US / UK foreign policy - yet another embarrassment

[David1819]

Who commissioned it? It was cut to the detriment of any dissenting voices, in an attempt to discredit them. Some contributers were advised not to cooperate (for this very reason) but chose to ignore advice, and later regretted it. I believe it was shown on the BBC. As well as producing sometimes brilliant wild life and drama shows, the BBC doubles up as a propaganda outlet for the UK state and its apparatus, notably UK security services. The clue is in the name David: BRITISH Broadcasting Corporation.

You are actually insulting the families of the victims, many of who simply do not accept the official version of events and have campaigned for an independent enquiry (something that doesn't meaningfully exist in the UK).

By repeatedly using the term conspiritard, you are simply plummeting your own standing. It's no better a strategy for posting than is 'gish gash gollup' or whatever it's called.

How do you know Aliens didn't carry out the attacks?

[David1819]

How do you know Aliens didn't carry out the attacks?

Since the Aliens used a quote from a film poster for supple dramatization on one side of the bus. What was their reasoning for using a coca cola advert on the other side? The coke bottle even has some kind of imagery resembling an explosion behind it! Coincidence I think not!.

How comes one end was obliterated leaving the coke advert undamaged? The Alien conspirators must have connections to Coca Cola!. The investigation continues -

[guest29835]

Who commissioned it? It was cut to the detriment of any dissenting voices, in an attempt to discredit them. Some contributers were advised not to cooperate (for this very reason) but chose to ignore advice, and later regretted it. I believe it was shown on the BBC. As well as producing sometimes brilliant wild life and drama shows, the BBC doubles up as a propaganda outlet for the UK state and its apparatus, notably UK security services. The clue is in the name David: BRITISH Broadcasting Corporation.

You are actually insulting the families of the victims, many of who simply do not accept the official version of events and have campaigned for an independent enquiry (something that doesn't meaningfully exist in the UK).

By repeatedly using the term conspiritard, you are simply plummeting your own standing. It's no better a strategy for posting than is 'gish gash gollup' or whatever it's called.

I agree on the use of 'conspiritard', etc., which I think is out-of-line.

I regard the gish gallop complaint as fair enough.

[Roch]

How do you know Aliens didn't carry out the attacks?

I'm not sure why you keep referring to aliens, in your responses to me. I do not believe I have ever stated that aliens were to blame for any incidents discussed on here. The terror message is effectively a calling card, to those in the intelligence community.

[Roch]

I agree on the use of 'conspiritard', etc., which I think is out-of-line.

I regard the gish gallop complaint as fair enough.

Thank you.

My point was that David repeatedly points out Gish gash gollup as being a bad posting strategy / trollism, but then keeps posting 'conspiritard' and 'aliens' at every turn.

[David1819]

I'm not sure why you keep referring to aliens, in your responses to me. I do not believe I have ever stated that aliens were to blame for any incidents discussed on here. The terror message is effectively a calling card, to those in the intelligence community.

If you can just make up wild theories with no evidence, then why not Aliens? 

[Roch]

If you can just make up wild theories with no evidence, then why not Aliens? 

The official version of events is not supported by numerous victims' family members. It also happens to be a conspiracy theory. The victims' family members do not support any alternative conspiracy theories, because they feel that such theories draw attention away from the errors, anomalies and holes in the official conspiracy theory.

[David1819]

The official version of events is not supported by numerous victims' family members. It also happens to be a conspiracy theory. The victims' family members do not support any alternative conspiracy theories, because they feel that such theories draw attention away from the errors, anomalies and holes in the official conspiracy theory.

Do not be fooled. Any of the victims family members who doubt the official version, are all state actors and shills. Ensuring that the real conspiracy that involves Aliens is never brought up!

You see It's all a facade to make sure the real questions are not asked. I suspect the Aliens also commissioned Nick Kollerstrom to write that book! Its all to divert us sceptics down the wrong path!

[Roch]

Do not be fooled. Any of the victims family members who doubt the official version, are all state actors and shills. Ensuring that the real conspiracy that involves Aliens is never brought up!

You see It's all a facade to make sure the real questions are not asked. I suspect the Aliens also commissioned Nick Kollerstrom to write that book! Its all to divert us sceptics down the wrong path!

Your lack of understanding is very telling.

[guest29835]

Do not be fooled. Any of the victims family members who doubt the official version, are all state actors and shills. Ensuring that the real conspiracy that involves Aliens is never brought up!

You see It's all a facade to make sure the real questions are not asked. I suspect the Aliens also commissioned Nick Kollerstrom to write that book! Its all to divert us sceptics down the wrong path!

On a serious note, I do think a lot of this material is a deliberate diversion.  It serves the aim of diverting sceptical people down blind alleys and also discrediting them by associating scepticism about various issues with eccentric or 'loony' positions.

[Roch]

On a serious note, I do think a lot of this material is a deliberate diversion.  It serves the aim of diverting sceptical people down blind alleys and also discrediting them by associating scepticism about various issues with eccentric or 'loony' positions.

On the day of the bombings, at the same time and in the same stations, a drill was being carried out, for a terror attack scenario. The man who revealed this, did so on television.  The official version of events, isn't interested whatsoever in this curious coincidence.  In other words, no attempt has been made by the authorities to link the accused bombers with the drill, in any way or form.  I'm not even sure whether the drill is mentioned.

There was also an incident at Canary Wharf, where there were shootings.  Two to three people were supposed to have been shot.  This has also been airbrushed out of the official version.  An academic has since carried out a study in to the CW incident.  After the alleged shootings at CW, the news reports changed from reporting incidents on the tube, to reporting terror attacks on the tube.

[David1819]

On the day of the bombings, at the same time and in the same stations, a drill was being carried out, for a terror attack scenario. The man who revealed this, did so on television.  The official version of events, isn't interested whatsoever in this curious coincidence.  In other words, no attempt has been made by the authorities to link the accused bombers with the drill, in any way or form.  I'm not even sure whether the drill is mentioned.

Why would they need to link the bombers to a training drill?

https://powerbase.info/index.php/Peter_Power

[Roch]

Why would they need to link the bombers to a training drill?

https://powerbase.info/index.php/Peter_Power

Are you for real? And you're using wiki as a source?

[David1819]

Are you for real? And you're using wiki as a source?

Beats taking the word of a guy who claims Aliens go around abducting sheep.

The issue has been addressed in the conspiratards road trip

https://youtu.be/_oMMatsr7QI?t=1809

[Roch]

I can see why Caroline and Jayne tired of you. You are extremely childish at times.  The terror drill he was simulating for a client he still refuses to name, was based upon bombs going off in "precisely" the same stations where the bombs actually went off, on the day they went off, at the time they went off.