of the light ", and Bews duly agreed ?

Offline David1819

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 13785
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #204 on: October 02, 2021, 11:06:AM »
'There are no winners' was after the trial.

That comment by him is comical.

Julie got £25,000 and her fraud charges dropped.
Ann got control of the caravan park and her debts to JB eliminated.
DB and RWB got all the rest of the £500,000 worth of assets.




Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #205 on: October 02, 2021, 11:07:AM »
Adam, not once throughout all your posts and amid evidence which has come to light, have you mentioned that the conviction seems or could be unsafe. Where's your intelligence ? Even many of those who believe JB to be guilty are saying this since drama's/ docu's have been shown.

Offline Adam

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 44410
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #206 on: October 02, 2021, 11:15:AM »
Adam, not once throughout all your posts and amid evidence which has come to light, have you mentioned that the conviction seems or could be unsafe. Where's your intelligence ? Even many of those who believe JB to be guilty are saying this since drama's/ docu's have been shown.

It was a straight forward conviction. The police suspecting Bamber a few days after the massacre.

Throughout the 90's & early noughties, Mike was Bamber's only supporter.

The internet has resulted in minor things being magnified. Together with the old chestnut of withheld documents. Even QC has been duped.
'Only I know what really happened that night'.

Offline lookout

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 48676
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #207 on: October 02, 2021, 11:19:AM »
It was a straight forward conviction. The police suspecting Bamber a few days after the massacre.

Throughout the 90's & early noughties, Mike was Bamber's only supporter.

The internet has resulted in minor things being magnified. Together with the old chestnut of withheld documents. Even QC has been duped.




If, as you say it was a " straightforward conviction " then why, after 36 years is it still rumbling on, or rather why are you still rumbling on ?

Offline Rob_

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4829
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #208 on: October 02, 2021, 11:32:AM »
You need to provide documents to the CT. They have been searching for 36 years 

Who testified about the 'trick of a light'? Have you got sources please? Either way, the jury were not impressed.

It's not so much the trick of the light I find interesting Adam, but why they ducked down and ran back to the car?

Why no mention in Bews and Myall's statements??

Offline Steve_uk

  • Hero Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 21102
Re: Louis Theroux
« Reply #209 on: October 02, 2021, 11:35:AM »
That comment by him is comical.

Julie got £25,000 and her fraud charges dropped.
Ann got control of the caravan park and her debts to JB eliminated.
DB and RWB got all the rest of the £500,000 worth of assets.




Nobody would have known about the cheque book frauds but for Julie coming clean. She arranged a deal to get the marauding Press pack off her back. Ann Eaton would have inherited Osea Road in time along with half her parents' estate, which would have included monies from Mabel Speakman. RWB inherited nothing directly from Bamber's conviction.

I do have a question about the 1989 Lord Lane appeal. There doesn't seem to be much material online about it, though Mr. QC Chevalier did speculate in a prior thread, which I quite enjoyed. Could anyone elaborate further in this area?