I agree with much of what the commenter says, but not all.
For instance, I disagree with the assertion that the evidence shows with certainty that Sheila could not be the killer.
Unfortunately, this case falls into the 'black box' category, and there is reasonable doubt. I don't like it as it means that a probable mass murderer - a double child killer to boot - can continue pleading innocence, but I don't get to say what the evidence is.
It is what it is. I'm just being honest and objective about it. I would have to vote Not Guilty, if I were on a trial jury hearing this. Sorry.
But in all your posts you cannot come up anything that could prove he was the killer?

Are you shocked that there are still many statements from Julie still withheld
The key to proving the truth will be those documents